• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
1CHAPTER X
The Economic System of Islam
 From Chapter 10, “
 Introduction to Islam
” by Dr. Muhammad Hamidullah
I
slam provides guidance to its adherents in all phasesand activities of life, in matters material as well asspiritual. Its basic teaching with regard to economicsis mentioned in several passages of the Qur'an. Far fromdespising material well-being, it recognizes (4 : 5) that,". . .
 your goods which God has made as the verymeans of your subsistence
. . . ."; and it orders, "
and neglect not thy portion of this world 
" (28 : 77). It laysemphasis , however, on the dual composition of man, byreminding him thus: ". . .
but of mankind is he who saith, ‘Our Lord! give unto us in this world; and hehath no portion in the Hereafter. And of them is alsohe who saith,
Our Lord! give unto us what is good inthis world and what is good in the Hereafter, and  guard us from the doom of Fire. For these there is in store a goodly portion out of that which they haveearned: God is swift at reckoning 
." (2 : 200-2). In otherverses we find it stated plainly and definitely that, all thatis found on the earth, in the seas and the heavens hasbeen created by God for the benefit of man; or that allthat is on the earth, in the heavens, the ocean, the starsand others have been made subservient to man by God. Itmeans for man to know and to profit by the creation of God, and profit in a rational way, paying due regard tothe future.338. The economic policy of Islam has also beenexplained in the Qur'an in the most unequivocal terms: "
.. . so that this (wealth) may not circulate solely among the rich from among you.
. . ." (Q. 59 : 7) Equality of allmen in wealth and comfort – even if it is ideal – doesnot promise to be of unmixed good to humanity. Firstbecause natural talents are not equal among differentmen, so much so that even if one were to start a group of persons with complete equality, the spendthrift will soonfall into difficulties and will again look on the fortune of his comrades with greed and envy. Further, onphilosophic and psychological grounds, it seems that inthe very interest of human society, it is desirable thatthere should be grades in wealth, the poorer having thedesire and incentive to work harder. On the other hand,if everybody is told that even if he works more than whatis required of him as his duty, he would get no rewardand would remain as those who do not do more than theirduty, then one would become lazy and neglectful, andone's talent would be wasted to the great misfortune of humanity.338/a. Everyone knows that human livelihood is inconstant progress, through the domination andexploitation one after the other of all those things thatGod has created, whereas one sees that the rest of animals have changed nothing in their livelihood eversince God created their species. The cause of thisdifference, as discovered by biologists, is thesimultaneous existence of a society – a co-operation,and a liberty of competition inside the members of thesociety, i.e., human beings. Whereas other animalssuffer from the lack of some or all of these requisiteconditions. Dogs, cats and snakes for instance do notcreate even a family, for they perpetuate their race bymeans of free and momentary "love". Others, such ascrows and pigeons do create a family in the form of couples yet even if the male helps in the construction of the nest, each member in the ‘couple’ depends on itsown gain for its livelihood. Perhaps the most developedsocial co-operation is found among bees, ants andtermites (white ants). They live in a collective way, withcomplete equality in livelihood, yet without anycompetition among its members, and consequently it isnot possible for the more intelligent or more industriousbee to live more comfortably than others. For thisreason there is neither evolution nor change, much lessprogress in any of these species, as against the humanrace. The past history of man shows that every advanceand every discovery of the means of comfort came intoexistence through competition and desire forimprovement, and also through the existence of gradesof wealth or poverty among men. Yet, absolute libertywould lead devilish men to exploit the needy, and drawthem out gradually. So it was necessary for everyprogressive civilization and every healthy culture toimpose certain duties on its members (such as the to paytaxes, the interdiction of having recourse to oppressionand cheating, etc.), and to recommend certainsupererogatory acts (like charity and expenditure for the
 
2
sake of God), yet to nevertheless have a great deal of liberty of thought and action to its members, so that eachone benefits himself, his family, his friends and thesociety at large. This is the exigency of Islam, and it alsoconforms to nature.339. It is on the basis of this fundamental principle thatIslam has constructed its economic system. If ittolerates the minority of the rich, it imposes on themheavier obligations: they have to pay taxes in the interestof the poor, and they are prevented from practisingimmoral means of exploitation, hoarding andaccumulation of wealth. For this end there will be someorders or injunctions, and also some recommendations– for charity and sacrifice – with the promise of spiritual (other-worldly) reward. Further it makes on theone hand, a distinction between the necessary minimumand the desirable plenitude, and on the other handbetween those orders and injunctions which areaccompanied by material sanctions and those which arenot so, but for which Islam contents itself withpersuasion and education only.340. We shall describe first in a few words this moralaspect. Some illustrations would enable us to betterunderstand its implications. Most emphatic terms havebeen employed by Islam to show that to beg charity of others is something abominable, and it would be asource of shame on the day of Resurrection. Yetsimultaneously, unlimited praise has been bestowed onthose who come to the aid of the others, the best of menbeing in fact those who make a sacrifice and preferothers to their own selves. Similarly avarice and wasteare both prohibited. One day the Prophet of Islam hadneed of considerable funds for some public cause. Oneof his friends brought a certain sum to offer as hiscontribution, and on the demand of the Prophet, hereplied: "I have left at home nothing but the love of Godand of His messenger." This person received thewarmest praise from the Prophet. Yet on anotheroccasion, another companion of his, who was seriouslyill, told him when he came to inquire about his health: "Omessenger of God! I am a rich man, and I want to bequestall that I possess for the welfare of the poor." TheProphet replied, "
No; it is better to leave to thyrelatives an independent means of livelihood thanthat they should be dependent on others and beobliged to beg
." Even for two-thirds and for a half of the possessions the remark of the Prophet was, "
that istoo much
." When the proposal was submitted to giveone-third of the property in charity, he said: "
Well, eventhe third is a large amount
." (cf. Bukhari). One day theProphet saw one of his companions in miserable attire.On enquiry, he replied: "O messenger of God! I am notat all poor; only I prefer to spend my wealth on the poorrather than on my own self." The Prophet remarked: "
No;God likes to see on His slave traces of the bountythat He has accorded him!
" (cf. Abu Da'wud andTirmidhi). There is no contradiction in these directions;each has its own context and relates to distinct individualcases. We are afforded an opportunity of determiningthe limits of the discretionary choice in excess of theobligatory minimum,
vis-à-vis
the other members of society.
Inheritance
341. Both the individual right of disposing of one'swealth and the right of the collectivity
vis-à-vis
thewealth of each individual, in as much as one is a memberof society, have to be simultaneously satisfied.Individual temperaments differ enormously. Sickness orother accidents may also affect a man out of allproportion. So it is necessary that a certain disciplineshould be imposed upon him in the interest of thecollectivity.342. Thus Islam has taken two steps: firstly theobligatory distribution of the goods of a deceasedperson among his close relatives, and secondly arestriction on the freedom of bequest through wills andtestaments. The legal heirs do not require anytestamentary disposition, and inherit the property of thedeceased in the proportions determined by law. Atestament is required solely in favour of those who haveno right to inherit from a deceased person.343. There is equality in the parents of the samecategory, and one cannot award to one son (elder oryounger) more than to the other – whether major orminor. The first charges on the property left by thedeceased are the expenses of his burial. What remainsthen goes to his creditors, the debt having priority overthe "rights" of the inheritors. In the third place, histestament is executed, to the measure and extent that itdoes not exceed the third of the available property (afterburial and payment of debts). It is only after satisfyingthese prior obligations that heirs are considered. The(male or female) partner of life, the parents, thedescendants (sons and daughters) are the first classheirs, and inherit in all cases. Brothers and sisters, andother more remote relatives inherit from a deceased
 
3
person only in the absence of nearer relatives. Amongthese more remote relatives, we find uncles, aunts,cousins, nephews and others.344. Without entering into technical details, certainbasic rules may be described. A homicide is excludedfrom the inheritance of his own victim, even if the courtdecides that it was a case of death by involuntaryaccident. The underlying idea seems to be to prevent alltemptation to kill a rich relative in view of an earlierinheritance. The Prophet has also prohibited inheritanceamong relatives of different religions, even between thehusband and wife. However, the right of donating giftsand testament can be availed of in this respect. TheMuslim husband, for instance, may bequest, even on hisdeath-bed, a part of his property in favour of hisnon-Muslim wife. On the strength of the internationaland political conditions of their times, the classicalMuslim jurists have instituted another hindrance,
viz 
.,the difference of the territory (i.e., political nationality)as barring inheritance. Evidently the statal treaties mayregulate the question of private international law, in acontrary sense, on the basis of reciprocity.345. In countries where the Islamic law of inheritance isnot applied by governments, yet the right of testament isrecognized, the Muslim inhabitants can (and must)utilize this facility, in order to fulfill their religious dutywith regard to the disposition of their property aftertheir death.
Wills
346. We have just mentioned that the right of testamentary bequests is operative only within the limitsof a third of the property, in favour of persons other thancreditors and heirs. The aim of this rule seems to betwo-fold: (1) To permit an individual to adjust things, inextraordinary cases, when the normal rule causeshardship; and a third of the property is sufficient forfulfilling all such moral duties. (2) Another motive of the law of the will is to prevent the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few, a thing which would happenif one should give all this property, by will, to a singleperson excluding totally one's near relatives. Islamdesires the circulation of wealth among as large anumber of people as possible, taking into account theinterests of the family.
Public Goods
347. One also has obligations as a member of a largerfamily,
viz.
, society and the State in which one lives. Inthe economic sphere, one pays taxes, which thegovernment redistributes in the interests of thecollectivity.348. The taxation rate differs according to the variouskinds of the sources of income, and it is interesting tonote that the Qur'an, which gives precise directions withregard to budgetary expenditure, has enunciated neitherrules nor rates of the income of the State. Whilescrupulously respecting the practice of the Prophet andof his immediate successors, this silence of the Qur'anmay be interpreted as giving a latitude to the governmentto change the rules for income according tocircumstances, in the interest of the people.349. In the time of the Prophet, there were agriculturaltaxes, and the peasants handed over a tenth of the harvest,provided it was above a certain taxless minimum andirrigated their lands with rain or spring water, and half that rate in the case of wells as the means of irrigation.In commerce and exploitation of mines, one paid 2½%of the value of goods. As for import taxes on foreigncaravan-leaders, there is an interesting fact which shouldprofitably be brought into relief. In the time of theProphet, these were subject to a tithe as customs duty.The caliph 'Umar reduced by half this tax on foreigners,concerning certain categories of victuals imported inMadinah (as reported by Abu 'Ubaid). This precedent of high authority casts light on the essential principles of the fiscal policy of Islam. In the time of the Prophet,there were taxes on herds of camels, sheep and goats,and oxen provided they were fed on public pastures andexceeded in number the taxless minimum. Exemptionwas accorded further to beasts of burden and thoseemployed for ploughing and irrigation.350. There was a tax of 2½% on savings on silver andgold. This obliged people to employ their wealth forincrease, and not to indulge in idle hoarding.351. The Qur'an (9:60) has prescribed the principlesregulating the budget of State expenditure in Islam, inthe following terms: "
Verily the
 sadaqa
(i.e., taxes onMuslims)
are only for the needy, and the poor, and those who work for these
(taxes)
 , and those whosehearts are to be reconciled, and to free the necks
(i.e.,slaves and prisoners of war),
and the heavily charged,and in the path of God, and for the wayfarer-a dutyimposed by God; God is Knower, Wise
." These eight
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...