Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)

Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 554|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that the respondent was ineligible to adjust to lawful permanent residence under Section 245(k) of the INA because she previously engaged in unauthorized employment for more than 180 days as a student in F-1 status. The Board found that the respondent’s parole into the United States following the period of unauthorized employment did not restart the 180-day clock. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane and joined by Member Ana Mann and Member Garry Malphrus.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that the respondent was ineligible to adjust to lawful permanent residence under Section 245(k) of the INA because she previously engaged in unauthorized employment for more than 180 days as a student in F-1 status. The Board found that the respondent’s parole into the United States following the period of unauthorized employment did not restart the 180-day clock. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane and joined by Member Ana Mann and Member Garry Malphrus.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 25, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/01/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Burton, Justin

EsquireKrezelma, Buon
&
 Assocates, LC20 Noh Cak Steet, Sute 725hicago, IL 60602Name: BJK, ANNA MAGDAENA
US   
Executve Oce r Immigaion Review
Bd  ppOc  h Ck
507 Leburg Pike, Sute 000Fals Chc Vgna 04
OHS/C ce f he Counse -CHI525 West Van Buen SteetChicago, I 60607 A 089-059-545Date of ths notce:9/30/2013
Ecosed s a copy of he Boad's decisio ad orde  he above-reeced case.cosre
Pl Mb: Hgh G A G 
Scerely,
D

c
Doa Cr Chef Cerk
T
m:
k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)
 
t
US
Dpatmt of Jtc
Executive Oce r Imaon ReviewDecison of te Bod of Imatio AppealsFas Chc, Vign
041
FileA089 059 545 -Chco, ILDe:In e AA MAGDALENA BOJKON EMOVA PROCEEDNGSAPPAON EHALF OF RESPONDENTJuin  Bon EquieON BEHALF OF DHS J. WoolAan e CounelAPPLICATON Ajuen o u
SEPao 21
The eponen  nve an cizen o Pol, pel om e Immion Jue'ecion e Novembe 29 2011, enyin he enewe jumen o u pliion une econ 245() o e Immon an Noniy Ac "A), 8 USC § 1255(). eeonen w ane onay epue une ecion 2Bb) o he A, 8 .SC§ 229cb
)(.
Te Depmen o omen Secy e  be n ooo Te pewll be mieWe evew  cle eo he nn o c, ncluin e eenon o ceibiiy,me by he Immion ue 8 CFR § 1003()(3)) We eview e novo  ohe iue,nclun whehe he e hve me he elevan buen o poo, an iue o iceion8 .FR § 131 (3)i) Te plc  elie om emov be he uen o oo oebih e uoy  iceiony eby  jume o 
ee
econ2(c))A) o e Ac, 8 C § 1229c)4)A); 8 CFR § 208();
see ls Mter fZmr
25 &N Dec 606, 09 (A 2011).The eponen e vou umen on ppel. On eview, we uhol he mmionJue'eemnion h he eonen  no mee he buen o eblh eiibliy  jumeno u une econ 25) o he A (  58)The eco eec  heeponen e hvn been ne  chne o u om  H2B emoy woke o  Fuen n Seembe 206, ene n nuhoze empoyme J 
;
Exh 2, Exh. 3 Tb A, D,  T  379 
ee
eco 25c)8)  25k o e A econ27A(h)(3) o he A 8 .S.C  32(h)(3) 8 CF  274c)(9), 245(b)() Teeco nes h e eonen onne he empomen  oe an Fs seom Sepembe 200 unl he eceve he employmen uhoizion ca n Auu 07  peo h eceee 80 y (J  8 Eh 2, Exh. 3  Tb A, E T.  3739, 41) The
Depe he eponen eon on ppe he Immon Je poely eece hiiicion ove he eponen' enewe pplcion  jumen o u
he qlieue he avn ien eepon (eponen' B  7)
ee
8 CF  2452()()()
ter iitng
25 I&N ec 8 (BIA 2009)
see s Mtter fArrby,
25 &N Dec 771(BIA 202)
Cite as: Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)
 
A09 059 545responden dd not poe evdence o show a she, as a F- student, had auoition o beeployed a Joe and anks auage" o epeber 206 to August 207, hs ng odeonstrae ha she d no violate e tes of er - student saus, or tha she ws not bedo adusg satus because se ad engaged  atozed eployen (J at 8; xh 2,Ex 3 a Tabs A, D, E; r at 37-3, 41)
See
secons 245(c)() d 245(k) of e Ac;
 see also
8 CR  22((9), 274a2(c)(3), 245(b)()The respondent has not addess s sseon appealMoreover, the espondent as not deonstaed hat se is centy n lau staus  puoses of adjustment o satus e responden admed that she is no onger eployed bJoe ad ranks Sausage" because it wen ou o business n 20, and ha she staed wokngr a new eploye n 20 (J at 7; xh 7; r a 35-37) Howee, he respondent dd no poe a labo ceicaion and n approved empomen-based sa petion (Fo -40) toesablsh the poabilty of he new emploent nde sectn 24) of the Act,  .C. 154).
See, e.g,
T a 47-49;
 see generally Matter f arca[ Net,
25 &N ec. 69,175-76 (BIA 20) (sating ha the Imigaton ge as the auty to deermine whethe the vadiy of alien's approed eployent-based visa petiton is peseed ude section20) o he Act ae he alen has changed jobs or eples). She also did not proeevdence o establsh tha she s othewse egbe to adjust sas based on  mant sa  tha s edately avalable t he
ee, eg,
T at 47-9)
ee
secton 245(a)(3) o he Ac;8 CFR  1245 he respondent has not addessed ese ssues on appeaIn addtion, we e no pesuaded by the respondent's gumens on appea hat any perid of  nlawl stas at occured prior o her Ocober 20 poe nto te Uned Sates s eean o her elgbly r adusent of saus (Respondents Br at 5-6)For purposes o secon25(k)o e Ac, he espondent's paroe nto he ned tates in Ocober 20 dd noconste a lawl adsso d her prole dd no esa he 8-day perod cock
ee
eorandu om Donald Neufeld, Actng Associae Drecto, oesic Operatons  CS,QDOMO 70/231-P AD06-07,
Aplicabili of ection 245) to Certan Employment-Based Austment o tatus Applcations Fled Under Secin 245(a) of the Immgaion and  Nanali ct 
(Juy , 200);
 see generay Matter of Arraally, sura,
at 777;
c Samirah
v
 Holder,
627 Fd 652, 65-60 (7 Cir 210)Becaue he respondent is nelgible r adjusen of saus unde secon 245(k) o he Act,she did no ee her buden to establsh her elgibty  adjusment of satus nde section245(a) o he Ac
See
sectons 240(c)(4)(A) d 25(a) o e Act;  CFR  124.(d) Inlight of our dispostion, we need nt address the oter guments ased on appeal and we dno basis to reand e case r her proceedngs
ee N 

Bagamasbad,
 29 S 2, 25-26(1976);
Matter ofH,
23 & ec 462, 66 (BIA 2002)The aon Jdges erence o e respodents pole n Agus 2 28" s a  haless scvenes eror (.J at 2)
3
Alhough no binding on he Boad, he C eoandu ced provdes uel, pactcgudace at s not contadced by secon 25(k) of e Act r y reated reglaons.
Cite as: Anna Magdalena Bojko, A089 059 545 (BIA Sept. 30, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->