Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Luis Perez, A200 687 958 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)

Luis Perez, A200 687 958 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 317|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied the respondent’s motion to reopen upon finding that the granting of a petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) did not constitute an “admission” for purposes of determining inadmissibility in removal proceedings. The decision was written by Member Neil Miller.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied the respondent’s motion to reopen upon finding that the granting of a petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) did not constitute an “admission” for purposes of determining inadmissibility in removal proceedings. The decision was written by Member Neil Miller.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 25, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/14/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Cruz Hen EsqRos Cator P.S811 Fst Avenue Sute340Seale A 98104Name PEREZ LIS
   
Executive Oce r Immigration Revew
B  Immgn A  h k
 5107
Lbu  g Su
2000 
a Cu,   gnia 
20530 
OHSICE ice of Chief Consel -AC1623East 
Steet Ste 2acoma, A 98421 A 200-687-958ate of ths notice10/3/ 2013
Encosed s a copy of the Board's decision ad order in the above-rerenced case.ncosure
 bM Nl P
Sncerely,
D
U
C
aA
Donna Carr Cief Clerk
 
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Luis Perez, A200 687 958 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
 
PEREZ LUIS A200-687-958NWC1623E.
STREE, SUE 5 TACMA WA 9821Name: PEREZ LUIS
  of 
xectve Ofe r Immgraton Revew
B  Immn A  h k
 5107
Leesbur  gPike, Sute
2000 
Falls Church. Vrgna 
2050 
OHSICE ice of Chief Consel -AC1623East 
Street Ste 2 acoma
WA
9821 A 200-687-958Date of this notice10/3/ 2013
ncosed s a copy of the Bod's deson n the abovererened case Ths copy s bengrovded to yo
a coesy Yor attoey or representatve as been served wth thsdecson prsan to
8
CFR § 1295(a)  the atached decson orders hat yo beremoved om the Unted States or arms an Immgraton Jdge's decson orderng that yobe remove any petton r revew of the attached deson st be ed wth a reevedby the approprate ort of appeas whn
3
days of the date of the desonncosre
  N P
Sncerey
D
 
c
t
Donna Car Chef Cerk
k: k
Cite as: Luis Perez, A200 687 958 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
 
.
U.S Depament of Jstie
Executive Oe r Immraton RevewDes f the Brd ommato ApealsFas
Church,
Vga 
22041
File:200 687 958 -Tacoma WAIn e LU PEZN REMOVA ROCDNGMOIONON BEHAF OF RESONDENTHe Cz, EsquieLATON ReconsideatonDate
CT� .a 2
'
his case was last bee he Boa o July 9, 20 whe we ismissed e espodent'sappea of the Imigaton Jude's dea o he espoent's aplication  adjusment o saune section 245 o the mmiaton ad Nationaiy ct, 8 U.
§
1255, nd e espondent's euest to teinate the poceeigs. The espoent as ed a timely moton to econsideou ecison8 
§
003.2(b). he Depaent of Home Sect  not  esponded to the moton wic wll be deeA moon to econsie shl speci "eos o ct o law in he o Bod ecison nsal be supoe by peinent authoity 8 CR.
§
1002b);
 see lso Mter of 0-S-G
2I&N Dec 5 (BA 2006) he espondent as cite no egal atoty at convices us of eo n ou decso o the Iiation Judge's ecision beow he esonent eteates manyo te gments n his appelate be We consieed tese gmens d  hemunpesuasive bee ismissing the esponent's appea
 See Mter of 0-SG-, supr
at 58(statin that a otion to econside s no a pocess by which a paty may submt n essence, ese bef pesente o apeal  ) Noithstaning the esponent's aleations wecnsee al of te voable ctos supoti he esponent's adset of stausappcaon Bt gven the sigcant avese consideations, e esponent id t adeqateyshow hat a voabe exese o iscetion was wr nte.Fe e espondent -eng on
Grci
v.
Holder
659 F3d 26 (9h C 201) eteates hs cam hat he was no onge emovable and his oceens should have bee teinatewhen hs pecia Immigat Juvenle (SIJ) pettio w gtedBut 
rc
v
Holder supr
does not aess nadmissbiy  puposes of emova poceedinsae that ecson hols at the appoval of an IJ etion ls wthn e boad mewoko "havng been admted n any status  puposes of an inadmssbe alie estabishing theye cotiuos pysca pesece equieme  ccelato o emova ue sectio2Aa of the Act 8 C
§
29b(a As we explaned in ou ecision n mmit whoas been gted stats is considee to have been ole ito the nite Sates  poses of usting sas unde section 245(a of the Act
 See
Secton 245)() of e Act But nee secton 245(h), no 
Grci

Holder supr
alteed te esondent's admssbliy  poses emova poceegs
Cite as: Luis Perez, A200 687 958 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->