• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
iUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKSONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,INC. et al.,Plaintiffs,- against -DOES 1 - 40,Defendants.:::::::Case No. 04-cv-00473
MEMORANDUM OF AMICI CURIAEPUBLIC CITIZEN, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND
 
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATIONIN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO QUASHTABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
 
STATEMENT.....................................................................................................1
 
II.
 
ARGUMENT......................................................................................................2
 
A.
 
Balancing the Right to Anonymous Speech Against the Need forDisclosure........................................................................................................3
 
B.
 
Personal Jurisdiction......................................................................................10
 
C.
 
Joinder............................................................................................................12
 
D.
 
Suppression or Return of Disclosed Identity Information............................16
 
III.
 
CONCLUSION.................................................................................................17
 
 
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESCases
 
 AFGE v. HUD
, 351 F.3d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1997).......................................................7
 AFL-CIO v. FEC 
, 333 F.3d 168 (D.C. Cir. 2003).....................................................8
 ALS Scan v. Digital Service Consultants
, 293 F.3d 707 (4
th
Cir. 2002)..................10
 Baker v. F&F Investment 
, 470 F.2d 778 (2d Cir.1972).............................................5
 Bates v. City of Little Rock 
, 361 U.S. 516 (1960)......................................................8
 Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King
, 126 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 1997)............................10
 Black Panther Party v. Smith
, 661 F.2d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1981)................................8
 BMG Music et al. v. Does 1-203
, Civil Action no. 04-650(E.D. Pa. March 5, 2005).....................................................................................13
Carey v. Hume,
492 F.2d 631 (D.C. Cir. 1974).........................................................5
Cervantes v. Time,
464 F.2d 986 (8
th
Cir. 1972).......................................................5
Citigroup v. City Holding Co.
, 97 F.Supp.2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).......................10
Columbia Ins. Co. v. Seescandy.com
, 185 FRD 573 (N.D.Cal. 1999)..................7, 9
 Dendrite v. Doe
, 775 A.2d 756 (N.J.App. 2001)...................................................5, 9
 Ealy v. Littlejohn
, 569 F.2d 219 (5
th
Cir. 1978).....................................................5, 8
 Eldred v. Ashcroft 
, 123 S.Ct. 769 (2003)...................................................................5
Guest v. Leis
, 255 F.3d 325 (6
th
Cir. 2001)................................................................7
 Harper & Row Pub. v. Nation Enterprises
, 471 U.S. 539 (1985).............................5
 In re Ski Train Fire
, 2003 WL 22909153 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)....................................10
 
iii
 In re Verizon Internet Svces
, 257 F.Supp.2d 244 (D.D.C. 2003),
rev’d on other grounds
, 351 F.3d 1229 (D.C. Cir.)...............................................4
 In re Vitamins Antitrust Litig.
, 2000 WL 1475705 (D.D.C.)..................................14
 Interscope Records v. Does 1-25
, Case No. 6:04-cv-197-Orl-22DAB(M.D.Fla. April 1, 2004)......................................................................................13
K.C.P.L., Inc. v. Nash
, 1998 WL 823657 (S.D.N.Y 1998).....................................10
Kenvin v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.,
37 F.R.D. 473
 
(S.D.N.Y.1965).......................14
 La Societe Metro Cash & Carry France v. Time Warner Cable,
 2003 WL 22962857 (Conn. Super.).......................................................................6
 Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
, 104 F.R.D. 103(S.D.N.Y. 1985)...................................................................................................16
 McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm.
, 514 U.S. 334 (1995).........................................8
 Melvin v. Doe
, 49 Pa.D.&C.4th 449 (2000),
appeal quashed 
, 789 A.2d 696, 2001 Pa.Super. 330 (2001),
appeal reinstated 
, 836 A.2d 42 (Pa. 2003)............................................................6
 Miller v. Transamerican Press, Inc.
, 621 F.2d 721 (5
th
Cir. 1980)...........................5
 Mink v. AAAA Development 
, 190 F.3d 333 (5
th
Cir. 1999).....................................10
 Movie Systems v. Abel
, 99 F.R.D. 129 (D. Minn. 1983)..........................................14
 NAACP v. Alabama
, 357 U.S. 449 (1958).................................................................8
 Nassau County Assoc. of Insurance Agents, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
,497 F.2d 1151 (2d Cir. 1974)...............................................................................14
 Nassau Cy. Ass’n of Ins. Agents v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co.
, 497 F.2d 1151(2d Cir. 1974).......................................................................................................15
 Neogen Corp. v. Neo Gen Screening
, 282 F.3d 883 (6
th
Cir. 2002)........................10
Oklahoma Press Publ'g Co. v. Walling
, 327 U.S. 186 (1946)..................................8
Pergo v. Alloc
, 262 F.Supp.2d 122 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).................................12, 13, 14
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...