Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
131027-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Virginia Trioli- The KING is NOT DEAD

131027-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Virginia Trioli- The KING is NOT DEAD

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4|Likes:

More info:

Published by: Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka on Oct 27, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/27/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
 p1 27-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See alsoHttp://www.schorel-hlavka.comFax 03 8692 2727 Email:admin@inspector-rikati.com 
WITHOUT PREJUDICE 
Virginia Trioli 27-10-2013C/o 
 Virginia,
THE KING ISNOTDEAD
!5In your article headed VIRGINIA TRIOLI / THE KING IS DEAD you stated;
“Roxon wants to see the return of the true ministerial system, with clear delegation, clea
autonomy and authority, and the ability for all to be heard within a robust and respectful10governing group. It takes a particular strong individual to allow all that. Not a messiah, nota god. But a thoughtful, smart, secure, emotionally, intelligent adult. Let me know when
you next spot one.”
 I am alive and well, just that you never were aware of this. Read my articles published on my15 blog at www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati and you may just realize that I am the person peopleneed and/or have been looking for..
I made a formal complaint to the AEC (Australian Electoral Commission) against Clive Palmer’s
advertisement to vote for Clive Palmer for Prime Minister, I held as a
CONSTITUTIONALIST
 20that this advertisement was DECEPTIVE and MISLEADING. (The advertisement was that dayimmediately withdrawn, subsequently to my complaint also having been emails to PUP!)QUOTE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE 
25
Australian Electoral Commission
2-9-2013info@aec.gov.au?Cc: Mr Michael King, Returning officer, JAGAJAGAPalmer United Party: candidates@palmerunited.com,
30
Ref: 130902-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Australian Electoral Commission - COMPLAINTS
35
Sir,as you may recall from the 19 July 2006 County Court of Victoria decision to uphold both appeals on
FAILINGTO VOTE
, where I comprehensively defeated the Commonwealth, on that as a
CONSTITUTIONALIST
Isubmitted that the Framers of the Constitution refused to give the Commonwealth legislative powers to compel any person to register or to vote in elections. As I submitted to the court, I am not against voting but against compulsory
40
voting, and the AEC didn’t oppose this and other submissions based upon constitutional grounds.
 http://aec.gov.au/FAQs/Voting_Australia.htm#compulsory
END QUOTE
 
 
 p2 27-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See alsoHttp://www.schorel-hlavka.comFax 03 8692 2727 Email:admin@inspector-rikati.com 
QUOTE
I have a further complaint against what I view is false/misleading election advertising by
Palmer UnitedParty
and obviously the question may be asked if the AEC approved this advertising, and if so, why?On Monday Afternoon on 2 September 2013 between about 4 and 6 pm I heard over the radio a politicalannouncements by
Palmer United Party
, with various people, including a lawyer, to say something like to
5
vote for Clive Palmer as Prime Minister.I must admit that also leaders of political parties tend to argue people are voting for who shall be the nextPrime Minister. I view the AEC has for too long failed to act against this kind of deceptive conduct, even sothis already was occurring even when former Queensland Jo Belkje-Peterson was campaigning to becomePrime Minister.
10
Constitutionally no one can vote for anyone to be voted in as Prime Minister. While there is a convention thatgenerally the Governor-General appoints the leader of the political party which can have the support of mostof the Members of the House of Representatives, this is nothing but a convention and cannot override what isconstitutionally applicable.
END QUOTE15
Whatever was wrong with Kevin Rudd I view he didn’t deserve Nicola Roxon to try to
 bury himwhile still alive, just perhaps as to make her own performance perceived to be better.As an Attorney-General I held she was clumsy at best, if not completely irresponsible andderelict of her duties, and failing to understand the constitutional implications of her decisions,20such as relating to backdating of jurisdiction of the Family Court of Australia in blatant violationof the federal compact, etc. She cannot blame Kevin Rudd, and neither former Attorney-
General’s, or even Julia Gillard for her own grave errors. The fact that people didn’t
wake up to
it all doesn’t
mean they
didn’t make them.
 .25
HANSARD
10-3-1898
Constitution Convention Debates
(
Official Record of the Debates of the NationalAustralasian Convention
)QUOTE
Mr. BARTON
(New South Wales).-
Then, again, there is the prerogative right to declare war and peace, an adjunct of which it is that theQueen herself, or her representative, where Her Majesty is not present, holds that prerogative. No one
30
would ever dream of saying that the Queen would declare war or peace without the advice of aresponsible Minister.
END QUOTE
HANSARD
6-3-1891
Constitution Convention Debates
(
Official Record of the Debates of the National
35
Australasian Convention
)QUOTE
Mr. DEAKIN:
We can make an exception in favour of imperial interests.
We have no desire to interferewith the imperial prerogative in matters of war and peace!
END QUOTE
40.
Let’s be clear about it, John Howard was never validly elected in 2001 and neither had any
constitutional powers to authorise an armed invasion into Iraq, so why is he and his fellowMinisters not standing trial for war crimes, crimes against humanity, etc? This is because not justKevin Rudd, but also Julia Gillard, and their supporters (M
inisters) couldn’t give a damn.
 45Robert Menzies allegedly held that because England was at war then the Commonwealth of Australia was likewise, this even so unless and until the Governor-General published in theGazette a DECLARATION OF WAR (against the relevant nation) the Commonwealth of Australia was
NOT AT ALL
at war. This, as in the Commonwealth of Australia s68 providedthe powers of the armed forces to the Governor-General and not to the Monarch.50Peter Garrett as I understood it tried to blame Kevin Rudd for the insulation debacle, but realityis that the Cabinet can only make a decision to a policy but ulti
mately the “responsible Minister”
as Peter Garrett then was, makes the final decision. I wrote then that the insulation scheme would be unconstitutional, but he as well as Kevin Rudd ignored this, but as the Framers of the55
 
 
 p3 27-10-2013
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVDA 1
st
edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD
ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE
: You may order books in the
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series
by making a reservation, See alsoHttp://www.schorel-hlavka.comFax 03 8692 2727 Email:admin@inspector-rikati.com 
Constitution made clear t
he Minister is the “responsible Minister.” Hence, in the end Peter 
Garrett should have faced sole liability and should have been personally sued for the dead
sinvolved..
Hansard
1-3-1898 
Constitution Convention Debates
(
Official Record of the Debates of the National
5
Australasian Convention
)QUOTE
 Sir JOHN DOWNER 
.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyondthe substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and saythat there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principlethat the Ministers of the
10
Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do,
 
in the same way asany private person would be.
 END QUOTE
Ruddock as migration Minister presiding over the terrible conduct against Vivian Alvarez Solon15
copped out of being the “responsible Minister’ and let the taxpayers foot the compensation bill.
 Yet, records will show that in 2002 the Commonwealth Ombudsman then already refused toinvestigate matters, when I requested
him to do so, and he didn’t do so until 2005, when John
Howard then requested this.20Let us be clear about it, the Governor-General cannot be appointed upon recommendation of theAustralian Government, as to do so make the Governor-General a lapdog of the government. Asthe Framers of the Constitution made clear:
HANSARD
26-3-1897 
Constitution Convention Debates
 QUOTE
 Mr. LYNE:
 
25
First of all, he raised the question of the appointment of the Governor-General for the FederalExecutive. Now, I think there is no desire on the part of any large section of this community to takewhat I may term the first step towards a severance from the mother-country, but the first step wouldbe in the election of the Governor-General instead of allowing his appointment to be made by the HomeGovernment. It is but a small connecting link between the Australasian colonies-between a Federated
30
Australia and the mother-country-to allow the appointment to be made by the Home Government;andI should like to know what power that Government would have over any Governor-General elected inthe manner desired.
 END QUOTE
35Even Isaac Isaacs was not validly appointed as Governor-General!.To have an Australian as Governor-General then without a viable monarchy in theCommonwealth of Australia then it must be one elected by the people.
Hansard
2-3-1898 
Constitution Convention Debates
 
40
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON
( South Australia ).-In the preamble honorable members will find that what we desire to do is to unite in one indissoluble FederalCommonwealth -that is the political Union-"
under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britainand Ireland
, and under the Constitution hereby established." Honorable members will therefore see that the
45
application of the word Commonwealth is to the political Union which is sought to be established. It is notintended there to have any relation whatever to the name of the country or nation which we are going to createunder that Union . The second part of the preamble goes on to say that it is expedient to make provision for the admission of other colonies into the Commonwealth.
That is, for admission into this political Union,which is not a republic, which is not to be called a dominion, kingdom, or empire, but is to be a Union
50
by the name of "Commonwealth," and I do not propose to interfere with that in the slightest degree.
 END QUOTE
Our current system of elections provide for gangster mobs parading as political parties to decidewhich one of their bosses shall run the Commonwealth of Australia. Indeed, we have seen that55like Palmer United Party the monies they receive unconstitutionally for payment per primary
vote is not spend on “educating” electors (as was claimed by the political parties t
he funds was to

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->