Plaintiffs are nfonned and believe that Defendant s an ndividual
residing n this District.34
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHTS6
Plaintiffs incorporatehereinby this referenceeachand every
allegationcontained n eachparagraphabove.
Plaintiffs are, and at all relevant imes havebeen, he copyright02ownersor licensees f exclusive ights under United States opyright with respectto certaincopyrightedsound ecordings, ncluding but not limited to thecopyrightedsound ecordings dentified in Exhibit A attached ereto,eachof
which is the subjectof a valid Certificate of Copyright Registration ssuedby the
Registerof Copyrights the "CopyrightedRecordings").6
10. Among the exclusive ights granted o eachPlaintiff under heCopyright Act are he exclusive ights to reproduce he CopyrightedRecordings!and o distribute he CopyrightedRecordings o the pub1ic.
21Plaintiffs are nformed and believe hat Defendant,without thepennissionor consentof Plaintiffs, has used,and continues o use,an online media
distribution ystemo downloadhe Copyrighted ecordings,o distribute he
CopyrightedRecordings o the public, and/or o make he CopyrightedRecordingsavailable or distribution to others. In doing so, Defendanthas violated Plaintiffs'
exclusive ights of reproductionand distribution. Defendant's ctionsconstitute27infringementof Plaintiffs' copyrightsand exclusive ights under copyright.
(Exhibit B containsa complete isting of files Defendanthas madeavailable or
Mitchell Silbcrtl«a A