• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
R IC H A R D 1.FIN E
PrisonerID # 1824367
c/o M en's C entral Jail
44 1 B auch et Street
LosAngeles,CA 90012
U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S
F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT
RIC HARD 1.FIN E,
A ppellant an d Petitioner,
V S.
C ase N o.
EM ERGEN CY M OTIO N TO
IM M ED IA TELY R ELEA SE
A PPELLA N T FIN E FRO M
IN CARCERA TIO N PEN DIN G
APPEAL,OR PERM ANENTLY ,
AND IM M EDIA TEISY GRANT
TI4EW RIT ASYHEREW ASNO
DO SITIO N TO 11'1-1-E P l\u00ef'1'lT lO N
O Pl
FO R W R IT O F H A B EA S CO RPU S,
D UE PROCESS W A S VIO LATED
BY JU DGE YAFFE'S REFUSAL
T O R E C U SE H IM SE L F ,D U E
PROCESSW ASVIO LATED BY
Tl4E A C TIO N S OF Tl-m
M A G ISTR A TE JLJD G E A N D T1-l/
D IST R IC T C O LJR T JU D G E , A N D
T l4E M A G IST R A T E JIJD G E 'S
REPORT & RECOM M END ATIO N
D1D N OT REFER TO OR FOLLOW
THE LA TEST SIJPREM E COU RT
PRE CED EN T
U .S .D IS T R IC T C O IJR T ,
A ppellee and R espondent.
SH ERIF F O F IXO S A N G CLV\u00eeS
COUN TY
(R ea l P arty ln lnterest)
Case: 09-56073 07/10/2009 Page: 1 of 25
DktEntry: 6988781
l
TABLE O F CONTENTS
2
1 lltro tltle tiO f1 ................................................................................:1rror! 1)ookm \u00e9trlk r1ot (lesne (l.
3
1. \u00e9\u00e7unconstitutional''and lllegal LA County Paym ents to LA Superior CourtJudge D avid
4
P . Y affe V iolated the D ue P rocess C lause and M andated H is R ecusal...... .. ............ 4
5
l1. -1-l1e 13 kltitit)ll 17 ()r 'p/rit () 17 l-lftllklgts (y () Iynlzs is l-lrltll)ln()sklkl .......-...............................-.............. 1 ()
67
111. T h e D istrict C ourt V iolated T he D ue P rocess C lause..........E rror! B ookm ark n ot defined .l
8
A.
M agistrate Judge W oehrle and Judge W alter Should H ave R ecused Them selvesE rror!B okm ark nt
9
.....- .
. .-
13 . 1.l7.e tlistric't Czourt Aliolated 28 IJ'SCr j 2243 . - ................ ....- .................................. ...- ... 13
l0
lV . R eport and R ecom m endation A pproved by the C otu't V iolated D ue Process E rror!B ookm
not defin/
11
V . This Case is the Latest A ttem pt of the California Judges to D eny M eaningful A ecess to
12
the C ourts and Preventthe Fair Flm ctionin g of the C alifornia JudicialSystem.................1.6
13
V 1- 1Niec e S Sit)7 17()1- 'f\u00ef llAerj;e fltl)J 1;e1 i'e C- ................................................................................-...... l $)
l4
15
16
17
18
19.
.
.
.
.
..
.'
.
,
gg
21
.
22
.
23
.
.
:4
.. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
26
27
28
!1
ii
ip1
'l
.
.
.
Case: 09-56073 07/10/2009 Page: 2 of 25
DktEntry: 6988781
TABLE OF AUTHORIT IE S
89
Case: 09-56073 07/10/2009 Page: 3 of 25
DktEntry: 6988781
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...