This paper discusses the failure of DRM in the developed world, where it has been in widedeployment for a decade with no benefit to artists and with substantial cost to the publicand to due process, free speech and other civil society fundamentals.
Development and IP
IP regimes vary from nation to nation and reflect national development prioritiesA given nation's limitations and exceptions to copyright are a powerful means of boosting local industry and fostering domestic entrepreneursDRM can be used to overrule these priorities, so that foreign companies can trumplocal domestic policy with technological meansDRM systems make rich-country assumptions about family and domestic life thatare inappropriate to many developing countries
DRM in the developed world
DRM systems can't protect themselves, they require "anti-circumvention" laws tosilence researchers who discover their flawsAnti-circumvention laws have been used to silence and even jail researchers whoembarrassed entertainment companies and DRM vendors with revelations about thefailings in their systemsSome nations have a trade obligation to implement anti-circumvention laws, but thisobligation is less strict than many national implementations in lawThe safest course of action for government is to reject DRM in its own documentsand in documents produced by contractors
DRM systems retard innovation, putting new features under the veto of incumbentindustries who fear being out-competed by new market entrants"Renewable" DRM can be used to cheat consumers by removing or alteringfeatures after they have bought their devicesDisabled peopleCopyright law often affords rights to disabled people that trump the rights of authorsDRM lets private rightsholders unilaterally prevent the exercise of those rightsThe ability of disabled people to benefit from digital media is badly undermined byDRM
The success of the information society depends on digital content being accessible.Digital content must not locked up behind technical barriers.Libraries must not be prevented by DRM from availing themselves of their lawfulrights under national copyright law and must be able to extend their services to the3