Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Miramontes, A077 361 213 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)

Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Miramontes, A077 361 213 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 127|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for entry of a new decision where the immigration judge did not explicitly balance the positive and negative equities in denying the respondent's request for voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for entry of a new decision where the immigration judge did not explicitly balance the positive and negative equities in denying the respondent's request for voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Oct 31, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/22/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 Ali, Zulu, Esq. Law Oce of uu Al 2900 Adams Street Site C130 Riveside CA 92504
US pm of Jusi
Executive Oce r Imigration Review
Bd  Immg Al O  h Clk
5107 Leburg Pik Sut 000 Fal Churc, Vrgna 20530
HS/ICE Oice of Chie Conse -OS 606 S Oive Seet 8th Floor Los Ageles, C 90014 Nae: ALCNTRMRAMONTS JOS   A 077-361-213 Date of ts otce 10/17/2013
cosed is a copy of the Boad's decision and order i the above-rerenced case. Enclosure
P b: G Ew R.
Sincerey,
D
c
Donna Ca Chief erk
Te  Dckt
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Miramontes, A077 361 213 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)
 
I ,•
. �SDepaentfJusie
Executive Oc
r
Imaon Rvew Dcson ofhe Bord o�aon Appeals Fs Church, Vrga

il: A077 361 213 Los Angls, CA Dat
·
ocr 1 z3
'
n  JOSE DE JESS ALCANTAR-MRAMONTS a.a. Jos Jsus Alt IN ROVA PROCEEDINGAEA ON BHA O ESPONDEN Zuu Ali, Esqui  CHARGE: Nti: S 212(a)( 6)(A)(i)  N Ac [8  C
l
82(a)( 6)(A)(i)] Ps hut bing admid  paold APLICAION Adjusnt o sus voluny dparur Th spodnt has appald m h mmigati udgs dcisio dad May 7, 202 Th mmigation Judg d  spondn mvabl as chargd and dnid h spdn's appliaions  adjus o saus and volun dpaur und stis 245 ad 240B(b) o h mmigatio and Nationaiy A 8 U..C. §§ 25 d 229(b). On apal, h spod gus tat s ontold sbst nviion d n nd im inligib  adusmnt o stas inasmu as h d o ovition s ambiguus i gard o  onolld subsanc ivlvd. Th spdnt  agus at  mmigati Judg did no onsid h spondns uiis in dying is appliatin  vouay dpa. Th spondn's appal il b dismissd in p, susaind in p, and mandd  h Iigain udg  h podings h Boad vis  mmiaion Judg's ndings o  iluding ndings as o th dibiliy o stimy, und h "ly roos' stadad. 8 CFR. § 1003.(d(3(i)Th ad vis ustions o la, disin, and udgm ad all o issus in appals om disions ommiatio Judgs d novo. 8 CFR § 1003 (d(3(ii).  ill s csid h spond's m hat his cnlld ssc onvicon ds no nd him inigibl  adjustm  saus On Dmb 28 2012  spdn pld nolo ntnd in Caiia Supi Cu to possssion o a ntolld subsanc, in vilati o Caia Hah and Sa Cod 11377a (Eh 2) Convitis und aliia alh  ay d 1377(a d  agall quai as ma nss und sio 237(a)(2)(B)(i) caus "Cala la glas h possssi ad sal o numous susans ha a t similarly glad by th da Cnlld ubss At
See Ruiz-Vdal
v.
Gonles,
473 F3d 1072, 078 (9h C 2007)
 see lso Mielewck
v.
Holder
575 3d 992 (9h Ci. 2009) (quig po hat h d  convictio sho ot oly a  ais onvio invlvd a subsa hat is listd und Caliia la, but als on hat is conad in h dal schuls)
Cite as: Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Miramontes, A077 361 213 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)
 
0 36  The respondets record of covicion includes te complait hich includes one charge r ·ossessio of a cooled sbstce i vioaion of sectio (a of te Calia Helh  afey Code, d states a e sbsce was methamheie Ex 3. The record aso cos e Cerks Docke  inutes which shos at e resoe pleaded noo coendere to Con  to he chare of 3a (xh. 2 s sch he record adequatey stabshes hat the respoden adied to e cua aeaios se rh i his compnt
See Mielewczk
v
Hoder, supra
(concluing a e aie was removabe ecause the cging ocmet d the pea aeemen i his case demonsraed ha his crime invoved a ru nd i e Cs feer scees;
Une State
v.
Va
504 F 0 088 (9h Cir 00 (en b Iasmuch as the respodet is inamissibe o he Uied ates r comissio of a cooed subsce violaio under section (a(2({II of he ct 8 C. §  8(a((II e resodet is ieigie r aduste of staus. We wil ex cosider the responden's ume ha e Immigratio Jude eed in denyig his aplicaio r vory dere where he did no cosider the resode's posiive euiies i the Unied tates he Imigraion uge deie the resodents appicatio r vouary depre i he exercise of discretio aer considerig e resoen's crmna hisory d oher averse cors of record The respodes crimna istory is ceraily a egative cor weighing agais a vorable exercise of iscreio Hoever e Iigratio Judge mus demonsate a e has also considered and assied apropate weight o the positive euiies a have ee resee o e resodets ehaf
See Maer of Argele�Campos
2 I N ec 8 8 (BI 999 Uder the circmsances e wll re e record o e Imigraio Jude o eer a new decisio which ses out a more compete aysis of he positive  negaive ctors cosiered in deermining whether e responde meris a an of volnta depe in the exercise of iscreion We express o oinion as o e ulimae ocome is maer on remccordiy he loing orer w be eere ORDER The resondents apea of he dena of his apication r adusme of stas is disisse FRHER ER The respoets apeal of e de of his aplicaion r voluntry depe is susaied d the record is remanded o e Iiaion ge r her proceedings cosiset  e reoing decisio
Cite as: Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Miramontes, A077 361 213 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->