Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
12-17668 #2

12-17668 #2

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,441|Likes:
Published by Equality Case Files
Doc #2
Doc #2

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: Equality Case Files on Nov 01, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
USCA DOCKET # (IF KNOWN)Form 6. Civil Appeals Docketing Statement
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITCIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT
PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY.
TITLE IN FULL:
DISTRICT: JUDGE
:
DISTRICT COURT NUMBER:DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED:IS THIS A CROSS-APPEAL?
 G
 YESIF THIS MATTER HAS BEEN BEFORE THIS COURT PREVIOUSLY, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DOCKET NUMBER AND CITATION (IF ANY):
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTION AND RESULT BELOW:PRINCIPAL ISSUES PROPOSED TO BE RAISED ON APPEAL:PLEASE IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDING THAT MAY HAVE A BEARING ON THIS CASE (INCLUDEPENDING DISTRICT COURT POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS):DOES THIS APPEAL INVOLVE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
G
 Possibility of settlement
G
 Likelihood that intervening precedent will control outcome of appeal
G
 Likelihood of a motion to expedite or to stay the appeal, or other procedural matters (specify)
G
 Any other information relevant to the inclusion of this case in the Mediation Program
G
 Possibility parties would stipulate to binding award by Appellate Commissioner in lieu of submission to judges.
 Effective 7/1/2000
A-11a (10/00)CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENTPage 1 of 2
BEVERLY SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs,v.BRIAN SANDOVAL, in his official capacity asGovernor of the State of Nevada, et al.,Defendants.(Please see Attachment 1 for full title.)Nevada Chief Judge Jones2:12-CV-00578-RCJ-PAL
12/03/12
 Not applicable.
Plaintiffs challenged Nevada officials' refusal to allow same-sex couples to marry, or to recognize their valid marriages fromother jurisdictions, as a violation of equal protection under the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants'motion to dismiss and motions for summary judgment were granted; Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment was denied.Whether Nevada officials' refusal to allow same-sex couples to marry, or to recognize their valid marriages from other  jurisdictions, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.Pursuant to Circuit Rule 28-2.6, Plaintiffs are aware of a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit thatinvolves some issues closely related to the instant case: JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ABERCROMBIE,Defendant, et al., Case Nos. 12-16995 and 12-16998. To promote efficiency for the Court and the parties, Plaintiffsantici ate seekin leave to have their a eal heard with JACKSON v. ABERCROMBIE.
Case 2:12-cv-00578-RCJ-PAL Document 106 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 49
Case: 12-17668 12/04/2012 ID: 8424461 DktEntry: 2 Page: 1 of 49
 
Case 2:12-cv-00578-RCJ-PAL Document 106 Filed 12/03/12 Page 2 of 49
Case: 12-17668 12/04/2012 ID: 8424461 DktEntry: 2 Page: 2 of 49
 
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ATTACHMENT 1
TITLE IN FULL: BEVERLY SEVCIK and MARY BARANOVICH; ANTIOCO CARRILLO and THEODORE SMALL; KAREN GOODY and KAREN VIBE; FLETCHER WHITWELL and GREG FLAMER; MIKYLA MILLER and KATRINA MILLER; ADELE TERRANOVA and TARA  NEWBERRY; CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS and FARRELL CAFFERATA-JENKINS; and MEGAN LANZ and SARA GEIGER, Plaintiffs, v. BRIAN SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada; DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as Clerk for Clark County; AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as Clerk for Washoe County; and ALAN GLOVER, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for Carson City, Defendants, and COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE, Defendant-Intervenor.
Case 2:12-cv-00578-RCJ-PAL Document 106 Filed 12/03/12 Page 3 of 49
Case: 12-17668 12/04/2012 ID: 8424461 DktEntry: 2 Page: 3 of 49

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->