Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ - 93 2009-08-03 TAITZ Motion for Dismissal of TRO

LIBERI v TAITZ - 93 2009-08-03 TAITZ Motion for Dismissal of TRO

Ratings:

4.0

(2)
|Views: 80 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 04, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Dr.OrlyTaitz,
pro
se
OrlyTaitzLawOffices26302LaPaz,Suite
211
MissionViejo,California92691(949)683-5411drtaitz@yahoo.com
UNITEDSTATES
DISTRCTCOURT
FORTHE
EASTERN
DISTRICT
OF
PENNSYLVANIA
PHILADELPHIA
Lisa
Liberi,et
aI.,Plaintiffs,
v.
Orly
Taitz,
et
al.Defendants
§§§§
§,
§
§
CivilActionNo.2:09-cv-OI898-ERDEFENDANTS
ORL
Y
TAITZ'
&
DEFEND
OUR
FREEDOMSFOUNDATION'SOBJECTIONS
TO
ORDERS
inDocuments
81-82,
OBJECTIONS
AND
RESPONSE
TO
APPLICATION
FORTRO
in
Document
83,
andMOTION
FOR
DISMISSAL
OFTRO
OR
EMERGENCYMOTION
FOR
CONTINUANCETHISCASESHOULDBESUMMARILYDISMISSED
NOW
FollowingtheJune26,2009,hearinginthiscourt,theposture
of
thiscasewasclear:Plaintiffshadnotsatisfiedtheirburden
of
pleadingor
proof
regardingquestion
of
properjurisdictionorvenueintheEasternDistrict
of
Pennsylvania.Thesebasicprerequisitestomaintaininganactionhaveyettobesatisfied.Furthermore,tothedegreethatthisCourtexpresseditsconcernregardingpossiblepublication
of
PlaintiffLisaLiberi'ssocialsecuritynumber,even
iflegal
andpermissibleasDefendantscontend,DefendantOrlyTaitzshowsbyhersworntestimonyintheform
of
anaffidavit(ExhibitA)thatfromthedate
of
hearingshedidnotpublishorrepublishMs.Liberi'sfullsocialsecuritynumber.
DefendantsDr.OrlyTaitz'
and
DefendourFreedomsFoundations'Objections
1
to
OrdersInDocuments
81-82,
Objections
and
ResponsetoApplication
for
TROinDocument
83,
andMotion
for
Summary
and
FinalDismissalwithprejudice
of
TROor
EmergencyMotion
for
Continuance
of
August
7,
2009,hearinguntilafter
August
23,2009.
 
DefendantTaitzfurtherinformstheCourtunderoaththatalthoughasocialsecuritynumberhadonceerroneouslypublishedbeforethehearing(beforethecasewasfiled),thepublishednumberwasnotevenLiberi'struesocialsecuritynumber,makingthePlaintiffs'entireApplicationforTROandPreliminaryInjunctioncompletelyfrivolous.ByLisaLiberi'sownadmissionintheTRO,coupledwithadeclarationshesignedpreviously,whensheresidedinCalifornia,LisaLiberiisusingatleasttwosocialsecuritynumbers,whichwouldappeartoconstitute(1)aviolation
of
42
U.S.c.
§408(a)(7)(B),fraudontheSocialSecurityadministration,IRSandaplainanddirectviolation
of
theconditions
of
herprobationconditions.Accordingly,DefendantsaskthishonorablecourttoforwardthisinformationtotheSocialSecurityadministration,IRSandtheprobationdepartment
of
SanBernardinoCalifornia,whereLisaLiberiwasconvictedlastyear,in2008
of
10
felonies
of
forgeryandgrandtheftandtotheProbationdepartment
of
santaFeNewMexicowheresheresidescurrently.
It
remainsDefendants'firmandunwaiveringcontentionthattheyhaveneverusedorcited
any
previously
unpublishedinformation
nor
any
identifying
data
not
previously
made
public
at
publicproceedingsincluding
criminal
trials.
Whereforeandaccordingly,DefendantsOrlyTaitzandDefendourFreedomsFoundationobjecttothecourt'spairedorderscontainedinDocuments81-82thatthepredicates
of
personaljurisdiction,subjectmatterjurisdiction,andeventheexistence
of
cognizablecauses
of
actionremainunaddressedbythePlaintiffs.DespitetheCourt'sordertoshowcauseenteredJune26,2009,thePlaintiffsarenowbeingallowedto
DefendantsDr.OrlyTaitz'
and
DefendourFreedomsFoundations'Objections2toOrders
In
Documents
81-82,
Objections
and
ResponsetoApplication
for
TROinDocument
83,
andMotion
for
Summary
and
FinalDismissalwithprejudice
of
TROorEmergency
Motion/or
Continuance
0/
August
7,
2009,
hearinguntilafter
August
23,2009.
 
continuetheirpatentlyfrivolous,entirelygroundlesslitigationinthefaceandonthetrail
of
theirrepeatedfailurestosatisfythecourt'scuriosity,aswellastheDefendants'whatthejurisdictionalandsubstantivebasisforthislawsuitreallyis.DefendantsOrlyTaitzandDefendourFreedomsFoundationfranklyhavemoreimportantworktodo,andtheBerg-Liberi-Adams-Ostellacampaign
of
paperterrorismshouldbeshutdownonceandforall,whereforeDefendantsOrlyTaitzandDefendourFreedomsFoundationrespectfullyrequestthattheorderscontainedindocuments81-82bereconsideredandsetaside,inlight
of
thePlaintiffs'continuingabjectfailuretoarticulatelegallycognizableclaimsoverwhichthiscourthasjurisdictionagainsttheseparticulardefendants.Attheclose
of
thelast(andfirstandonly)hearinginthiscase,thiscourtinstructed
plaintiffs
attorneyBergtoexplainandjustifyhisassertionthatthiscourtshouldexercisepersonaljurisdictionovertheDefendantsTaitzandDefendOurFreedomsFoundation.OntherecordBergmisrepresentedcertainsignificantmaterialfactstothecourtbystating,forexample,thatTaitzhadsuedSenatorSpectorandrepresentedotherclientsinP
A..
Affidavitsareunnecessarytoprovethisfact
if
itweretrue.
If
itweretrue,Bergcouldretrievefromtherelevantstateorfederalcourts,orpropertyrecords,arbitratorsreports,clientstatementsorwhateverothersourcesmightexist.HoweverwhenTaitzprotestedandstatedthatitneverhappened,Bergdidnotretracthisassertion,andthecourtaccordinglyorderedhimtopresentfactsandaffidavitstosubstantiatehisallegations,whichTaitzhadimmediatelydeniedinopencourt.
DefendantsDr.OrlyTaitz'
and
Defend
our
FreedomsFoundations'Objections3toOrders
In
Documents
81-82,
Objections
and
ResponsetoApplication
for
TROinDocument
83,
and
Motion
for
Summaryand
FinalDismissalwithprejudice
of
TROorEmergencyMotion
for
Continuance
of
August
7,
2009,hearinguntilafter
August
23,2009.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->