In November 2005, the National Committee on US-China Relations and China Institutes for Contemporary International Relations co-hosted a foreign aid policy workshop in Beijing, marking the first time the US and China met specifically to discuss foreign aid. Michael Glosny explores the similarities and differences between American and Chinese foreign aid policies, the particular challenges each country faces in its respective capacity as a donor country, and the potential for future cooperation between the China and the US as each country increases its commitment to providing aid.
Glosny describes how China has become more involved in the international donor community and has recently begun engaging more deeply in multilateral organizations. He notes China’s history of using aid primarily to encourage diplomatic recognition for the PRC or promote its political ideology, although the importance of these goals has lessened during during China’s market reform era (gaige kaifang), when China focused more on domestic economic development. One current viewpoint is that China’s status as a developing country and its lack of conditionalities when providing aid make it a more popular donor than many Western countries, which often require strict conditions before providing aid.
Glosny also explores the similar national objectives that motivate U.S. and Chinese foreign aid policies, as well as the challenges both face in coordinating foreign aid agencies with government bureaucracies. The report includes recommendations on foreign aid policies for both the United States and China.
In November 2005, the National Committee on US-China Relations and China Institutes for Contemporary International Relations co-hosted a foreign aid policy workshop in Beijing, marking the first time the US and China met specifically to discuss foreign aid. Michael Glosny explores the similarities and differences between American and Chinese foreign aid policies, the particular challenges each country faces in its respective capacity as a donor country, and the potential for future cooperation between the China and the US as each country increases its commitment to providing aid.
Glosny describes how China has become more involved in the international donor community and has recently begun engaging more deeply in multilateral organizations. He notes China’s history of using aid primarily to encourage diplomatic recognition for the PRC or promote its political ideology, although the importance of these goals has lessened during during China’s market reform era (gaige kaifang), when China focused more on domestic economic development. One current viewpoint is that China’s status as a developing country and its lack of conditionalities when providing aid make it a more popular donor than many Western countries, which often require strict conditions before providing aid.
Glosny also explores the similar national objectives that motivate U.S. and Chinese foreign aid policies, as well as the challenges both face in coordinating foreign aid agencies with government bureaucracies. The report includes recommendations on foreign aid policies for both the United States and China.
In November 2005, the National Committee on US-China Relations and China Institutes for Contemporary International Relations co-hosted a foreign aid policy workshop in Beijing, marking the first time the US and China met specifically to discuss foreign aid. Michael Glosny explores the similarities and differences between American and Chinese foreign aid policies, the particular challenges each country faces in its respective capacity as a donor country, and the potential for future cooperation between the China and the US as each country increases its commitment to providing aid.
Glosny describes how China has become more involved in the international donor community and has recently begun engaging more deeply in multilateral organizations. He notes China’s history of using aid primarily to encourage diplomatic recognition for the PRC or promote its political ideology, although the importance of these goals has lessened during during China’s market reform era (gaige kaifang), when China focused more on domestic economic development. One current viewpoint is that China’s status as a developing country and its lack of conditionalities when providing aid make it a more popular donor than many Western countries, which often require strict conditions before providing aid.
Glosny also explores the similar national objectives that motivate U.S. and Chinese foreign aid policies, as well as the challenges both face in coordinating foreign aid agencies with government bureaucracies. The report includes recommendations on foreign aid policies for both the United States and China.
Opportunities, Challenges, and Concerns in The Bilateral Relationship Between The United States and China, As Seen by Carla Hills, Chairwoman of The Council On Foreign Relations
National Committee on United States-China Relations
Opportunities, Challenges, and Concerns in The Bilateral Relationship Between The United States and China, As Seen by Carla Hills, Chairwoman of The Council On Foreign Relations
National Committee on United States-China Relations