You are on page 1of 92

Operations Management

Toyota Production System (TPS), Just-in-Time (JIT), and Lean Manufacturing Handout
Dr. Ahmad Syamil, CFPIM, CIRM, CSCP http://www.clt.astate.edu/asyamil/ asyamil AT yahoo DOT com

APICS www.apics.org
Old Name: The American Production and Inventory Control Society New Name: The Association for Operations Management Advancing Productivity, Innovation, and Competitive Success. APICS offers four internationally recognized professional certification programs:
1. CPIM: Certified in Production and Inventory Management 2. CFPIM: Certified Fellow in Production and Inventory Management = CPIM + extensive knowledge sharing with others through presenting, teaching, publishing, and other APICS educational activities. 3. CIRM: Certified in Integrated Resource Management 4. Beginning 2006: Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP) designation is designed for professionals interested in increasing their knowledge of supply chain management, those currently working in the field of supply chain management (SCM), and for those individuals working with enterprise resources planning (ERP) systems.

Why Toyota?

Toyota is now the world's largest carmaker


Toyota sold 2.348 million vehicles in the first three months of 2007.
General Motors (GM) is estimated to have sold 2.26 million cars and small trucks during the same period.

Why Toyota?

Why Toyota?

Why not Toyota?


GM lost $10.6 billion in 2005. GM's pension obligations under funded by about $31 billion GM will eliminate 30,000 jobs and close 12 North American factories by 2008 Ford earned $2 billion worldwide, but lost $1.6 billion in its North American operations. Ford is shutting 10 plants and laying off 25,000 hourly workers. Daimler paid $36 billion for Chrysler in 1998. Chrysler reported a $1.5 billion loss for the third quarter of 2006 and a $2 billion loss for the first quarter of 2007. DaimlerChysler finally sold 80.1% of Chrysler to Cerberus Capital for $7.4 billion in May of 2007.

Why Toyota?

History of Manufacturing Management

Sakichi Toyoda, the founder of the Toyota group of companies, started Toyota as a textile machine company.
Kiichiro Toyoda, son of Sakichi and founder of the Toyota automobile business, developed the concept of Just-in-Time in the 1930s. He decreed that Toyota operations would contain no excess inventory and that Toyota would strive to work in partnership with suppliers to level production. Taiichi Ohno, Toyota's chief of production in the postWWII period. He was THE main developer of Toyota Production System (TPS). Dr. Shigeo Shingo: A consultant to Toyota. PS: Shingo Prize is the highest manufacturing excellence award in the U.S. The prize is given both to companies and individuals who contribute to the development of manufacturing excellence.

History

History (cont.)
Toyota Production System (TPS) drew wide attention from the industrial community because Toyota was a profitable car company in Japan during and after the oil embargo in 1970s. Outside Japan, dissemination began in earnest with the creation of the Toyota-General Motors joint venture-NUMMI (New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.) in California in 1984. Widespread recognition of TPS as the model production system grew rapidly with the publication in 1990 of The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production, the result of five years of research led by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The MIT researchers found that TPS was so much more effective and efficient than traditional, mass production that it represented a completely new paradigm and coined the term lean production to indicate this radically different approach to production. The term was coined by John Krafcik, a research assistant at MIT with the International Motor Vehicle Program in the late 1980s. He then worked for General Motors and now is a Vice President of Hyundai, U.S.

Toyota Production System (TPS)


Definition: The production system developed by Toyota Motor Corporation to provide best quality, lowest cost, and shortest lead time through the elimination of waste. TPS is comprised of two pillars, Just-in-Time and Jidoka (autonomation) , and is often illustrated with the "house" shown on the next slide. TPS is maintained and improved through iterations of standardized work and kaizen (continuous improvement), following PlanDo-Check-Act (PDCA Cycle from Dr. Deming), or the scientific method.

House of Toyota

Toyota Production System (TPS): Related Terms


Ohno System MAN (Material as Needed) - Harley Davidson MIPS (Minimum Inventory Production Systems) - Westinghouse Stockless production - Hewlett Packard Zero inventory production system Lean Manufacturing/Production - MIT

How to make money?


Profit equation: Sales Cost = Profit

Traditional pricing strategy: Cost + Profit = Selling price


Example:

When the cost goes up, the product selling price is raised to reflect the higher costs and maintain the desired level of profit. Some even argues that the profit added should be large enough to cover potential losses if the product does not sell well.
Toyota accepts neither this formula nor these arguments!

Toyotas philosophy
Selling price Cost = Profit Customers decide the selling price. Profit is what remains after subtracting the cost from it. The main way to increase profit is to reduce cost. Consequently, cost reduction through waste elimination should have the highest priority. Toyotas paradox: Reducing cost (waste), will reduce lead time while increasing quality and customer satisfaction. How? We will discuss it soon.

House of Toyota

Attacks waste

What Does Just-in-Time Do?


From the customers perspective

Anything not adding value to the product

Exposes problems and bottlenecks caused by variability


Deviation from optimum

Achieves streamlined production


By reducing inventory

Introductory Quotation
Waste (muda in Japanese) is anything other than the minimum amount of equipment, materials, parts, space, and workers time, which are absolutely essential to add value to the product.
Shoichiro Toyoda Founder, Toyota
1995 Corel Corp.

Variability Occurs Because


Employees, machines, and suppliers produce units that do not conform to standards, are late, or are not the proper quantity Engineering drawings or specifications are inaccurate Production personnel try to produce before drawings or specifications are complete Customer demands are unknown

Continuous Flow
Producing and moving one item at a time (or a small and consistent batch of items) through a series of processing steps as continuously as possible, with each step making just what is requested by the next step.
It is also called the one-piece flow, single-piece flow, and make one, move one.

Continuous Flow Production


Traditional Flow
Production Process (stream of water) Customers

Suppliers

Flow with JIT


Suppliers

Inventory (stagnant ponds)

Material (water in stream) Customers

Push versus Pull


Push system: material is pushed into downstream workstations regardless of whether resources are available
Pull system: material is pulled to a workstation just as it is needed

Traditional U.S. Manufacturing Firm: Push (old style MRP / Material Requirements Planning System) The production of items at times required by a given schedule planned in advance

Work Station 1

WS 2

WS 3

Material Information (Production Schedule)

Pull (JIT) System


The production of items only as demanded for use or to replace those taken for use.

Work Station 1

WS 2

WS 3

Material Information (via Kanban/Card)

Kanban
Japanese word for card
Pronounced kahn-bahn (not can-ban)

Authorizes production from downstream operations


Pulls material through plant

May be a card, flag, verbal signal etc. Used often with fixed-size containers
Add or remove containers to change production rate

Triangular Kanban
Part # Part Description Location

Date Triggered

Lot Size

Trigger (Reorder) Point

Tool #

Machine #

Kanban

Figure S12.5

Basic Fixed-Order Quantity Model and Reorder Point Behavior


1. You receive an order quantity Q. 4. The cycle then repeats.

Number of units on hand

Q R

2. Your start using them up over time.

L
Time

R = Reorder point Q = Economic order quantity L = Lead time

L 3. When you reach down to a level of inventory of R, you place your next Q sized order.

Kanban
The function of Kanban
The function of Inventory Reorder Point (ROP)

Kanban System
Single card Move only containers with C (Conveyance)kanban) e.g.: Kawasaki Dual card Move only container with C- kanban Produce only when authorized by P (Production)- kanban e.g.: Toyota

Transparency 17.5

Inventory
Traditional: inventory exists in case problems arise JIT objective: Eliminate inventory JIT requires
Small lot sizes Low setup time Containers for fixed number of parts

JIT inventory: Minimum inventory to keep system running

Heijunka = Leveling (Smoothing) Production Schedule using Mixed Model Sequencing


Reduce ripple effect of small variations in schedules (e.g., final assembly) Production quantities evenly distributed over time (e.g., 7/day) Build same mix of products every day
Results in many small lots 1 month = 20 working days Item Monthly Quantity A 40

Daily Quantity 2

Small versus Large Lots JIT produces same amount


JIT Small Lots
A A B B B C A
in same time if setup times are lowered A

Time
Small lots also increase flexibility to meet customer demands

Large-Lot Approach
A A A A B B B

Time

Photo S12.4

Heijunka = Leveling (Smoothing) Production Schedule using Mixed Model Sequencing = Uniform Plant Loading

Determining Production Sequence


Product A B Monthly Demand

800 20 40 800 20 40

Daily Requirements

200 20 10 C Largest integer that divides into all daily requirements evenly is 10 Product Daily Requirements Divided by 10 A 4010 4
B C Mixed-model sequence A-B-A-B-A-B-A-B-C
Transparency 17.7

4010 4 1010 1
Repeat 10 times per day

Cycle Times
Working time per day = 480 minutes Daily requirements: A = 40 units; B = 40 units; C = 10 units The system cycle time = 480/(40+40+10) = 5.33 min/unit Product
A
B C

Requirements
40
40 10

480 4012 480 4012 48010 48

Cycle Time

Transparency 17.8

Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste

Work in process inventory level (hides problems)

Unreliable Vendors

Scrap

Capacity Imbalances

Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste


Reducing inventory reveals problems so they can be solved.

Unreliable Vendors

Scrap

WIP Capacity Imbalances

Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste


Reducing inventory reveals problems so they can be solved.

Unreliable Vendors

Scrap

WIP Capacity Imbalances

Customer orders 10

Reducing Lot Sizes Increases the Number of Lots


Lot size = 5 Lot 2 Lot 1

Lot size = 2 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5

Which Increases Inventory Costs


Cost

Setup Cost
Smaller Optimal Lot Size Lot Size

Lot Size

Unless Setup Costs are Reduced


Cost

Setup Cost
optimal New optimal lotOriginal size lot size

Lot Size

Quick setup = Quick changeover


Reducing setup cost reducing setup time Setup reduction time is a prerequisite to lot size reduction SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Dies) method The method has been developed by Toyota and then expanded by Dr. Shigeo Shingo (a consultant to Toyota), and has proven its effectiveness in many companies by reducing changeover times (non-value added times) from hours to a less than 10 minutes

Setup Components
Internal Setup: consists of setup activities that must be performed while the machine is stopped. External Setup: consists of setup activities that can be carried out while the machine is still operating. It is desirable to: 1. Convert as much internal setup to external setup 2. Improve the setup procedure

Systematic Setup Reduction

Setup Reduction

Setup Reduction:
Standardizing die holder heights reduces the need to exchange fastening bolts

Setup Reduction Techniques

Quality At The Source


Doing it right at the first time. Jidoka allows workers to stop production line Andon lights signal quality problems Under capacity scheduling allows for planning, problem solving & maintenance Visual control makes problems visible Poka-yoke prevents defects

House of Toyota

Jidoka
Toyota Production System (TPS) is supported by two pillars: Just-inTime and Jidoka Jidoka = Autonomation = Automation with human intelligence. Sakichi Toyoda, founder of the Toyota group of companies, invented the concept of Jidoka in the early 20th Century by incorporating a device on his automatic looms that would stop the loom from operating whenever a thread broke. Dr. Shigeo Shingo then developed his idea further. This enabled great improvements in quality and freed people up to do more value creating work than simply monitoring machines for quality (separating peoples work and machines work). Eventually, this simple concept found its way into every machine, every production line, and every Toyota operation.

Jidoka Techniques
Poka-yoke (mistake or error proofing) A form of device for building-in quality at each production process. This device may take many shapes and designs. Typical types of Pokayoke are sensors, proximity switches, stencils, light guards and alignment pins. Simple circuitry is usually used to operate these electrical error proof devices as they should be of low cost and simple design. Goal: Finding defects before they occur = Zero Defects Statistical Quality Control (SQC): Finding defects after they occur Visual management including using Andon Lamp

Exhibit 7.10

Poka-Yoke Example

Visual Management Andon Lamp


Red - line stoppage Yellow - call for help Green - normal operation

Kaizen
Change for better = continuous improvement Kaizen workshop or Kaizen event: A group of Kaizen activity, commonly lasting five days, in which a team identifies and implements a significant improvement in a process, e.g., creating a manufacturing cell.

GEMBA
GEMBA" is a Japanese word meaning "real place", where the real action takes place. In business, GEMBA is where the value-adding activities to satisfy the client are carried out. Manufacturing companies have three main activities in relation to creating money: developing (designing), producing and selling products. In a broad sense, GEMBA means the sites of these three major activities. In a narrower context, however, GEMBA means the place where the products are made. The term is often used to stress the that real improvement can only take place when there is a shop-floor focus on direct observation of current conditions where work is done, e.g., not only in the engineering office.

Five Golden Rules of Gemba


Masaaki Imai promoted Kaizen to people outside Japan through his two highly acclaimed books: 1. Kaizen: The Key To Japan's Competitive Success. 2. Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense, Low-Cost Approach to Management He preaches the Five Golden Rules of Gemba, the first of which is 'When a problem (abnormality) arises, go to gemba first'. So what's gemba? It's the shop floor, or equivalent. Once there, you apply Golden Rule Two: check with gembutsu (relevant objects). Three: take temporary counter-measures on the spot. Four: find the root cause.

Five: standardize to prevent recurrence.


Standardization is the managing part of getting good gemba. You also need good housekeeping (Imai is very keen on cleaning machines) and muda, the elimination of waste. But all hinges on getting away from your desk. Obey the master Imai. GO TO GEMBA!

5Whys: Finding the root cause of a problem.

5 Whys analysis as an effective problem-solving technique. It is also used in Six Sigma. Example:
Why is our client, Hinson Corp., unhappy? Because we did not deliver our services when we said we would.

Why were we unable to meet the agreed-upon timeline or schedule for delivery? The job took much longer than we thought it would.
Why did it take so much longer? Because we underestimated the complexity of the job. Why did we underestimate the complexity of the job? Because we made a quick estimate of the time needed to complete it, and did not list the individual stages needed to complete the project. Why didn't we do this? Because we were running behind on other projects. We clearly need to review our time estimation and specification procedures.

Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA/Shewart /Deming Cycle)


Plan: Go to the real place/factory flow (gemba), obverse the real thing/product (gembutsu), get the real fact (genjitsu). Focus on reducing response time, lead times, exposing wastes in your process Do: Conduct Kaizen. Create models of excellence so others can aspire to. Flow everything: product, information material replenishment, services. Check for direction by aligning activities with long-term business direction Act: Take actions to sustain and accelerate improvement activities
Source: www.leanbreakthru.com

Similarity between 3 Gs and MBWA


The 3 G's (Gemba, Gembutsu, and Genjitsu, which translate into actual place, actual thing, and actual situation). In the early days of Hewlett-Packard (H-P), Dave Packard and Bill Hewlett devised an active management style that they called Management By Walking Around (MBWA). Senior H-P managers were seldom at their desks. They spent most of their days visiting employees, customers, and suppliers. This direct contact with key people provided them with a solid grounding from which viable strategies could be crafted.

5S: Workplace organization/Housekeeping


5s: Important part of Kaizen/Lean Manufacturing The S's stand for: Seiri - keep only what is absolutely necessary, get rid of things that you don't need, i.e. simplify or sort. Seiton - create a location for everything, i.e. organize or straighten. Seiso - clean everything and keep it clean, i.e. cleanliness or sweep. Seiketsu - implement Seiri, Seiton and Seiso plant wide, i.e. standardize. Shitsuke - assure that everyone continues to follow the rules of 5S, i.e. stick to it or self discipline.

5S in the US: Sort, Straighten, Sweep, Standardize, Self Disciple 5S + 1S (Safety) = 6S (Hytrol, etc) 5S + 2S (Safety and Security) = 7 S (Agilent Technology that was part of Hewlett Packard)

5S
5S is simple to begin and gives good benefits. Each individual in an organization is asked to get rid of overburdening items.

Red tag attack: A red tag attack is the strategy of a group of people going through the plant and putting red tags on everything that has not been used within the last 30 days. The items that people feel are necessary to "hold on to" must be justified to their superior, or the item is taken out of the plant!

5S in a Factory

Factory tour: Toyota vs. others.

5S in Office
Before 5 S

After 5 S

Standard Work
When manpower, equipment, and materials are used in the most efficient combination, this is called Standard Work. There are three elements to Standard Work:

1) Takt Time
2) Work Sequence 3) Standard Work-in-Process

Once a Standard Work is set, performance is measured and continuously improved.

Standard Work Sheet


Scope of Operations From To Raw m at er i al Heat Tr eat m ent Date Reviewed:
Janary 7, 2000

FG

RM

Quality Check

Safety Precaution

Standard Work in Process

Standard WIP Quantity


10

TAKT Time
12.1 min

Cycle Time
23.4 min 2

Crew Size

The Importance of Standardized Work:


Without it, all improvement efforts using Kaizen to eliminate waste (muda) are not sustainable. You will go back to the original position before Kaizen.

Manufacturing Cell

Worker Routes Lengthened as Volume Decreases


Cell 1 Cell 2

Worker 1

Worker 2

Worker 3

Cell 3 Figure 11.4

Cell 4

Cell 5

Workload balancing
Aims at maximizing operator utilization based on the given takt time. Is the key to adjust JIT lines to demand fluctuations Requires flexible operators

Production Line Balancing

Improving Lead Time:


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Current Situation Percent of Lead Time
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

20

VA

NVA (Non Value Added)

Approach # 1: Reducing Value Added (VA) Time by 50%

VA

NVA

Approach # 2: Reducing Non Value Added (VA) Time by 50%

VA

NVA

Value Stream Mapping


What? Why? Who? When?

SM

A visual tool for identifying all activities of the planning, and manufacturing process to identify waste. Provides a tool to visualize what is otherwise usually invisible. The leaders of each product family need to have a primary role in developing the maps for their own area. Develop a current-state map before improvements are made so that the efforts and benefits can be quantified.

Where?
How?

On the shop floor, not from your office. You need the real information, not opinion or old data.
Next page

Value Stream Map Symbols


Spot weld ABC plating Process Vendor
3,000 units C/T = 30 sec C/O = 10 min 3 shifts 2% scrap rate = 1 day

Finished goods

Data box

Inventory

C/T = Cycle Time C/O = Change over or setup time


Mon and Wed

Push

Physical pull Supermarket: the location of a predetermined standard inventory

Shipment

Current Value Stream Map

Future Value Stream Map

Attributes of Lean Producers - they


use JIT to eliminate inventory build systems to help employees product a perfect part every time reduce space requirements develop close relationships with suppliers educate suppliers eliminate all but value-added activities develop the workforce make jobs more challenging reduce the number of job classes and build worker flexibility apply Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)

The Five Steps of Lean Production/Toyota Production System Implementation

Step 1: Specify Value Define value from the perspective of the final customer. Express value in terms of a specific product, which meets the customer's needs at a specific price and at a specific time. Step 2: Value Stream Mapping. Identify the value stream, the set of all specific actions required to bring a specific product through the three critical management tasks of any business: the problemsolving task, the information management task, and the physical transformation task. Create a map of the Current State and the Future State of the value stream. Identify and categorize waste in the Current State, and eliminate it! Step 3: Create Continuous Flow Make the remaining steps in the value stream flow. Eliminate functional barriers and develop a product-focused organization that dramatically improves lead-time. Step 4: Create Pull Production Let the customer pull products as needed. Step 5: Perfection There is no end to the process of reducing effort, time, space, cost, and mistakes. Return to the first step and begin the next lean transformation, offering a product which is ever more nearly what the customer wants.

Comparison of MRP (Material Requirements Planning), JIT, and TOC (Theory of Constraints)
MRP
Loading of operations Checked by capacity requirements Planning afterward One week or more

JIT
Controlled by kanban system Small as possible

TOC
Controlled by bottleneck operation Variable to exploit constraint Critical for bottleneck and feeder operations Fast Moderate Moderate Meet demand Maximize profits Bottleneck Need and plan

Batch sizes

Importance of data accuracy Speed of scheduled development Flexibility Cost Goals Planning focus Production basis

Critical Slow Lowest Highest Meet demand Have doable plan Master schedule Plan

Unnecessary Very fast Highest Lowest Meet demand Eliminate waste Final assembly schedule Need

You might also like