Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Supercritical is the technology of choice, among coal options Key technological and market developments Supercritical for anthracite Conclusions
CFB
Source: ALSTOM
Supercritical
2003 2004 2005 2006
Sub critical
CFB
Source: ALSTOM
Supercritical
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Subcritical
<22.1 MPa/538oC/538oC
35.0-38.0
Supercritical (SC)
24.7 MPa/538-565oC/565oC
38.0-40.0
Ultra-supercritical (USC)
27 MPa/565-625oC
40.0-42.5
Advanced USC
27 MPa/above 625oC
42.5-46.0
More than 200 SC and USC units have been ordered to start operating in the next 23 years
Why supercritical? Higher efficiency means lower fuel costs and CO2 emissions
ECO-Asia CLEAN DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE PROGRAM Higher efficiency should be sought whether CCS is required or not
65 With CO2 capture 60
55
40
35 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
capture, % (HHV)
ECO-Asia CLEAN DEVELOPMENT AND CLIMATE PROGRAM Availability of supercritical is similar to subcritical
Difficult fuel to burn Most boilers downshot firing ("W-Flame) T-fired (4X300 MW) in China Arch-fired (2X660 MW) in China
12
Anthracite-fired pulverized power plants Worldwide capacity (operating and planned): 54.4 GWs
China: 43 GWs (low volatile and anthracite) Spain: 3.0 GWs (incl. 7X300MW) United Kingdom: 1.9 GWs (incl 3X500MW) Vietnam: ~1.9 GWs Germany: 1.1 GW (largest plant: 750MW)
13
Supercritical Anthracite-fired pulverized power plants China (burning 100% anthracite or blend)
Datang Xiangtan: 2X600MW burning 50%/50% blend Fengcheng 5&6: 2X600MW T-fired burning blend Huangdao 5&6: 2X660MW T-fired since 2006/07 Huaneng Ruijin 1&2: 2X350MW planned for 2008/09
15
16
Conclusions
Supercritical the technology of choice (among coal options) because of economic and environmental considerations
Anthracite Options
The Past: W-fired subcritical plants The Future: Supercritical Arch-fired and CFB plants
17
Thank you!