Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Political Parties In Europe Represent Socialism Not The Revolutionary Concept of American Republicanism

Political Parties In Europe Represent Socialism Not The Revolutionary Concept of American Republicanism

Ratings: (0)|Views: 33|Likes:
Published by Acharne Dokument
To Germany's Left political Party was Communist, a parliamentarian authoritarian ruling class of elites that controlled the collective, socialist working class of wealth distributed (the commoners lived in distributed poverty, yet those in power held the wealth). Soviet Union (USSR) stands for "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics". The Right defeated the Left Party in Germany when Hitler eliminated parliamentarian rule through thuggery tactics, (assassinations), used by his hit men called "The Brown Shirts".
To Germany's Left political Party was Communist, a parliamentarian authoritarian ruling class of elites that controlled the collective, socialist working class of wealth distributed (the commoners lived in distributed poverty, yet those in power held the wealth). Soviet Union (USSR) stands for "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics". The Right defeated the Left Party in Germany when Hitler eliminated parliamentarian rule through thuggery tactics, (assassinations), used by his hit men called "The Brown Shirts".

More info:

Published by: Acharne Dokument on Nov 12, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Political Parties In Europe Represent Socialism Not The Revolutionary Concept of American Republicanism
In the 1920's the political Right and Left in Europe were opposite to America's concept of Liberty and small government. The 1920's, both European ideologies of the Right and Left required large authoritarian governments to implement their own version of social engineering. Unlike the American Right of small government and conservative Liberties (less power in government more power to the individual due to the emancipation from authoritarianism by the British), and to her Left; large social welfare state governing ideologies similar to that of old world Europe (government expansion in regulatory power and less individual freedoms). In the 1930's, Germanys Right wing ideology was in the form of Fascism that required a dictator, totalitarian type of rule that included a large socialist collectivism economy (NAZI stands for  Socialist Working Party). To Germany's Left political Party was Communist, a  parliamentarian authoritarian ruling class of elites that controlled the collective, socialist working class of wealth distributed (the commoners lived in distributed poverty, yet those in power held the wealth). Soviet Union (USSR) stands for "Union of Soviet Socialist Republics". The Right defeated the Left Party in Germany when Hitler eliminated parliamentarian rule through thuggery tactics, (assassinations), used by his hit men called "The Brown Shirts". Many confuse history to link the European political Right to the American political Right that in reality are total opposites in ideology and economics. In the 1930's, Russia too had a strong Left  political party, communism, that the Nazi's hated, for fascism motivated nationalism on the  premise of world domination and communism is more collective based and authoritarian rule. Through fascism; aggression, war, hatred, and murder motivated the population by production, innovation and technology advances that in turn expanded the economy and empowered the war machine. Russian revolutionaries defeated its Czar rulers by butchery and the murder of millions
 
so to implement and force Communism. Either way, the European Right and Left at that time were socialist economies for government to control the individual so to further abuse their power over the populace. Those who had power also had the wealth; those who lived under these
authoritarian constructs lived sheer “distributed” poverty and fear death or imprisonment if they
fail to honor their governing class as gods then as equals. When actually following the U.S. Constitution, the governing is not above the law (exempt from law), equal to their constituents and a servant to the electorate demands. The U.S. Constitution doctrine opposes socialism,
communism or “social justice Progressivism”; hers is Liberty that is considered a positive
Liberty, not negative, in eyes of those who honor American Freedoms. (1)
Democracy Does Not Equal Plato’s Republicanism
We all heard a U.S. president and other big government supporters encourage Egypt's riots so to over throw a dictator so to promote "democracy". Most Americans today are uneducated in understanding the difference between a Republic and Democracy due to the fact that complete American history is no longer taught in public schools. It is amazing today how many adult Americans really do not understand their own system of government. Pure Democracy is a straight line mass populace vote that is neither fair nor just. Pure Democracy, like a presidential election, is at times compared to three foxes and two lambs deciding what to have for dinner (regardless of a electoral college). Obviously in a straight line vote, the foxes would have lamb for dinner since they are the majority. Pure Democracy excludes race, gender, age, religious equality and all minorities. On top of minority exclusions, add lies, deceit, political religion, and hidden intents of public office to those who run, the informed vote becomes the indoctrinated  ballot box forcing a dictatorship. In a true Republic, the whole population controls their government. Morsi ran on misinformation as a centrist to sway votes (a pure democracy) only to rule as a religious dictator out to suppress minorities under retribution, murder and assassination. This is democracy alright, but not a constituted Republic, not Just, Fair or Free. Equate this to the metaphor of the foxes and lambs to where the fox's wore sheep's clothing to deceive the lambs so to attain power; or a free dinner (not true representation). A system of government that represents all minority demographics includes local representatives,  judicial system supporting civil rights and states mandated restrictions to control power of a central construct (U.S. Constitution). In a true Democratic Republic, ALL demographics control their government not only by a majority vote. A presidential vote only elects one individual to run an executive branch, as to that of three branches of government of equal power. This administrative branch does not have power to eliminate constituted restriction; only 2/3 majority  by the states have that power. The House or Representatives support all districts that are minorities compared to large cities, political religions, and authoritarian political Parties. The Judicial branch protects the minorities from majority suppression. Only in conjunction of all three branches and the restrictions in place by the states governments, is there a true Democratic Republic to where the people completely control their government. If Americans ever hear a U.S. president override, talk down to or impose suppressive execute orders to bypass the House or Representatives, Judicial or constituted restrictions, is above the law (exemptions), America will become a dictatorship. The majority will become the government, the ones who claim they will decide on the "individual's behalf". (1) At this point the "lamb" (the populace) will become dinner for the "fox" (government). Congress is only broken if the constituents are no longer
 
represented. If a president declares congress broken by not passing all of his laws thinking that a national election granted him ultimate power over constituted previsions, this is treason. For anyone to simply say that Mohamed Morsi is legitimate through democracy would have to say the same for Hitler. Hitler too was elected by 98% of a pure democratic vote, yet Hitler was the "fox" hiding a hidden socialist agenda; the eventually of this misconception removed  parliamentary and constituted representation to assimilate ultimate power by the blood of millions. The Party to claim they care about the underdog is the fox that will devour them.
Back in 2009, the “Tea Party” movement
 formed on the bases of the Boston Tea Party protest  because colonist were over taxed and controlled by Britain 1000 miles over seas. The Boston Tea Party promoted the Declaration of Independence for individual freedom, limited government, not a socialist, Britain government we fought against. Through the Obama Administration controlled  by the Progressive caucus, now we have share the wealth taxation and regulation, NSA spying on everyone, acceptable murder of women and children by drones and government healthcare that a president so arrogantly named after himself ....... now the whole damn country is looking for work, no one now has affordable healthcare, 17 trillion in debt, and an ideology pleading with Britain to take her colony back. If Progressivism were not in the White House, America could still sing her Star Spangled Banner anthem in public without a court order; for we now offend the socialist and a presidency
if we use words such as “Liberty” or “Patriot”.
 
Those who are against the “Tea Party” are progressives and socialist
 because capitalism and liberty are the polar opposite to
the “Pragmatic progressives”
 (share the wealth) ideology. Barack Obama represents the opposition against the 1776 America where hundreds of thousands of Americans fought and died against a U.S. president
’s ideology
. (2)
.
Barack Obama’s Concept Of America
(Progressivism) (2)
-
 President Obama
 The constitution is flawed because it restricts the government and grants liberty to individuals. To Obama the constitution should restrict the people and grant
liberty to government “what government MUST do on your behalf”.
 2001 Obama WBEZ Interview -
 President Obama
 
“It's gonna be good for everybody ... I think when you spread the wealth around, it's
good for everybody -
 President Obama
 "Do we go forward towards a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared(socialism)? Or do we go backward to the same policies that got us in the mess in the first place (capitalism)" 2012 -
 President Obama
 
“It’s been tried in our history (capitalism) and it hasn’t worked, It didn’t work when we tried it in the decade before the Great Depression. It didn’t work when we tried it in the last decade. We just tried this. What they’re peddling has been tried —it did not work!” Fundraiser at the University
of Vermont -
 President Obama
, an admitted
Progressive
, defines government: “Someone (government) helped us create the unbelievable American system that (we) "government” allowed you to thrive, someone
(government) invested in roads and bridges. If you have a business, you did not build that

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->