• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
 
Case studyMerowe / Hamdab Dam Project
ByAmgad Moussa Falko BethmannSeminarThe Science and Politics of Large Dam ProjectsProfessorsThomas Bernauer, Center for Comparative and International Studies, ETHBernhard Wehrli, Department of Surface Waters - Research and Management,EAWAGAlfred Wüest, Department of Surface Waters - Research and Management, EAWAGDepartment of Applied Aquatic Ecology, EAWAG
SubmittedJuly 16
th
, 2007
 
 
We need large Dams and we are not going to apologize for it.Those in the developed countries who already have everything put stumbling blocks in our way from the comfort of their electrically lit and air conditioned homes…. The third world is not ready to give up the construction of large dams, as much for water supply and flood control as for power…Hydropower is the cheapest and cleanest source of energy, but environmentalists do not appreciate that. Certainly large dam projects create local resettlement problems, but this should be a matter of local, not international concern.” 
Former president Theo van Robbroek of the InternationalCommission on Large Dams ICOLD
To persuade Third World governments to abandon plans to build water development schemes, to which they are often totally committed, is very difficult. Nevertheless, every effort must be made by local environmental groups to do so. If necessary they should resort to non-violent direct actions at the dam site. We in the west can best prevent the construction of further dams by systematically lobbying donor governments, development banks and international agencies, without whose financial help such scheme could not be built. Indeed we call on those organizations herewith to cut off funds from all large-scale water development schemes.” 
 Edward Goldsmith and Nicholas Hildyard, editors of The Ecologist.Source: “Dams and development: transnational struggles for water and power”.Sanjeev Khagram, 2004, Ithaca, Cornell University Press[2].
2
 
Table of contents:
Introducing statements 2Preface 4A The project
A.1 Introduction to Merowe dam 5A.2 Merowe Dam- technical details 5A.3 Geography, Geology and Geophysics 6A.4 Hydrology 6A.5 Socioeconomic context 8A.6 Political context 8
B The challenges
B.1 International relations 10B.2 Resettlement 12B.3 Environmental impact 14B.3.1 Ecology 15B.3.2 Water loss 15B.3.3 Downstream effects 15B.3.4 Greenhouse gas emissions 16B.3.5 Increased salt content and sedimentation 16B.4 Health 16B.5 Archaeological heritage 17
C Evaluation of performance
C.1 PER analysis 19C.1.1 Introduction 19C.1.2 PER scores 19C.1.2.1 Hydropower production 19C.1.2.2 International tensions and relations 20C.1.2.3 Resident people and cultural heritage 21C.1.2.4 Environmental Consequences 22C.1.3 Summary of PER analysis 23C.2 The 1959 agreement as a framework tomanage Merowe-dam-related international conflicts. 24C.3 Assessment of Merowe dam as an electricity production option 24C.3.1 Weighted score assessment of electricity production alternatives 25C.3.1.1 Alternatives 26C.3.1.1.1 Thermal power plant 26C.3.1.1.2 Distributed photovoltaic panels 26C.3.1.1.3 Wind farms 27C.3.1.1.4 Solar-thermal power plant 27C.3.1.2 Assessment criteria 28C.3.1.3 Results of Weighed score assessment for the most promising alternatives 28C.3.2 Economic assessment of the dam 29C.3.2.1 Cash flow and Net Present Worth (NPW) 29C.3.2.2 Merowe dam from sustainability perspective 30C.3.2.2.1 Weak sustainability and external cost 31
D Conclusion 33E Epilogue 35References 36
3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...