• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Liberal Feminism
 First published Thu Oct 18, 2007 
Liberals hold that freedom is a fundamental value, and that the just state ensures freedom for citizens. Liberal feminists share this view, and insist on freedom for women. There isdisagreement among liberals about what freedom means, and thus liberal feminism takes morethan one form. This entry discusses 1) classical liberal or libertarian feminism and 2) egalitarianliberal feminism.
Classical liberal or libertarian feminism
conceives of freedom as freedom from coerciveinterference. It holds that women, as well as men, have a right to such freedom due to their statusas self-owners. It holds that coercive state power is justified only to the extent necessary to protect the right to freedom from coercive interference.
 Equity feminists
are classical liberal or libertarian feminists who hold that, in societies like the United States, the only morallysignificant source of oppression of women is the state. They hold that feminism's political role isto bring an end to laws that limit women's liberty in particular, but also to laws that grant special privileges to women. Some equity feminists see a nonpolitical role for feminism, helping womento benefit from their freedom by developing beneficial character traits or strategies for success,or navigating among their increasing options. Other equity feminists are socially conservativeand argue that, while the state should not enforce them, traditional values function as bulwarksagainst state power and produce independent and self-restraining citizens.
Cultural libertarian feminists
are classical liberal or libertarian feminists who hold that the culture of societies likethe United States is patriarchal and a significant source of oppression of women. They hold thatthe patriarchal culture and the state are complementary systems of oppression. Culturallibertarian feminists hold that much of the oppression women suffer today is noncoercive,however, and thus should not be met with state remedies but with a nonviolent movement for feminist social change. Readers interested in classical liberal or libertarian feminism may want toskip ahead to that section now.
 Egalitarian liberal feminism
conceives of freedom as personal autonomy — living a life of one'sown choosing — and political autonomy — being co-author of the conditions under which onelives. Egalitarian liberal feminists hold that the exercise of personal autonomy depends on certainenabling conditions that are insufficiently present in women's lives, or that social arrangementsoften fail to respect women's personal autonomy and other elements of women's flourishing.They hold also that women's needs and interests are insufficiently reflected in the basicconditions under which they live, and that those conditions lack legitimacy because women areinadequately represented in the processes of democratic self-determination. Egalitarian liberalfeminists hold that autonomy deficits like these are due to the “gender system” (Okin 1989, 89),or the patriarchal nature of inherited traditions and institutions, and that the women's movementshould work to identify and remedy them. As the protection and promotion of citizens' autonomyis the appropriate role of the state on the egalitarian liberal view, egalitarian liberal feminists holdthat the state can and should be the women's movement's ally in protecting and promotingwomen's autonomy. There is disagreement among egalitarian liberal feminists, however, aboutthe role of personal autonomy in the good life, the appropriate role of the state, and howegalitarian liberal feminism is to be justified. Readers interested in egalitarian liberal feminismmay want to skip ahead to that section now.
 
]
) holds thatwomen and men are self-owners capable of acquiring property rights over things. As suchwomen and men, equally, have the right to freedom from coercive interference with their personand property. This right to freedom from coercive interference consists in, at least, rights tofreedom of conscience and expression, freedom to control what happens to one's body, freedomof association, freedom to acquire, control and transfer property, freedom of contract, as well asthe right to compensation when rights are violated. The state's role is, exclusively, to protectcitizens from coercive interference by protecting their rights. Some reject even a limited state,however, holding that nongovernmental means of protecting rights are to be preferred.
 
Classical liberal or libertarian feminists hold that the right to freedom from coercive interferencehas powerful implications for women's lives. It implies that women have the right to freedom inintimate, sexual and reproductive matters. This includes sexual autonomy (the right to engage insexual activity of one's choosing including the buying and selling of sex (Almodovar 2002;Lehrman 1997, 23), and the right to defend oneself against sexual aggression, including the useof firearms (Stevens et al. 2002)); freedom of expression (the right to appear in, publish, andconsume pornography free of censorship (McElroy 1995; Strossen 2000)); freedom of intimateassociation (the right to partner or enter into a private marriage contract (McElroy 1991a, 20));and reproductive freedom (the right to use birth control, have an abortion (on the minority of  pro-life libertarians see Tabarrok 2002, 157), and buy and sell bodily reproductive services as insurrogate motherhood (Lehrman 1997, 22; McElroy 2002c; Paul 2002)). Freedom frominterference with person and property also means that women have the right to engage ineconomic activity in a free market, entering contracts, and acquiring, controlling and transferring property free of sexist state limits (Epstein 1992; Kirp, Yudolf, and Franks 1986, 204).One way to characterize the wrong involved when states fail to recognize these rights of womenis as a failure to respect women's right to be treated as men's equal, or the right to equal treatmentunder the law. To be sure, classical liberal feminists hold that the law should not treat women andmen differently. But this is because they believe everyone has the same rights, not because they believe women have a right to be treated the same as men. This is clear when we note that, for classical liberal or libertarian feminism, equal treatment under unjust law is not justice (McElroy1991a, 3).Same treatment under the law does not guarantee same outcomes. Classical liberal or libertarianfeminists hold that women's rights are not violated when citizens exercise their rights in waysthat create unequal outcomes (Epstein 2002, 30). A woman's rights are violated only when she isinterfered with coercively, that is, when there is, or is a threat of, forced loss of freedom, propertyor life (which does not serve as just restraint or compensation).
1.2 Equity Feminism
Equity feminism is a form of classical liberal or libertarian feminism that holds that feminism's
 political 
role is simply to ensure that everyone's, including women's, right against coerciveinterference is respected (Sommers 1994, 22). Wendy McElroy, an equity feminist writes: “I'vealways maintained that the only reason I call myself a feminist is because of [the] gov[ernment].By which I mean, if the government (or an anarchist defense assoc[iation]) acknowledged thefull equal rights of women without paternalistic protection or oppression, I would stop writingabout women's issues” (McElroy 1998c).Feminism's political role involves assuring that women's right against coercive interference by private individuals is recognized and protected by the state (for example women's right againstgroping on the street or rape within marriage (McElroy 1991a)), and that women's right againstcoercive interference by the state itself is respected. The latter means feminists should object tolaws that restrict women's liberty in particular (for example laws that limit women's employmentoptions (Taylor 1992, 228)), and laws that protect women in particular (for example laws thatgrant preferential treatment to women (Paul 1989)). Equity feminists suggest that this has beenlargely accomplished in countries like the United States. Joan Kennedy Taylor explains:feminism's “goal of equal political liberty for women has been pretty much reached in the UnitedStates” (Taylor 2001; see also Sommers 1994, 274).
1.2.1 Equity Feminism on the Oppression of Women
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...