3Internet News Record
Fed payments for holding immigrants vary widely(AP)
(Yahoo! News: U.S. News)
Submitted at 8/10/2009 4:06:12 AM
SAN ANTONIO – As federalofficials begin an overhaul of thewidely criticized system used toincarcerate immigrants awaitinghearings and deportation, theirchallenge includes a deepinconsistency in the amount paid to ahastily assembled network of privateprisons and local jails that holdthousands of such detainees.Contracts obtained by TheAssociated Press illustrate theproblem in paper-heavy detail, andnot all of the discrepancies can beexplained by geography ordifferences in the cost of living. Forexample, a suburban Atlanta countyis paid less than $43 per day to housean illegal immigrant, while a ruralNew Mexico county gets $97 a day just a few dollars shy of the amountpaid for a bed in Los Angeles.Some county jails charge only theactual cost of housing an immigrant,while others acknowledge partneringwith private prison companies toprofit from the system.Last week, the Obamaadministration announced a series of "major reforms" in the detention of illegal immigrants, including placingfederal employees inside the largestfacilities to monitor detaineetreatment. In doing so, John Morton,the new director of Immigration andCustoms Enforcement,acknowledged the current system isboth inconsistent and lacks oversight."There isn't a uniform rhyme orreason to it," he said.Morton pledged to review all theagreements ICE has to detain illegalimmigrants at 350 different facilities,an operation that will cost $1.7billion this year. Most of the facilitieswere designed to hold criminals, butthe immigrants detained by ICE faceonly civil immigration proceedingsand many have never been convictedof any crime. They include familiesand people seeking asylum.Only a tenth of the 33,400 beds inuse are owned by ICE, and many of those beds are guarded by privatecontractors. An additional 16 percentof the beds in the ICE network arecompletely owned and operated byprivate prison companies. Themajority of beds are owned by localand state governments, some of which outsource their jail and prisonoperations to private contractors.The result is that in all but ahandful of cases, the federaldetention of an immigrant involves apayment to an outside company oragency.Many of those contracts werenegotiated over the last decade whenthe government was outsourcing agrowing number of services and ICE,under pressure to detain moreimmigrants who had previously beenallowed to remain free, was rushingto add space."They had to find quick places withbeds," said Peter L. Markowitz,director of the Immigration JusticeClinic at the Benjamin N. CardozoSchool of Law.Through a Freedom of Informationrequest, the AP obtained ICE'scontracts with some of the largestimmigration detention facilities; theagency also recently began postingdozens of other contracts online. Thedaily rate paid for a jail bed varieswidely among 38 government-to-government agreements signed since2006, even within the same regions.For example, Orange County, N.Y.,has a deal to house detainees fornearly $134 per day, compared with$105 per day in Monmouth County,N.J. Separated by 106 miles, thecounties sit about the same distancefrom New York City.The deals ICE signs with localgovernments allow for some profit,said agency spokeswoman ErnestineFobbs. Haskell County, Texas, takesin about $1,000 per month more thanit pays a private contractor to run itsRolling Plains Regional DetentionCenter, and the extra money is usedto boost salaries in the three-mansheriff's department, said the county'stop official, David Davis.But at less than $58 per day,Haskell County receives far less thanthe $97 per immigrant being paid toOtero County, N.M., even thoughboth counties are rural and builtprisons as economic developmentprojects. Davis said he wasn't awarethat other counties were getting paidsubstantially more."I've never compared what we hadwith what they had," he said.Otero County opened itsimmigration detention facility lastyear about 25 miles north of El Paso.Approached by a private contractorlooking to arrange the deal, "thecounty saw a potential to increasesome revenues," said AssistantCounty Manager Ray Backstom.The county makes a "small" profiton every bed that's occupied, saidBackstrom, though he wasn't surehow much. He said he wasn't directlyinvolved in the negotiations betweenICE, the county and Centerville,Utah-based Management andTraining Corp., the private companythat built and runs the facility. ICEpays Otero County about $3 less perimmigrant per day than it pays LosAngeles County.Morton said ICE has long-termplans to find arrangements that aremore suitable than prison-likefacilities. "We're going to focus onbuilding a better mouse trap," hesaid.Immigrant advocates say that couldmean more use of electronicmonitoring, allowing immigrants toremain free while pressing their casesin court. ICE officials have said thatelectronic surveillance programs thatcost about $13 per day have a nearperfect compliance rate, though theycomplain cases generally take longerto resolve when immigrants are free."There are entities that are profitingfrom the use of detention," saidJacqueline Esposito, policycoordinator for Detention WatchNetwork. "There are community-based alternatives and they cost afraction of the price. You have towonder then what the motivation isbehind a detention system that hasexploded."___On the Net:U.S. Immigration and CustomsEnforcement: http://www.ice.gov/
ATI Stream goesfisticuffs with NVIDIA'sCUDA in epic GPGPUtussle
By Darren Murph (Engadget)
Submitted at 8/10/2009 8:57:00 AM
It's a given that the GPGPU(orGeneral-Purpose GraphicsProcessing Unit) has a long, longways to go before it can make a dentin the mainstream market, but giventhat ATI was talking up Streamnearly three whole years ago, we'dsay a battle royale between it and itsbiggest rival was definitely in order.As such, the benchmarking gurusover at PC Perspective saw fit to pitATI's Stream and NVIDIA's CUDAtechnologies against one another in aknock-down-drag-out for the ages,essentially looking to see whichsystem took the most strain awayfrom the CPU during video encodingand which produced more visuallyappealing results. We won't bothergetting into the nitty-gritty (that'swhat the read link is for), but we willsay this: in testing, ATI's contraptionmanaged to relieve the most stressfrom the CPU, though NVIDIA'salternative seemed to pump out thehighest quality materials. In otherwords, you can't win for losin'.Filed under: PeripheralsATI Stream goes fisticuffs withNVIDIA's CUDA in epic GPGPUtussle originally appeared onEngadget on Mon, 10 Aug 200908:57:00 EST. Please see our termsfor use of feeds. Read| Permalink|Email this| Comments
Get angry: AT&T changes contract to prevent class action lawsuits
By Nicholas Deleon (CrunchGear)
Submitted at 8/10/2009 7:30:21 AM
When was the last time you readyour AT&T contract? If youanswered “never,” then may Isuggest you take two minutes to look this over. That's right, unbeknownstto you, you just lost the ability toenter into a class action lawsuitagainst the mobile phone carrier.High five!
Top News/ Gadgets/
Leave a Comment
The biggest rage right now with all the cloud computer and mobile computing malarky is http://www.onlinebackupservicesnow.com as it allows users to back up data from anywhere with an internet connection