Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Ivica Trupcevic, A096 155 870 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

Ivica Trupcevic, A096 155 870 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

Views: 1,665|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of the respondent’s application for adjustment of status on grounds that he had failed to maintain lawful status for more than 180 days. The Board found that the filing of an application to extend nonimmigrant status did not confer lawful status under Section 245(k) of the INA, and the government’s delay in adjudicating the application did not qualify for the regulatory exception for "technical violations resulting from inaction of the Service." The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland and joined by Member Roger Pauley and Member Teresa Donovan.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of the respondent’s application for adjustment of status on grounds that he had failed to maintain lawful status for more than 180 days. The Board found that the filing of an application to extend nonimmigrant status did not confer lawful status under Section 245(k) of the INA, and the government’s delay in adjudicating the application did not qualify for the regulatory exception for "technical violations resulting from inaction of the Service." The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland and joined by Member Roger Pauley and Member Teresa Donovan.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Nov 15, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Visibility:Private
See more
See less

01/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Christina

Mudoch, Esq. 105 W Madiso Street, Suite 2200 Cicago, IL 60606-0000 Name: TRUPCEVIC IVCA
   
ecve ce  on Reve
Bard  Immgratn Appeas Oce  he Cerk
5 I 0 bu Pik, Sui 000 Fs Curc Vgini 050
OHS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel CHI 525 West Va Buren Street Cicago, L 60607  A 09-155870 Dae o t is otice: 11 /7 /2013
ncoe   coy f he Bord econ nd oe n e bovereece ce clore
a s:
Wedlan, Lida

Pauey Roger Donova Teesa

Sncerey
D
c
Don Cr Chef Clek
 sa
cket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Ivica Trupcevic, A096 155 870 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)
 
   J
Executive Oc

Imiaton Revew Decson of e Bod o miaton Appeals Fa Church� Vrgn

Fil: A096
 87 ia IL In : IVIA TRPEVI IN REMOVAL PROEEIGS APPEAL ON BEHAL OF RESPONDENT: hitina  Mudh Equi ON BEHALF OF HS: HARE: Dai M Wiliam Aitant if unel Dat: Nti: Se 27(a)()(B) I&N At  S § 227(a)()(B)n he nid Stae i ilatin  la APPLIATION: Adun f tat; lunay daue
V  7 3
e endnt a nat  itizen f oaia tiey aal a Imiatin Jde Db 0 20 diin dnyin i aiatin  adutnt f tatu nd tin 24(a) f the Immiatin and Natnality At 8 S § 2(a) and antin lnay du e aal ill b imi
We i an Imiatin ud tual detinatin inldin dibili tinatin  lea  8 FR § 0(d)()(i)
Unie Staes

Naiona Ass 'n f Rea Estae Boas
 S 8 49 (9) (a tual ndin  n laly enu" ely beau t a t eiibl i  th eidn) The Bad ie d  etin f la ietin uent and all th iu 8 F R § 00  ( )()(ii);
Mate o SB
2 I&N De 49 (BIA 208)  FATAL AND PROEDRAL HISTORY T lat t a nt i diu Th end inally ted th nitd Stata a tdn n  F ia and and hi tat t hat f an HB teay k  bay 8 99 ( at
;
Exh  ) Th net b kin  th ethdit Hita  Iaa h he  my at  tme f th iati u
On Auu 9 21 te ndnt led a mt utin uan f a diin ba  th nlin f an Iiatin Jud in a dint dn  in t alteati t hdu a auent In lit f the nlin ad in  eiin t tin i dend
ee
 R § 0()(7) W h  that unubhd   dnt ei ha n ea  bindin t
Cite as: Ivica Trupcevic, A096 155 870 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)
 
A096155 870 decision s a Nuclear Medicne Tecnolois (.J. a 1; Tr. a 37-38; E. 2 Tab G). Te resoden s auorized o or as a H-1 B emory orer until December 24 2001 (.J  1; Tr. at 32-33; Es. 3-1 3-2) Four days bereand on December 20 2001 e Meodis Hosias led a reques i e rmer mmiraion nd Naaization Serice (S") to etend e resondens H-B staus (J. a 2 E 3-3)
Te S issed a eues r Eidece on Febru 14 2002 d te Meodis Hosils sied addional eidence on May 9 2002 (J t 2) n July 23 2002 7 ons er te oin in e NS denied e eension ees (.J. a 2; E 3-4). Pior o e Ss decision on e H-B eension request te Metods Hosals ed  Aicaion  Alien Emoymen eicio Fo ETA 750 (labor cericaon") on bealf of e esonden i e Dearet of Labo on June 14 2002 (J. a 2 Eh 3-6). e abor cericaion s subsequey aoed on Seembe 19 2002 (.J  2; E. 3-6). n Noember 20 2002 e Meods Hosils d e resonden ed  mmir Peiion r Alien Worer (Fo -140) nd an Alication to ester Permnent esidence o Adust Saus (Form -485)  te S (.J. at 2; Es. 3-7 3-8) nited Sates Ctizensi d Immraio Serices (SCS") dened e reues o adus saus ndn a e resondent ad been ou of sus r more  180 days nd ad no coinuosly mnained
aw
sas (.J. a 2 E. 3-9)
Te mmiraion Jude deeined ta te resonden s sautoiy ineliible r adsen of satus r failure to mainain coinuous ll saus as reuired by section 245( c )(2) of e Ac d  e cod ot benet om e eemtio in secion 245(k) of e Ac because e as ou of saus r more  180 days (.J. a 5). More recsey e miaon Jude und at e resondens eriod of lal sats erminaed on e dae is nonimmin sas eired (December 24 2001) and e no ul of is on o r ecica reasos" eetica in sectio 245( c )(2) of te Ac dd no ecuse e sed la staus (.J a 5-6) Te mmiaon Jde based is conclusio o s deteinaion t e reuory denion of ecnica resons did not incude te bc-nd- rocess beeen te rmer NS and te resondens emloyer to obin addiional eidence (J  5-6
(citing
Ma f
--
23 &N Dec 677 (BA 2004))). Te mmrio Jude so underscored e dierence beeen accruin unla resence" as  rond of indmssbliy under section 212(a)(9)(B) of e Act 8 SC. § 1182(a)(9)(B) d te saory requemen n secion 245(c)(2) of e Ac to maintan lal saus (.J a 3 4 n4 6).
 Mc 1 2003 e ncions of e NS ere rsed to e Demen of Homeld Securiy (DHS") usu o e Homeld Security Ac of 2002 Pub. L. No. 107-296 116 Sa 2135
S Mar f D-J-,
23 &N Dec. 572 573 n1 (A.G. 2003). Te miaion Jude belieed ta e resonden mroerly conaed unlal
 pesece r assby pses e sen
22B
of e Ac
w
e connuous ll staus eqiremen  eliibiliy puoses under secion 245( c
)(2
of e Ac. n el te resoden does o e at te sdds r assessin unlal resence e te same s r ssessin meance of coiuos lal stas. n ts resec e oodersand  e to conceps der. Because e to rosons ae dieren oses deren les c y despie pe suercl smlarities beeen e o concets.
S
 cntinud
2
Cite as: Ivica Trupcevic, A096 155 870 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->