Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Cirano Abertano Leon-Nogales, A205 140 051 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

Cirano Abertano Leon-Nogales, A205 140 051 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 329|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge neglected to advise the respondent of his potential eligibility for cancellation of removal for nonpermanent residents in accordance with 8 CFR 1240.11(a)(2). The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge neglected to advise the respondent of his potential eligibility for cancellation of removal for nonpermanent residents in accordance with 8 CFR 1240.11(a)(2). The decision was written by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Nov 15, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
   
Executive Oe r Imigation Revew
Board of Immigraton Appeals ce of he Clerk
510 Lug Pk u 000  uc Vg 030
HS/ICE Oce of Chief Counsel -FLO P.O Box 2558 Phoenix, AZ 85002 Name: LEON-NOGALES, CRANO ABE   A 205-140-051 Date o this notice 1 /7/2013
Eosed s a copy of he Boar's decision  order n he bove-rerece case. nclosue
P Mb: Ak-Bh, Ch K
Sieely,
D
O
C
Dona Carr Che Cek
Lg  k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Cirano Abertano Leon-Nogales, A205 140 051 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)
 
US Department of Justice
ecutiv Oce r Imgration Review Fas Church, Vgiia
4
 File A205 140 051 -Forence,
re CO ERTAO LEONNOGALES
 REMOVAL POCEEN  PPEA
TION ON BEHALF OF ESPOEN Po Se ON BEAF OF D CHRGE Adrew Lpkid Assstt Chef Cousel
Decision of e Board of grao Appeals
Date:
NOV
0 7
Z
 Notice Sec. 212)6)A)i), I& N Ac (8 .C
§
182)6)A)i)] Prese wtou beg ated or paoled APPICATION emd e respoden, a ave and citze o exico, appeals e Juay 11, 2012, decso of he Imaio udge dig
reovable d antg s request r volut depe Te  epmet of Homed Secuty opposes he appeal We revew dings o c r ce eor,  bu quesios ola, iscreio, d judet, ad l other issues n appeals, de novo. 8 C.FR
§
1003 .1 d)3))The record wl be remande r er proceedgs Dng the pendecy of his appea, the respoen ed a oo to reope o appy r ajet o stats, accompied y evdence hat he clams was o availabe ug hs oral proceedgs espondet's Motion o eope at 5)Aplcable regatios pvie hat a otion o reoe "sha sate e ew cts at wil be rove a a heg o be e f he  moto s ted d shal be supored by adavts or other evdety mateial 8 CFR Te respondens Noce of Appeal and te motio o reope were sied by Atoey Aa  M Gs, who dd ot le a Fo EO27, Noce of Ey of Appeaace as Atoey or  epresenave ere e Bod Tus we il cosder he respondet o be po se, d a couesy copy of hs ecsion wl be se o Aoey Gs
2
he respoets gume on apeal as sae  hs Noce o Apea  NO) s hat hs aoey was not alowed o be presen and was ot oed of he heg despte avng

a  noce of appearance owever, a revie of he record d scpt o prceedgs does not reect ha a oce of appearce was led bere the mmigato Cour. Alhou he respodents c e couse, Aa M. Gas, sumed wt the NOA a copy o a Notce o Eny of Appece as  Attoey or Represetatve Bere e Imatio Cour  Fo EO2), sed eceber 21, 2011, ere s o cation at the  was ed wth e maton Cour Fter, e trnsc reveas ha the respondet staed ta he had ree  atoey e auel Coales, who ed o ape r s heag Tr at 5)
Cite as: Cirano Abertano Leon-Nogales, A205 140 051 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)
 
,
·A205 140 05 § 03.(c);
see Mater of Rajah,
2
l&N
 Dec 27, 38 BI 209) (staing ha e requiremes r a moio to remad are esseialy te sme as the reiremes r a mtio to reope)
atter of Coelho
20
&N
e 64, 4 (BIA 1992); 8 CFR § 0032c(4  additon, the regulaios provide that a motio  reope "sal o be graed unless i appers to te Board a eidece sog o be oered is maeria d was not aaiable ad could ot ae bee discovered or preseed a e rmer heag
Id.
Seio 24(a) of e A roides ha he Aoey Geeral may, i is discreon, adjs e sus of a alie to ta f a lawl permane resident if te alien ( ) makes  appiaio r such adusme, (2) is eigbe o receive  immigr visa d is admissibe to e Unied Saes r peen residece, d (3) as immediaely avaiabe o im  immia visa a e ime a is picaio is ed. In cojcion wi is moio o reope, which we cosre
a motio o remnd, e respoden as sbmited weny-tw docmes that predae  e Jary 1, 22, decisio of te Immigraio dge The respode as o roided a expain r why tis iatio was ot provided elier uer e as o estabised prima ie eigibity r adjset of sus, or as he sbmied  aplicaio r relief The respoden has  expained how e evidence e proided may have caged e utcme of te eng Tus, s new evidece does not warat a remnd r rter proceedigs
See ater of Raah supra.
Hweer, reiew of he srt of proeedigs idices ha e mmigraio udge did o adise te responden, who was not represeted below, of is pential eligibity r reief r nellaio of remal nder secti 0A() f te Iia d Nationaiy Act, 8 USC. § 229bb, i accordae wih 8 CR § 240 (a() (Tr a 80 Uder hese circumsces, we d i appropriae o remd is mater Te paies o remand sold be allowed o provide er evidence, icludig addiioal esimony, regardig e respode's eligibiliy r ccelaon of remoal e respdet als shold be arded  pouity to aply r ay oer rm of relief om remova r wich he may uenty be eligibe Accoringy, e lowing orders wil be entered ORDE: e record l be remded FUER ORDER Te recrd is remaded r her prceedigs cosisen wit e regoig opiio d r e ety of a ew decision
Cite as: Cirano Abertano Leon-Nogales, A205 140 051 (BIA Nov. 7, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->