You are on page 1of 30
4s acisoney CIVIL COVER SHEET eta eS rit sts Ses Svan aaa ren toe oa ear ete P gee ci av" : are Lifeguard Licensing Corp. a "Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, PRL USA Holdings, inc. SS re RO yeaa Funan CAUSE OF ACTON ere rie ca STATUTE ONGER WHEN TOU ARE FUNG SRO WINE ABST STENT OF EUNE) trademark infngement and unfair competition under 15 USC 1501 et seq. and NY Gen Bus. Law 348, Has this ora siniar case been previously fled n SONY at any ime? No?[Z] You? [Judge Previously Assignad yes. wes tis case Vol Invol C1 Disissed. NOL) ves CI tyes. ove dete aceseho!~ 2009 (PLACE AN) NW ONE-BOK ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT te ager [ewe tga: (pr oemee, meee, tonagg Fie tutetacr I CIS UNRTNOONCT aoe BeRIOHA Fe ote, List mira, tisi9 semen FIMO MEGOTWERE —ya09 AseAULT Lie § (70 Baus AewArED muse {18 Sirens ewe Kemaae 7m Se aoe tie tkeeee cio Roe cane so ose, OvERPAMMENT Sruseaes cis [Se Sieeeteemaiu Soceeh 10 EAR p Se Se (pees pe eee {es SSeurtiow, (58 Frees, tome SER Sane (EE, ae Him Siawoarosact | Jou seme Sauer vires BOMBA HSS SSEEIPS ono Grganonr ire Genet 1 ey Aarcurunas acts pevowsuncen staves Beccwuee scr EMA TAKSUTS 1 ALEnraNAct Lng, Eetraresot hr er acess reer or {169 erences se iain RR eet erie ee HY ee MO ea tm Hates, RORTRT™ Aea ma morenty is Ries saree aioe [Eowrons yen Meee smearen timo Sanat oe) tame apOnTENS fn Ma oe Serene vee es 11 Re REE Phen yma Goel He racer SSR |B BeBe jn co Sealy ae Been Cee ey See HES TBtticoOe? (sue Sena ao te Son Chaskaorandedn coment Dy SHECSF THis S ACLASS ACTION 20 Y0U GAIN THis CASE IS RELATED TOA CIV GASE NOW PENONNG NS ONY? SnoER RSP. 28 ifeo.Srate DEMAND 8 onHeR super, Docker NUMBER aoc YES any apnanted cor Suny Genano: elves ONO NOTE: Plesse sutmit at ne tre of fing n explanation of why coses ara doomed rind any EF NEDO TIE ‘ORIGIN Gs Di2a.remcveston (13 kensncesson 114 seraseser (5 trevtereetrem (16 wanasncr [1 7 soca niaves = D1 2b.renoree tom eee (PLACE ANT 2 THTORE BOX ORLY) 7\ "BASIS OF JURISDICTION IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE Give manner aus oon, Cage caer Cle tesrecy Smee NOTA PARTY} (28 USC 1322, 1441) GTiinsriP OF PRNGIFAL PARTIES FOR VERSTY GASES OEM (Place an (Xin one box for Paint anst ona box for Dafencant) sosencr tig arare We penn auNnr OPT Gralanecawanornen stare 11? UF PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) LIFEGUARD LICENSING CORP. 364 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NY 10018 NEW YORK COUNTY DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION. PRLUSA HOLDNGS, INC. 650 MADISON AVENUE 4103 FOULK RD. NEW YORK, NY 10022 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19803. NEW YORK COUNTY. NEW CASTLE COUNTY DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THS TIME, | HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: /ATTAN COheocone: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: _[] WHITE PLAINS (00 NOT chock ether box iis 3 PRISONER PETITION ) ij 7 IGNATURE_OF ATTORNEY OF REGORD ‘ADMITTEOTOPRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT for Soap i (Oe sarcasarninsae ff w 060» Me 4 ees Magistrate Judge is s0 Designated, J. Michael MeKtahon, Clerk of Court by. Deputy Clork, DATED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (NEW YORK SOUTHERN) Brad D. Rose, Esq. (BR 2740) brose@pryoreashman.com Lisa M. Buckley, Esq. (LB $541) fbuckley@ipryorcashman.com Nicole E. Kaplan, sq. (NK 6478) nkaplan@pryorcashman.com PRYOR CASHMAN LLP sp oat 3} Attorneys for Plaintiff pete " 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036-6569 (212) 421-4100 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LIFEGUARD LICENSING CorRP., Plaintiff, ~ against - POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, PRL USA HOLDINGS, INC., ‘Defendants. x Plaintiff Lifeguard Licensing Corp. (“Lifeguard”), by its attomeys, Pryor Cashntam LLP, as and for its Complaint against Defendants Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and PRL USA Holdings, Ine. (collectively “PRLC”), alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Inthis action, Lifeguard seeks injunctive relief end damages based upon PRLC’s infringement of Lifeguard’s federally registered LIFEGUARD® and LIFE GUARD® trademarks (the “Marks”), and acts of unfair competition engaged in by PRLC. PRLCis using virtually an exact replica of Lifeguard’s Marks on the same merchandise that Lifeguard uses its federally registered marks on (apparel) and is competing with Lifeguard in the same channels of trade,

You might also like