In support of their cross-motions for summary judgment or,
in the alternative, partial summary judgment, the parties submitted over 3000 pages of materials
1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID F. JADWIN, D.O.,Plaintiff,v.COUNTY OF KERN; PETER BRYAN (BOTHindividually and in his formercapacity as Chief Executive Of Kern Medical Center); IRWIN HARRIS, M.D.; and DOES 1 through 10,inclusive,Defendants.1:07-CV-00026-OWW-DLB MEMORANDUM DECISION ANDORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ ANDPLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTIONSFOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, INTHE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIALSUMMARY JUDGMENTI. INTRODUCTIONBefore the court are cross-motions for summary judgment or, inthe alternative, partial summary judgment, brought by PlaintiffDavid F. Jadwin, D.O. (“Plaintiff”) and, collectively, byDefendants County of Kern (“County”), Peter Bryan (“Bryan”) and Irwin Harris (“Harris”), M.D., on all eleven claims in Plaintiff’sSecond Amended Complaint. The following background facts are takenfrom the parties’ submissions in connection with the motions and other documents on file in this case.
Case 1:07-cv-00026-OWW-DLB Document 311 Filed 04/08/2009 Page 1 of 141