Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Xingchen Ye, A078 694 496 (BIA Nov. 8, 2013)

Xingchen Ye, A078 694 496 (BIA Nov. 8, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 544 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of whether the respondent abandoned his lawful permanent resident status where his prior attorney committed ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to submit evidence demonstrating the respondent’s continued ties to the United States. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane and joined by Member Garry Malphrus and Member Ana Mann.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of whether the respondent abandoned his lawful permanent resident status where his prior attorney committed ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to submit evidence demonstrating the respondent’s continued ties to the United States. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane and joined by Member Garry Malphrus and Member Ana Mann.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Nov 19, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Nightingale, Zachary, Esq.
US parm of Jsi
Executive Oce r Immigaion Review
Board of Immigration Appeals O ce of h Crk
5107
Leburg Pike, Sute
2000 Fals Churc,
Vrgna
20530
 Van Der Hout Brialiano
&
Nihtinale LLP SCE Oice of Chief Counse -SFR
PO
Box 26449 San rancisco CA 94126-6449 180 Sue Street Fih Foor San Fancisco CA 94104029 Name: YE XINGCHEN A 078-694-496 ate of tis notice 1182013
Enclosed is a co py of he Boad' ecisio a ore  he above-rerenced cae. cose
l Mb:
Malphrus, Ga
D.
Man Ana ane Hgh G.
Siceey,
D
 
c
t
Dona Ca Cie Cerk
yungc 
m:
ket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Xingchen Ye, A078 694 496 (BIA Nov. 8, 2013)
 

·
US
Depament
of
Jusce
Execuv Oc
e r Imiation
Rvw
Deciso of the Board omiton Appels FaJ Cuc, Vrgina
4
File A07 694 96  Fracico CA I e: XGCEN YE IN MOVAL PROCEDINS APPAL AND MOTON Dae O BEHALF OF REONDENT Zchary Nghigle Eque O BEHALF OF S ame B ildea Aia hief oe APLAO ermo of oceedg; reman
NOV -8 2013
e eode h apeaed  Immgrio dge decio of Aug  202 dg h e reode ha baoed hi w perme eie LR) u Whle he aeal w eig he repoe d  moio o remd, whch he Deparme of Homelan Secy DH) ha oed e record wil be ree o e mmigraio

udge We reiew r ce eo e ding of c icdig he deeio of creili made y e Imigraon ge.  CFR.
§
1003.d)(3)(i) We reiew de oo l oher e cldig wee he rie he e e elean burde of proof ad iue o dicreon 8 CF.R § 1003. (d)(3i) Were  ere e reode h  cooble cla of LR a he e i o e D o demorae by clear equoca and cocg edece ha e reoden anoed h au
Khosahm v. Holder
655 3d 4 (9 i 201).  oder o ify  a reuig reie  aie m be reig o  reued w perme redence er  empory ii abrod"
See ingh
v.
Reno
3  3 152 51 (9 Cr. 997).  rip i a emorary ii abroad" if a) i i r a relaiey hor eriod xed by ome eary een o b) e  wi eiae o he occuece of  ee ha  a reaob oibili of occing h a elaely ho eriod of ime.
 ee Chavez-Rmre
v
IN,
92 F.2 932 937

i 196 f he alie rip aoa i o relaiey ho"   a emory ii abroad" oly if e ae a a coiuou uieuped ieo o re o he ied ae drg e eiey of er i"
 ee Khodaghon v Ahcro,
35 F3d 00
9 Cr. 203
For
o b odrd
 eauaig

epone ne o eu o  ne Se il
"h
ie fiy ie ropery olig a be fio wi e nie Se ad e lie fiy poey d ie ie in e reg coy."
 ngh
v
Reno upr

5-5
e epod w gd R a in 200 ad wa pce  remoa procedig i Ar 2010 e Imigao dge d a e eoden ha abdoe hi  ciig o he c a bewee 200 d 2010 e repode en
a
a ume of day in e ed Se d e go ried a cden and ard  own bie  a.
a!

_
X ' wk
Cite as: Xingchen Ye, A078 694 496 (BIA Nov. 8, 2013)
 

AQ78 694 96 The mmgraton Judge speccally noted the deh of documenty evdnc of th resodent's tes to the Unted States J at 1, th ac of afdavts om famy or ends (J at 12-13, he lack of proof
at he mantaned any renta unts or had any propry oneshp n the Unted Stats .J a 1, 12. h hs moton, the respondent· has submed evdence of hs nted tates busness tes Moton, Exhs. B C6), adavts om hs Untd States ctzen amly membrs (Moto, Exh.
A
2, documntato of th
ba
accout h mantand n th ntd States (Exh A12, as w as vdence he says dcates that, durng h years n quston, he pad rnt to mant a resence here Moton, Exh A2 ad ownd, rgstred and pd xes on h car whch h kpt n the Unted States (Moton, Exh. A, 5-8 The resondet hs aso submd medca evdece regardng hs ther's nss and deah whch he sad caued hm to rman n Chna n 2 as wl as evdence of hs on medcal probem hat h sad deayd hs r n 21 (Moto, Exhs D d E Athough the vdence proerd by the rspondnt was prevousy valabe, he assers a cam of nectve sstce of counse aganst hs er aoey r fang to advs he respodnt to produc such evdence Moton, at 142 He also cams hat hs aoey ed to advse hm of the consequences o a rmoval order, namely t yar ba om retng to he Unted tates, ad dd not gve hm the oton of whdrang or renouncng s L staus (Moton, at 23 Tr at 1-8) The respondent has comled th the requrments set rh n n
Mate of Loada
9 &N Dec. 637 BA 1988, r nectve assstance of counse cams Moton, Exh , 25 W w remand r the mmgraton Judge to evauate th neectve assstace cam ad to detern whether th respondent h estabshed the rqust prudce
See Det
v
Holder
627 .3d 36, 373

Cr. 21 prjudce mens that the outcome of h proceedng may hav ben aected by th alleged volaton).
Accordngy, th owng ordrs shal be enterd RDE e respondnts moton to rmd s granted TE ORDE: Th record w be remandd to the mmgaton Judge r her rocdngs consstnt h te regong onon nd r th ntry of a new decson
R
THE BAD
1
Gv our dsosto o th moton, we need not adjudcate th respondnt's appa at ts tme 2
Cite as: Xingchen Ye, A078 694 496 (BIA Nov. 8, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->