OSFC Report, Ayer Elementary School

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem
Program Type Setting Assessment Name Assessment Date Cost Set: Building Name Building IRN Building Address Building City Building Zipcode Building Phone Acreage Current Grades: Teaching Stations Number of Floors Student Capacity Current Enrollment Enrollment Date
Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP) Suburban Ayer Elementary School (65391) FINAL 2013-08-22 2013 Ayer Elem 65391 8471 Forest Rd Cincinnati 45255 513-474-3811 10.00 K-6 40 1 379 663 2013-08-20
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken. Number of Classrooms Historical Register Buildings Principal Building Type 32 NO Mr. Chris Flanagan Elementary/Middle Next Page
Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem
Page 1
Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21
Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Ayer Elem(65391)
North elevation photo:
East elevation photo:
South elevation photo:
West elevation photo:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION 56,113 Total Existing Square Footage 1973,1993 Building Dates K-6 Grades 663 Current Enrollment 40 Teaching Stations 10.00 Site Acreage Ayer Elementary School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, and originally constructed in 1973, is a 1 story, 56,113 square foot brick school building located in a suburban residential setting. The existing facility features an Open Concept design, and does not utilize modular buildings. The structure of 1973 Original Construction contains a steel frame with a non-load bearing exterior brick veneer on concrete masonry type exterior wall construction. The structure of 1993 Addition contains a brick veneer loading bearing wall type exterior wall construction. The overall facility has concrete masonry units, brick, ceramic tile, wood, metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board, demountable partitions and operable partition type wall construction in the interior. The floor system of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction. There are no intermediate floors in this single story structure. The roof structure of the overall facility, except for over the Gymnasium, is metal form deck on steel joist type construction. The roof structure over the Gymnasium is tectum deck on steel joist type construction. The roofing system over the 1973 Original Construction is a combination of a fully adhered EPDM membrane roof that was installed over phases in 1987 and 1993, and a modified asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat that was installed over phases in 1993, 1995, and 2005. The roofing system over the 1993 Addition is a modified asphalt built-up roof with gravel wear coat that was installed in 1993. The ventilation system of the building is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The Open Concept Classrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education and Student Dining spaces consist of one Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility is inadequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The building has a compliant manual and automatic fire alarm system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 10 acre site adjacent to residential properties. The property and playgrounds are partially fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is dedicated space for school buses to load and unload on the site. Parking for staff, visitors and community events is adequate. This facility was constructed with the same Open Concept floor plan as Sherwood Elementary School.
Previous Page Next Page
Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Ayer Elem(65391)
Page 2
Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391)
Name
Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet 1 1 52,725 3,388
Original Construction 1973 no Classroom Addition 1993 yes Previous Page Next Page
Building Construction Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391)
Page 3
Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391)
Addition Original Construction (1973) Classroom Addition (1993) Total
Auditorium Agricultural Primary Media Vocational Student Indoor Adult Board Outside Auxiliary Fixed Corridors Education Kitchen Natatorium Gymnasium Center Space Dining Tracks Education Offices Agencies Gymnasium Seating Lab 968 3279 4859 2528 2371
968
3,279
4,859
2,528
2,371
Master Planning Considerations
There are no readily evident site conditions that might significantly affect master planning. Due to the size of the site, future building expansion is not recommended. Previous Page Next Page
Building Component Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391)
Page 4
Existing CT Programs for Assessment

Next Page Previous Page Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet No Records Found Legend: Not in current design manual In current design manual but missing from assessment
<Untitled>
Page 5
Main Assessment Menu - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391)
Building Summary - Ayer Elem (65391)

District: Name: Forest Hills Local SD Ayer Elem Cincinnati,OH 45255 Bldg. IRN: 65391 Current Grades Proposed Grades Current Enrollment Projected Enrollment Addition K-6 N/A 663 N/A Acreage: Teaching Stations: Classrooms: County: Contact: Phone: Hamilton Mr. Chris Flanagan 513-474-3811 By: By: Julie Apt Julie Apt Area: Southwestern Ohio (1)
Address: 8471 Forest Rd
Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 Date Revised: 2013-10-29 10.00 40 32 Cover Sheet
CEFPI Appraisal Summary Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 100 200 100 200 200 200 1000 69 126 66 157 137 138 693 69% 63% 66% 79% 69% 69% 69% Borderline Borderline Borderline Satisfactory Borderline Borderline Borderline
Date HA Number of Floors Current Square Feet 1.0 The School Site Original Construction 1973 no 1 52,725 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features Classroom Addition 1993 yes 1 3,388 3.0 Plant Maintainability Total *HA *Rating = Handicapped Access =1 Satisfactory =2 Needs Repair =3 Needs Replacement *Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction FACILITY ASSESSMENT Cost Set: 2013 A. Heating System B. Roofing C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning D. Electrical Systems E. Plumbing and Fixtures F. Windows G. Structure: Foundation H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys I. Structure: Floors and Roofs J. General Finishes K. Interior Lighting L. Security Systems M. Emergency/Egress Lighting N. Fire Alarm O. Handicapped Access P. Site Condition Q. Sewage System R. Water Supply S. Exterior Doors T. Hazardous Material U. Life Safety V. Loose Furnishings W. Technology X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost Rating 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 56,113 4.0 Building Safety and Security 5.0 Educational Adequacy 6.0 Environment for Education LEED Observations Commentary Total
Dollar Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates Assessment C $1,914,575.56 - C=Under Contract $250,512.50 98.14% $33,056.50 - Renovation Cost Factor $9,440,627.56 $910,713.99 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $145,200.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $163,456.90 - requested from a Master Plan. $7,200.00 $90,361.00 $0.00 $2,073,584.86 $280,565.00 $131,865.55 $56,113.00 $88,169.50 $148,627.60 $383,269.28 $0.00 $0.00 $54,500.00 $15,315.00 $180,121.60 $168,339.00 $635,328.37 $1,888,676.01 $9,619,551.22 Previous Page
Total
Page 6
Original Construction (1973) Summary

Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 Date Revised: 2013-10-29 10.00 40 32 Cover Sheet
CEFPI Appraisal Summary Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 100 200 100 200 200 200 1000 69 126 66 157 137 138 693 69% 63% 66% 79% 69% 69% 69% Borderline Borderline Borderline Satisfactory Borderline Borderline Borderline
Dollar Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates Assessment C $1,798,977.00 - C=Under Contract $208,087.50 98.14% $31,362.50 - Renovation Cost Factor $8,892,602.36 $855,726.75 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $140,200.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $151,518.10 - requested from a Master Plan. $6,550.00 $82,362.25 $0.00 $1,988,438.22 $263,625.00 $123,903.75 $52,725.00 $83,087.50 $147,950.00 $363,382.77 $0.00 $0.00 $44,500.00 $15,281.10 $169,280.00 $158,175.00 $596,968.11 $1,779,039.01 $9,061,139.56
Total
Page 7
Classroom Addition (1993) Summary

Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 Date Revised: 2013-10-29 10.00 40 32 Cover Sheet Section
CEFPI Appraisal Summary Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category 100 200 100 200 200 200 1000 69 126 66 157 137 138 693 69% 63% 66% 79% 69% 69% 69% Borderline Borderline Borderline Satisfactory Borderline Borderline Borderline
Dollar Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates Assessment C $115,598.56 - C=Under Contract $42,425.00 98.14% $1,694.00 - Renovation Cost Factor $548,025.20 $54,987.24 - Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $5,000.00 - The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is $11,938.80 - requested from a Master Plan. $650.00 $7,998.75 $0.00 $85,146.64 $16,940.00 $7,961.80 $3,388.00 $5,082.00 $677.60 $19,886.51 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $33.90 $10,841.60 $10,164.00 $38,360.26 $109,637.00 $558,411.66
Total
Page 8
Facility Assessment
A. Heating System
Description:
The existing system for the 1973 Original Construction is an electric fired ducted packaged and split HVAC unit type system, installed in 1973, and is in fair to poor condition. The existing system for the 1993 Addition is an electric fired ducted roof top heat pump type system, installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. 2-pipe vs. 4-pipe designations are not applicable in this facility due to the AC system being a DX type cooling system which is not compliant with OSDM requirements. Heated air in the 1973 Original Construction is provided via a central Governair packaged HVAC unit, along with multiple ducted split HVAC units (with deck mounted air handlers and roof top condensing units) manufactured by Carrier, and is distributed to terminal units consisting of induction units with re-heat coils and air handlers. Cabinet heaters are also present. The terminal equipment was installed in 1973 and is in fair to poor condition. Heated air in the 1993 Addition is provided by multiple Trane roof top ducted heat pumps and distributed to the Classroom and other associated spaces in the Addition. The terminal equipment was installed in 1993 and is in fair condition. The system does not appear to comply with the 15 CFM per person fresh air requirements of the Ohio Building Code mechanical code and Ohio School Design Manual. The pneumatic and digital/electric type system temperature controls are original to each addition and are in fair to poor condition. The system does not feature individual temperature controls in all spaces required by the OSDM. The overall system does not feature any central energy recovery systems. The facility is equipped with louvered interior doors to facilitate Corridor utilization as return air plenums. The existing system is ducted, but the ductwork cannot be integrated into a possible future system due to arrangement, air volume, and routing of existing ductwork. The overall heating system is evaluated as not being in safe and efficient working order, and long term life expectancy of the existing system is not anticipated. The structure is equipped with central electric fired DX air conditioning in the 1973 Original Construction only. The site does not contain underground fuel tanks. 3 Needs Replacement Provide new overall heating, ventilating, and air conditioning system to achieve compliance with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual standards. Replace existing ductwork to facilitate efficient exchange of conditioned air. Unit Whole Building Original Classroom Construction (1973) Addition (1993) 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Required Required Required Required Sum Comments
Rating: Recommendations:
Item
Cost
HVAC System $26.12sq.ft. Replacement: Convert To Ducted $8.00sq.ft. System Sum:
$1,465,671.56(includes demo of existing system and reconfiguration of piping layout and new controls, air conditioning) $448,904.00(includes cost for vert. & horz. chases, cut openings, soffits, etc. Must be used in addition to HVAC System Replacement if the existing HVAC system is non-ducted)
$1,914,575.56 $1,798,977.00
$115,598.56
Cabinet Heater Back to Assessment Summary
HVAC System Temperature Controls
Facility Assessment
Page 9
Facility Assessment
B. Roofing
Description:
The roof over the 1973 Original Construction is a combination of a fully adhered EPDM Firestone and Carlisle membrane system that was installed over phases in 1987 and 1993, and is in fair condition and a modified asphalt built-up system with gravel wear coat that was installed over phases in 1993, 1995, and 2005, and is in good to fair condition. The roof over the 1993 Addition is a modified asphalt built-up system with gravel wear coat that was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. There are no District reports of current leaking. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof was gained by an access hatch with roof access ladder that is in good condition. Fall safety protection cages are not required and are not provided. There were no observations of standing water on the roof. Metal cap flashings and copings are in good condition. Roof storm drainage is addressed through a system of roof drains, which are properly located, and in good to fair condition. The roof over the 1973 Original Construction is not equipped with overflow roof drains, though they are not required on this building. The roof over the 1993 Addition is equipped with overflow roof drains in sufficient quantity and in good condition. No problems requiring attention were encountered with any roof penetrations. There are not any covered walkways attached to this structure. 3 Needs Replacement The roof over the overall facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system and due to condition, except for roof area with modified asphalt built-up system with gravel wear coat over the Classroom wing replaced in 2005. New flashing is included in roof replacement. Provide exterior roof access ladder for access to roof over the Gymnasium. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 16,619 Required 7 Required $250,512.50 $208,087.50 $42,425.00 Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 3,394 Required Sum Comments
Item
Built-up Asphalt:
$12.50sq.ft. (Qty) Other: Exterior Roof Access $50.00ln.ft. Ladder Sum:
$250,162.50 $350.00Provide exterior roof access ladder for access to roof over the Gymnasium.
Roof Over the 1973 Original Construction Back to Assessment Summary
Roof Over the 1993 Addition With Overflow Drains
Facility Assessment
Page 10
Facility Assessment
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description:
The 1973 Original Construction is equipped with an electric fired ducted roof top type central air conditioning system, installed in 1973, and in fair condition. The central Governair ducted packaged roof top unit provides cooling air via induction units with reheat coils and air handlers. The terminal equipment was installed in 1973 and is in fair condition. Window units are provided in a single Office location of the 1973 Original Construction. Isolated room systems consisting of ducted deck mounted air handlers with DX cooling condensing units located on the roof are provided in the 1993 Addition. The ventilation system in the overall facility consists of air handlers, original to each addition and in fair condition, providing fresh air to Classrooms, and other miscellaneous spaces as Gymnasium, Student Dining, and Media Center. Relief air venting is provided by air handlers, central relief fans, and return air grilles located in the utility island in each Classroom. The ceiling is then utilized as a return air plenum. The ventilation system does not appear to meet the Ohio Building Code 15 CFM per occupant fresh air requirement. The overall system is not compliant with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Dust collection systems are not required in this facility. The Art program is equipped with a kiln, and existing kiln ventilation system is inadequate, and in fair condition. General building exhaust systems for Restrooms, Storage Rooms, Art Rooms, and Custodial Closets appear adequately placed, but are in fair condition. 2 Needs Repair Provide an air conditioning system to meet with Ohio Building Code and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Pricing included in Item A. Replace general building exhaust systems located in Restrooms, Storage Rooms, and Custodial Closets. Replace the existing Art Program kiln ventilation system due to age, condition, and non-OSDM compliance. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 1 Required Required $31,362.50 Classroom Addition Sum Comments (1993) 3,388 ft! $5,000.00 Required $28,056.50Replace general building exhaust systems located in Restrooms, Storage Rooms, and Custodial Closets. $1,694.00
Item
Kiln Exhaust System: Other: General Building Exhaust System Sum:
$5,000.00each $0.50sq.ft. $33,056.50
Packaged Roof Top HVAC Unit Back to Assessment Summary
1973 Original Condition Air Handling Unit
Facility Assessment
Page 11
Facility Assessment
D. Electrical Systems
Description:
The electrical system provided to the 1973 Original Construction is a 277/480 volts, 2000 amp, 3 phase and 4 wire system installed in 1973, and is in fair condition. The system in the 1993 Addition is an extension of that found in the 1973 Original Construction. Power is provided to the school by a single utility owned, pad-mounted transformer located at the rear of the facility, and in fair condition. The panel system, installed in 1973 with upgrades in 1993, is in fair condition, and cannot be expanded to add additional capacity. The Classrooms are not equipped with adequate electrical outlets. The typical Classroom contains three (3) general purpose outlets, zero (0) dedicated outlets for each Classroom computer, and one (1) dedicated outlet for each Classroom television. Some Classrooms are equipped with as many as four (4) general purpose outlets, while others are equipped with as few as two (2) general purpose outlets. There are not any spaces that have no electrical outlets. The Corridors are equipped with adequate electrical outlets for servicing. Adequate GFI protected exterior outlets are not provided around the perimeter of the building. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator. Adequate lightning protection safeguards are not provided. Stage lighting power system including control panel, breakers, and dimmers is inadequately provided, in fair condition and does not meet OSDM requirements. The overall electrical system does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements in supporting the current needs of the school, and will be inadequate to meet the facilitys future needs. 3 Needs Replacement The entire electrical system requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines due to age, condition, lack of OSDM-required features, and to accommodate the addition of an air conditioning system. Provide an emergency generator, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Provide adequate lightning protection safeguards in the overall facility, including associated grounding system, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Provide control panel, dimmers, and breakers to support the Stage lighting system, with funding included in the electrical system replacement. Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! Required Classroom Sum Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! Required Comments
Item
Cost
Unit Whole Building
System Replacement: Sum:
$16.23sq.ft.
$910,713.99(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generator for life safety systems. Does not include telephone or data or equipment) (Use items below ONLY when the entire system is NOT being replaced)
$910,713.99 $855,726.75
$54,987.24
Main Electrical Distribution Panel Back to Assessment Summary
Pad Mounted Transformer
Facility Assessment
Page 12
Facility Assessment
E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description:
The 3 service entrance is equipped with a 3 reduced pressure back flow preventer in good condition. A water treatment system is provided and is in good condition, though none is needed. The domestic water supply piping in the overall facility is copper, is original to each addition, and is in good condition. The waste piping in the overall facility is cast iron and PVC, is original to each addition, and is in good condition. The facility is equipped with one Rheem 119 gallon electric water heater, installed in 2002, and one AO Smith 119 gallon electric water heater, installed in 2002. Both water heaters are in good condition. The school contains 3 Large Group Restrooms for boys, 3 Large Group Restrooms for girls, no Locker Room Restrooms for boys, no Locker Room Restrooms for girls, 1 Restroom associated with specialty Classrooms, and 4 Restrooms for staff. Boys Large Group Restroom contains 1 ADA and 3 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, no ADA and 10 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinals, 1 ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories, as well as 2 half round wash basins. Girls Large Group Restroom contains 2 ADA and 9 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilets, 1 ADA and 2 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories, as well as 2 half round wash basins. No Locker Room Restrooms are provided in this facility. Staff Restrooms contain no ADA and 4 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve toilet, no ADA and 1 non-ADA wall mounted flush valve urinal, as well as no ADA and 4 non-ADA wall mounted lavatories. Condition of fixtures is good. The facility is equipped with 1 wall mounted drinking fountain, as well as 1 ADA and 3 non-ADA electric water coolers, in fair condition. The 32 Elementary Classrooms are equipped with 3 ADA and 18 non-ADA sink mounted type drinking fountains, in fair condition. Special Education Classroom is equipped with the required Restroom facilities. Kitchen is not equipped with the required Restroom. Heath Clinic is equipped with the required Restroom, and fixtures are in fair condition. Kindergarten Classrooms are not equipped with Restroom facilities. Kitchen fixtures consist of 3 single compartment sinks, 1 triple compartment sink, 1 dishwasher, and 1 hand sink, which are in good condition. The Kitchen is not equipped with a grease interceptor. The Kitchen is provided the required 140 degree hot water supply via a booster type water heater, which is in good condition. The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures. Relative to LEED requirements, the school is not equipped with low flow type fixtures. Per OBC and OSDM requirements this facility should be equipped with 12 toilets, 4 urinals, 14 lavatories, 34 Classroom sink mounted drinking fountains, and 7 electric water coolers. Observations revealed that the school is currently equipped with 21 toilets, 12 urinals, 16 lavatories, 4 half round wash basins, 21 Classroom lavatories with sink mounted drinking fountains, 1 wall mounted drinking fountain, and 4 electric water coolers. ADA requirements are not met for fixtures and drinking fountains (see Item O). Custodial Closets are properly located and are adequately provided with required service sinks or floor drain sinks, which are in good to fair condition. Science Classrooms / Project Laboratories are not equipped with required natural gas connections, utility sink, compressed air connections, and safety shower / eyewash. Due to existing grade configuration, no Biology or Chemistry Classroom acid waste systems are required. Adequate exterior wall hydrants are provided. 2 Needs Repair To facilitate the schools compliance with OBC and OSFC fixture requirements, provide 13 new Elementary Classroom lavatories mounted type drinking fountains, provide 3 new electric water coolers, and 1 new grease interceptor for the Kitchen. Due to age, condition, LEED, and OSFC requirements, replace 4 half round wash basins with 4 ADA three station modular lavatories, replace 21 Elementary Classroom lavatories mounted type drinking fountains, provide 4 new electric water coolers and 54 new low flow flush valves and faucets. See Item O for replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. Provide the Science Classroom with the required natural gas connection, utility sink, compressed air connection, and safety shower / eyewash station. Kindergarten Classrooms, Kitchen, Health Clinic, Locker Room Restrooms, and Showers corrected in Item O. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 15 Required 7 Required 48 Required 4 Required 1 Required 1 Required 1 Required 1 Required 1 Required 30 Required $145,200.00 $140,200.00 4 Required $5,000.00 Classroom Sum Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! Comments
Item
Sink: Electric water cooler: Replace faucets and flush valves Three Station Modular Lavatory HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Safety Shower/Eyewash - New Installation HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Utility Sink HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Natural Gas Connections HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed Air Connections HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LAB TYPES 5,6,7 - Grease Trap or Oil Interceptor Other: Lavatory Mounted Type Drinking Fountain Sum:
$2,500.00unit $3,000.00unit $500.00per unit $4,000.00unit $2,500.00each $2,400.00unit $800.00each $15,000.00per system $6,000.00each $500.00per unit
6 Required
$37,500.00(new) $21,000.00(double ADA) $27,000.00(average cost to remove/replace) $16,000.00(remove / replace) $2,500.00 $2,400.00 $800.00 $15,000.00 $6,000.00 $17,000.00Provide new lavatory mounted type drinking fountains at existing Classroom lavatory.
Facility Assessment
Page 13
Typical Kindergarten Classroom Lavatory Back to Assessment Summary
Clinic Toilet Room
Facility Assessment
Page 14
Facility Assessment
F. Windows
Description:
The 1973 Original Construction is equipped with two window systems. The first system is equipped with aluminum frame windows with single pane glazing, which was installed in 1973, and is in fair condition. The second system is equipped with thermal broken aluminum frame windows with double glazed insulated glazing, which was installed in 1993, and is in good to fair condition. The window systems feature operable windows at all openings and operable windows are equipped with opening limiters in good to fair condition. Insect screens are only provided for the 1973 window system and are in good to fair condition. Window system seals are in good condition, with no air and water infiltration being experienced. Window system hardware is in good to fair condition. The 1973 Original Construction does not meet the OSDM requirement for providing window openings equal to 5% of the Classroom floor area. The 1993 Addition is equipped with thermally broken aluminum frame windows with double glazed insulated glazing type window system, which was installed in 1993, and is in fair condition. Broken seals in the insulated glazing was observed in most of the windows. The window system features operable windows throughout the addition, and operable windows are equipped with opening limiters in good to fair condition. Insect screens are not provided. Window system seals are in good to fair condition, with no air and water infiltration being experienced. Window system hardware is in good to fair condition. The window systems in the overall facility feature surface mounted blinds, which are in fair condition. This facility is not equipped with any curtain wall systems. This facility does not feature any glass block windows. The exterior doors in the 1973 Addition are equipped with aluminum frame sidelights and transoms with tempered single pane glazing, in fair condition. Exterior door vision panels are tempered single pane glazing. The exterior doors in the 1993 Addition are equipped with hollow metal frame sidelights and transoms with tempered double glazed insulated glazing, in fair condition. Exterior door vision panels are tempered double glazed insulated glazing. The school does not contain skylights. The school does not contain clerestories. The interior glass is not OSDM-compliant due to non-compliance with current Ohio Building Codes. Window security grilles are not provided for ground floor windows. There is not a Greenhouse associated with this school. 3 Needs Replacement Replace the existing window systems in the overall facility due to age and condition with a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Replace single pane transoms and sidelights at exterior doors in the overall facility. Replace non-code compliant interior glazing in the 1973 Original Construction. Provide new windows as required to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements for Classroom windows. Provide new skylights as required to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements for Classroom windows. Exterior door vision panel replacement is addressed in Item S in exterior door replacement scope. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 91 Required 540 Required 630 Required 360 Required 324 Required $163,456.90 $151,518.10 43 Required $11,938.80 Classroom AdditionSum Comments (1993) 3,388 ft! 188 Required $15,930.90(includes blinds) $81,000.00Provide new skylights as required to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements for Classroom windows. $47,250.00Provide new windows as required to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements for Classroom windows. $9,000.00Replace non-code compliant interior glazing in the 1973 Original Construction. $10,276.00Replace single pane transoms and sidelights at exterior doors in the overall facility.
Item
Insulated Glass/Panels: Other: New Skylight Openings Other: New Window Openings Other: Replace Non-Compliant Interior Glazing Other: Replace Transoms and Sidelights Sum:
$57.10sq.ft. (Qty) $150.00sq.ft. (Qty) $75.00sq.ft. (Qty) $25.00sq.ft. (Qty) $28.00sq.ft. (Qty)
1973 Original Construction Kitchen Windows Back to Assessment Summary
1993 Addition Window with Broken Glazing Seals
Facility Assessment
Page 15
Facility Assessment
G. Structure: Foundation
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed no locations of significant differential settlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in good to fair condition. Minor cracking and spalling were observed through the overall facility. The District reports that there has been no past leaking issues related to foundations. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to foundation or wall structural deterioration. 2 Needs Repair Repair areas of minor cracking and spalling through the overall facility.
Item
Cost
Unit
Whole Building
Other: Repair Hairline Cracks and $10.00sq.ft. Spalling (Qty) Sum:
Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 655 Required $6,550.00
Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 65 Required $650.00
Sum
Comments
$7,200.00Repair areas of minor cracking and spalling through the overall facility.
$7,200.00
Exposed Concrete Foundation
Exposed Concrete Foundation in the 1973 Original Construction Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 16
Facility Assessment
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description:
The 1973 Original Construction has a steel frame with a non-load bearing exterior brick veneer on concrete masonry which displayed some locations of deterioration, and is in good to fair condition. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in good to fair condition. The 1993 Addition has a brick veneer load bearing wall system which displayed a few locations of deterioration, and is in good to fair condition. Control joints are provided at some lintel locations, at some doors and windows, building corners, and wall offsets and are in good to fair condition. The school does contain expansion joints between the 1973 Original Construction and the 1993 Addition which are in good condition. Exterior walls in the 1973 Addition are inadequately insulated. Exterior walls in the 1993 Addition are adequately insulated. Brick veneer masonry walls in the 1973 Original Construction are non-conforming cavity walls. Brick veneer masonry walls in the 1993 Addition are cavity walls. Weep holes are provided in the 1973 Original Construction in sufficient quantity at 36 inches on center at lintels, below sills, and the base of masonry cavity walls, and are in good condition. Weep holes are not rope type weeps. Vents are not provided. Weep holes are provided in the 1993 Addition in sufficient quantity at 24 at lintels, below sills, and the base of masonry cavity walls, and are in good condition. Weep holes are not rope type weeps. Vents are provided in sufficient quantity. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows some evidence of mortar deterioration and has locations of discoloration and algae. Architectural exterior accent materials consist of ceramic tile and metal fascia panels, which are in good to fair condition. Interior walls are concrete masonry units, brick, wood, metal stud with gypsum board, operable partition walls and demountable partitions and are in good to fair condition. Interior masonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in good condition. Interior soffits are acoustical tile and gypsum board type construction, in good to fair condition. The window sills are an element of the aluminum window system, and are in good condition. The exterior lintels are precast steel, and are rusting in fair condition. There are no chimneys. A canopy is provided over the main entrance to the 1973 Original Construction, and is in good condition. Exterior soffits are a plaster type construction, and in good to fair condition. The school is provided with a covered concrete conventional loading dock to facilitate the receipt of product, supplies, and foodstuffs, 85 square feet in size and featuring a steel coiling type overhead door. The dock itself is in good to fair condition, and is equipped with bumper pads in fair condition. 2 Needs Repair Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall facility. Provide masonry cleaning, sealing and caulking as required through the overall facility. Provide masonry repairs as required through the overall facility. Repair loading dock as required. Recaulk existing control joints. Prep and paint exposed steel lintels through the overall facility. Repair and paint damaged soffit areas. Replace loading dock bumper pads. Exterior wall insulation deficiencies are addressed in Item J. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 1,222 Required 13,576 Required 13,576 Required 2,244 Required 3 Required 85 Required 543 Required 153 Required 647 Required 2,048 Required $90,361.00 $82,362.25 65 Required 54 Required 116 Required 21 Required $7,998.75 Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 120 Required 1,496 Required 1,496 Required 284 Required Sum Comments
Item
Tuckpointing: Exterior Masonry Cleaning: Exterior Masonry Sealing: Exterior Caulking: Other: Loading Dock Bumper Pads Other: Loading Dock Repairs Other: Masonry Repairs Other: Prep and Paint Steel Lintels Other: Recaulk Exterior Control Joints Other: Repair and Paint Exterior Soffits Sum:
$5.25sq.ft. (Qty) $1.50sq.ft. (Qty) $1.00sq.ft. (Qty) $5.50ln.ft. $100.00each $15.00sq.ft. (Qty) $12.75sq.ft. (Qty) $8.00sq.ft. (Qty) $5.50ln.ft. $8.00sq.ft. (Qty)
$7,045.50(wall surface) $22,608.00(wall surface) $15,072.00(wall surface) $13,904.00(removing and replacing) $300.00Replace loading dock bumper pads. $1,275.00Repair loading dock as required. $7,752.00Provide masonry repairs as required through the overall facility. $1,656.00Prep and paint exposed steel lintels through the overall facility. $4,196.50Recaulk existing control joints. $16,552.00Repair and paint damaged soffit areas.
Facility Assessment
Page 17
Plaster Soffit at the 1973 Original Construction Loading Dock Back to Assessment Summary
Typical Wall Condition of the 1973 Original Construction
Facility Assessment
Page 18
Facility Assessment
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description:
The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab on grade type construction, and is in good condition. There is no crawl space. There are no intermediate floors in this single story structure. Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in required renovations. The roof construction of the overall facility, except for over the Gymnasium, is metal form deck on steel joist type construction, and is in good condition. The roof construction over the Gymnasium is tectum deck on steel joist type construction, and is in good condition. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Item CostUnitWhole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)SumComments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Roof Structure Over the Gymnasium Back to Assessment Summary
Roof Structure Over the 1973 Original Construction
Facility Assessment
Page 19
Facility Assessment
J. General Finishes
Description:
The overall facility features Open Space Classrooms with carpet type flooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, as well as painted block and operable type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Corridors with carpet, ceramic tile, and VCT type flooring, acoustical type ceilings, as well as painted block, operable, and brick type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Restrooms with ceramic tile type flooring, painted gypsum type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Toilet partitions are painted steel or plastic, and are in fair condition. Classroom casework in the overall facility is wood type construction with plastic laminate tops, is inadequately provided, and in fair to poor condition. The typical Classroom contains 5 lineal feet of casework, and Classroom casework provided ranges from 5 to 10 feet. Classrooms are provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards, which are in fair condition. The Classroom storage cubbies and rooms, located in the Classrooms, are adequately provided, and in fair condition. The Art program is equipped with a kiln in good condition, and existing kiln ventilation is inadequate. The facility is equipped with wood louvered interior doors that are flush mounted without proper ADA hardware and clearances, and in fair condition. Classrooms are an open floor plan and are not equipped with doors. The Gymnasium space has rubber type flooring, exposed steel frame type ceilings, as well as acoustic painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The Gymnasium is not provided with stands. Gymnasium basketball backboards are a fixed type, and are in good condition. The Media Center, located in the center of the Classroom plan, has carpet type flooring, acoustical type ceilings, as well as painted block and operable type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Student Dining has VCT type flooring, acoustical tile type ceilings, as well as painted block type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. OSDM-required fixed equipment for Stage is inadequately provided, and in fair to poor condition. Existing Gymnasium, Student Dining, Media Center, and Music spaces are inadequately provided with appropriate sound attenuation acoustical surface treatments. The existing Kitchen is full service, is sized correctly based on current enrollment, and the existing Kitchen equipment, provided in the 1973 Original Construction, is in fair condition. The Kitchen hood is in good condition, and is equipped with the required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6 overhang on all three exposed sides of the cooking equipment is provided by the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction and material, and installed as required by the OSDM and OBCMC. The walk-in cooler and freezer are located within the Kitchen spaces, and are in fair to poor condition. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, K, L, M, N, T, U, W, and due to condition. Provide for replacement of interior doors, due to poor condition and work in Item O. Provide for replacement of walk-in cooler/freezer. Provide sound attenuation treatment in the Music Room, Student Dining, Gymnasium, and Media Center. Provide for partitions in Open Space Classrooms. Provide for additional exterior wall insulation, per Item H. Provide for the replacement of Kitchen equipment due to condition and age. Provide for the replacement of Stage equipment due to condition. Provide for the replacement of toilet accessories due to age and condition. Provide for the replacement of toilet partitions due to age and condition. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 17 Required Required Required Classroom Sum Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! Comments
Item
Toilet Partitions: Toilet Accessory Replacement Partition Open Space Classrooms: Door, Frame, and Hardware: Additional Wall Insulation Walk-in Coolers/Freezers: Total Kitchen Equipment Replacement:
$1,000.00per stall $0.20sq.ft. $8.00sq.ft. $1,300.00each $6.00sq.ft. (Qty) $29,818.00per unit $190.00sq.ft. (Qty)
Other: Acoustical Control
Other: Complete Replacement of Finishes and Casework Percentage of Elementary School Other: Complete Replacement of $15.58sq.ft. Finishes and Casework Percentage of (Qty) Middle School Other: Stage Equipment $14,000.00allowance Sum:
$3.00sq.ft. (Qty) $15.60sq.ft. (Qty)
$17,000.00(removing and replacing) $10,545.00(per building area) Required $448,904.00(per building sq.ft., CMU in corridors and drywall partitions between classrooms) 58 Required 4 Required $80,600.00(non-ADA) 13,576 Required $81,456.00(includes the furring out of the existing walls, insulation and abuse resistant GWB) 2 Required $59,636.00 2,371 Required $450,490.00(square footage based upon only existing area of food preparation, serving, kitchen storage areas and walk-ins. Includes demolition and removal of existing kitchen equipment) 11,924 Required $35,772.00Provide sound attenuation treatment in the Music Room, Student Dining, Gym, and Media Center. 44,186 Required 2,880 Required$734,229.60(elementary, per building area, with removal of existing)
8,539 Required
508 Required $140,952.26(middle, per building area, with removal of existing)
Required $2,073,584.86$1,988,438.22 $85,146.64
$14,000.00Provide for the replacement of Stage equipment due to condition.
Facility Assessment
Page 20
Typical Corridor Finishes
Typical Gymnasium Finishes Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 21
Facility Assessment
K. Interior Lighting
Description:
The typical Classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Classroom fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 40 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical Corridors in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixtures with single level switching. Corridor fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 27 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Gymnasium spaces are equipped with T-5 1x4 surface mount type lighting, in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 57 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Media Center is equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 41 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Student Dining spaces are equipped with T-8 2x2 and 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Student Dining fixtures are in fair to poor condition, providing an average illumination of 81 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Kitchen spaces are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting with single level switching. Kitchen fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 67 FC, which is less than the 75-80 FC recommended by the OSDM. The Service Areas in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. The typical Administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with T-8 2x4 lay-in direct fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, providing adequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School Design Manual requirements due to age and condition, inadequate lighting levels, and lack of multi-level switching. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to age and condition, inadequate lighting levels, lack of multi-level switching, and the installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, J, and U.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Complete Building Lighting Replacement$5.00sq.ft. Required Required $280,565.00Includes demo of existing fixtures Sum: $280,565.00 $263,625.00 $16,940.00
Student Dining Fluorescent Light Fixtures Back to Assessment Summary
Classroom Fluorescent Light Fixtures
Facility Assessment
Page 22
Facility Assessment
L. Security Systems
Description:
The overall facility contains a GE NetworX NX-6V2 motion detector and door contact type security system in fair condition. Motion detectors are adequately provided in main entries, central gathering areas, Offices, main Corridors, and spaces where 6 or more computers are located. Exterior doors are equipped with door contacts. An automatic visitor control system is provided. 5 compliant color CCTV exterior cameras are provided at main entry areas and parking lots. No interior CCTV cameras are provided. CCTV is monitored in Administrative Area with the use of a LCD monitor and Speco Technologies computer based hard disk recording device and multiplexer, which are in good condition. A compliant computer controlled access control system integrating alarms and video signals, with appropriate UPS backup, is not provided. The system is not equipped with card or biometric readers, but is equipped with a KeriSystems key pad door access control system. The security system is not adequately provided throughout, and the system is not compliant with Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. The playground fencing requires attention as it does not fully comply with OSDM requirements since the site is not fully fenced for security. The exterior site lighting system is equipped with surface mounted HID metal halide, recessed HID metal halide, and incandescent entry lights in good to fair condition. Pedestrian walkways are illuminated with surface and pole mounted HID metal halide fixtures in good to fair condition. Parking and bus pick-up / drop off areas are illuminated by pole mounted HID metal halide fixtures in good to fair condition. The exterior site lighting system provides inadequate illumination due to insufficient fixture capacity and sparse placement of fixtures. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of security system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide partial replacement and enhancement of exterior site lighting system, consisting of additional lighting fixtures and replacement of incandescent lighting, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide additional fencing, with funding included in complete replacement of security system. Original Classroom Construction (1973) Addition (1993) 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Required Required Required Required $7,961.80 Sum Comments
Item
Cost Unit Whole Building $1.85sq.ft. $0.50sq.ft.
Security System: Other: Partial Site Lighting Upgrade Sum:
$103,809.05(complete, area of building) $28,056.50Provide partial replacement and enhancement of exterior site lighting system, consisting of additional lighting fixtures and replacement of incandescent lighting.
$131,865.55 $123,903.75
Broken Pole Mounted Pedestrian Light
Surface Light Fixture With Security Camera Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 23
Facility Assessment
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with an emergency egress lighting system consisting of non compliant red lettered, LED, plastic construction illuminated exit signs, and the system is in fair condition. The facility is equipped with emergency egress floodlighting, and the system is in fair condition. The system is provided with appropriate battery backup. The system is adequately provided throughout, meets Ohio Building Code requirements, but does not meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of emergency / egress lighting system to meet Ohio School Design Manual and Ohio Building Code guidelines.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Emergency/Egress Lighting:$1.00sq.ft. Required Required $56,113.00(complete, area of building) Sum: $56,113.00 $52,725.00 $3,388.00
Emergency Egress Lighting System In the 1973 Original Construction Back to Assessment Summary
Emergency Egress Lighting System In the 1993 Addition
Facility Assessment
Page 24
Facility Assessment
N. Fire Alarm
Description:
The overall facility is equipped with a Simplex 4010 addressable type fire alarm system, installed in 1973, and in fair condition, consisting of manual pull stations with horn and strobe indicating devices. The system is automatic and is monitored by a third party. The system is equipped with sufficient audible horn and strobe indicating devices. The system is not equipped with any smoke detectors, heat sensors, flow switches and tamper switches. The system thus will not support future fire suppression systems without flow and tamper switches. The system is adequately provided throughout, and does have additional zone capabilities. The system is compliant with Ohio Building Code, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual requirements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of the Fire Alarm System, including smoke detectors, and heat sensors, fire alarm system to meet OBC, NFPA, and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide flow and tamper switches for a future sprinkler system. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! Required 1 Required $88,169.50 $83,087.50 $5,082.00 Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! Required Sum Comments
Item
Fire Alarm System: Other: Tamper and Flow Switch Monitor Device Sum:
$1.50sq.ft. $4,000.00per system
$84,169.50(complete new system, including removal of existing) $4,000.00Provide flow and tamper switches for a future sprinkler system.
Original Horn and Strobe Indicating Device Back to Assessment Summary
Original Fire Alarm Panel
Facility Assessment
Page 25
Facility Assessment
O. Handicapped Access
Description:
At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloading zone to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. The exterior entrances are mostly ADA accessible. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. Building entrances should be equipped with 1 ADA power assist door, and none are provided. Playground layout and equipment are mostly compliant. On the interior of the building, space allowances and reach ranges are mostly compliant. There is not an accessible route through the building, which does not include protruding objects. Ground and floor surfaces are compliant. Steps to the Gymnasium do not meet all ADA requirements, and are insufficient due to non-compliant handrails. Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by 2 non-compliant steps in good condition and 1 compliant lift in good condition. Special provisions for floor level changes in this single story structure have been appropriately addressed by installation of a chair lift. Access to the Stage is facilitated by a Corridor at Stage level and is in good condition. Interior doors are not recessed, are not all provided adequate clearances, and are not provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 18 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 4 are currently provided. 18 ADA-compliant Restroom lavatories are required, and 6 are currently provided. 1 ADA-compliant Science Classroom lab sink is required, and none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 1 is currently provided. 0 ADA-compliant showers are required, and none are currently provided. 4 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 1 is currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal and plastic, and do provide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are adequately provided and mounted. Not all mirrors meet ADA requirements for mounting heights. Science Classrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to non-compliant ADA lab sinks and base cabinets. Art Classrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to non-compliant ADA sinks and base cabinets. Staff and Health Clinic Restrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements due to lack of ADA-compliant accessories and appropriate ADA clearances. Kitchen and Kindergarten Classroom Restrooms are not provided. ADA signage is not provided on the interior or the exterior of the building. 2 Needs Repair Provide ADA-compliant signage, 1 power assist door opener, 6 toilets, 4 sinks, 4 urinals, 3 toilet partitions, and 9 doors and frames in the overall facility to facilitate the schools meeting of ADA requirements. Enlarge and reconfigure new single ADA Toilet Rooms for 2 Staff and 1 Health Clinic Toilet Rooms, including 3 toilets, 3 sinks and 3 sets of ADA accessories in the 1973 Original Construction. Remount 3 mirrors to meet ADA mounting heights. Provide ADA pipe wrap insulation for 1 ADA lavatory in the Boys Large Group Restrooms. Add 3 new single ADA Toilet Rooms for the Kitchen and 2 Kindergarten Classrooms, including 3 toilets, 3 sinks, and 3 sets of ADA accessories. ADA electric water coolers are corrected in Item E. ADA compliant sink base casework in the Classrooms is corrected in Item J. For interior doors that are not being replaced under this Item, door hardware to be replaced with funding provided in Item J. Steps to the Gymnasium are corrected in Item U. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! Required 14 Required 3 Required 1 Required 9 Required Classroom Sum Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! Required Comments
Item
Signage: Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: Toilet Partitions: ADA Assist Door & Frame: Replace Doors:
$0.20sq.ft. $1,500.00unit $1,000.00stall $7,500.00unit $5,000.00leaf
Remount Restroom Mirrors to $285.00per Handicapped Height: restroom Other: ADA Pipe Wrap $50.00each Insulation Other: ADA Restroom. $10,000.00each
3 Required 1 Required 3 Required
$11,222.60(per building area) $21,000.00(replacement ADA) $3,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included) $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc) $45,000.00(rework opening and corridor wall to accommodate ADA standards when door opening is set back from edge of corridor and cannot accommodate a wheelchair.) $855.00 $50.00Provide ADA pipe wrap insulation for ADA compliance. $30,000.00Add Toilet Room to meet ADA requirements (includes fixtures, walls, door and hardware, floor drain, and supply lines from nearby existing Restroom). $30,000.00Enlarge and reconfigure existing Toilet Room to meet ADA requirements (includes fixtures, walls, door and hardware, floor drain, and supply lines from existing Restroom).
Other: Reconfigure Toilet Rooms for ADA Accessibility Sum:
$10,000.00each
3 Required
$148,627.60 $147,950.00
$677.60
Facility Assessment
Page 26
Narrow Entrance To the Music Room
Special Education ADA Toilet Room Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 27
Facility Assessment
P. Site Condition
Description:
The 10 acre flat site is located in a suburban residential setting with moderate tree, shrub, and floral type landscaping. Outbuildings include a small storage shed. There are slight and apparent problems with erosion or ponding in the rear of the building and near boarders of the parking lot. The site is bordered by lightly traveled city streets. A single entrance onto the site impedes proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one way bus traffic is provided. A bus loop is provided for student loading and unloading, which is separated from other vehicular traffic. Staff and visitor parking is facilitated by an asphalt parking lot in fair condition, containing 99 parking places, which provides adequate parking for staff members, visitors, and the disabled. The site and parking lot drainage design, consisting of sheet drainage, catch basins, and storm sewers, provides adequate evacuation of storm water on parking lots. Concrete curbs in poor condition are appropriately placed. Concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logical flow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair condition. Trash pick-up and service drive pavement is heavy duty and is in fair condition, and is not equipped with a concrete pad area for dumpsters. Exterior steps are provided with a compliant handrail connected to the loading and service dock. Concrete steps and steel guardrail are in good to fair condition. Site fencing is partially provided for playground area, but does not separate the area from vehicular traffic. The playground equipment is primarily constructed of metal or high density plastic, and is in good condition. Playground equipment is placed to provide compliant fall zones, and on a compliant wood fiber mulch of sufficient depth. Hard surface play area, with a basketball court and painted games such as four square is provided on an asphalt surface. The site is equipped with sufficient tables and benches in fair condition. The athletic facilities are comprised of two baseball diamonds and a practice field, and are in fair condition. Site features are suitable for outdoor instruction, which is enhanced through the Districts provision of tables and benches. There are no readily evident site conditions that might significantly affect master planning. Due to the size of the site, future building expansion is not recommended. 2 Needs Repair Provide for a concrete dumpster pad. Provide for the replacement of the asphalt wear layer due to condition. Provide for the replacement of heavy duty asphalt. Replace concrete sidewalks as required due to condition. Replace concrete curbs as required due to condition. Provide site contingency allowances for unforeseen conditions. Provide for soil erosion control due to condition. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 3,801 Required 4,377 Required 1,504 Required 96 Required 3,563 Required 1 Required Required Classroom Sum Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 243 Required 279 Required 96 Required 6 Required 227 Required Comments
Item
Replace Existing Asphalt Paving (heavy duty): Asphalt Paving / New Wearing Course: Concrete Curb: Concrete Sidewalk: Stabilize soil erosion: Provide Concrete Dumpster Pad: Base Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances Sitework Allowance for Unforeseen Circumstances for buildings between 0 SF and 100,000 SF Sum:
$30.00sq. yard $18.65sq. yard $17.87ln.ft. $4.69sq.ft. (Qty) $2.50sq.ft. (Qty) $2,400.00each $50,000.00allowance
$121,320.00(including drainage / tear out for heavy duty asphalt) $86,834.40(includes minor crack repair in less than 5% of paved area) $28,592.00(new) $478.38(5 inch exterior slab) $9,475.00(includes stripping and re-grading) $2,400.00(for two dumpsters) $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two. (Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item) $84,169.50Include this one or the next. (Each addition should have this item)
$1.50sq.ft.
Required
Required
$383,269.28 $363,382.77
$19,886.51
Playground Equipment
Asphalt Paving and Concrete Sidewalks
Facility Assessment
Page 28
Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 29
Facility Assessment
Q. Sewage System
Description: Rating: Recommendations:
The sanitary sewer system is tied in to the municipal system, and is in fair condition. No significant system deficiencies were reported by the school district or noted during the physical assessment. 1 Satisfactory Existing conditions require no renovation or replacement at the present time.
Sanitary Manhole Back to Assessment Summary
Sanitary Waste Piping
Facility Assessment
Page 30
Facility Assessment
R. Water Supply
Description:
The domestic water supply system is tied in to the municipal system, features 3 service and 3 water meter, and is in fair condition. The District was not able to provide water supply flow test data. The existing domestic water service appears to meet the facilitys current needs. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system, and the existing water supply will not provide adequate support for a future system. The domestic water service is not equipped with a water booster pump, and none is required. The system does not provide adequate pressure and capacity for the future needs of the school. 1 Satisfactory Provide a new city water supply line of adequate capacity to support the existing needs of the facility, as well as a future automated fire suppression system. Funding provided in Item U.
Incoming Domestic Water Service Line Back to Assessment Summary
Incoming Domestic Water Service Backflow Preventers
Facility Assessment
Page 31
Facility Assessment
S. Exterior Doors
Description:
Typical exterior doors in the 1973 Original Construction are aluminum type construction, installed on aluminum frames, and in good to fair condition. Typical exterior doors feature single glazed tempered glass or no vision panels, and appropriate hardware. Typical exterior doors in the 1993 Addition are hollow metal type construction, installed on hollow metal frames, and in good to fair condition. Typical exterior doors feature insulated tempered glass vision panels and transoms in good to fair condition, and appropriate hardware. Entrance doors in the 1973 Original Construction are aluminum type construction, installed on aluminum frames, and in good to fair condition. Entrance doors feature single glazed tempered glass vision panels, transoms, sidelights, and appropriate hardware. Entrance doors in the 1993 Addition are hollow metal type construction, installed on hollow metal frames, and in fair condition. Entrance doors feature insulated tempered glass vision panels and transoms, and appropriate hardware. The facility is not equipped with any roof access doors. There is one steel coiling overhead door in the 1973 Original Construction in fair condition. 3 Needs Replacement Replace all aluminum and hollow metal exterior doors and frames in the overall facility, due to age and condition. Replace overhead door in 1973 Original Construction. Replacement of single glazed transoms and sidelights is addressed in Item F Cost Unit
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:$2,000.00per leaf 21 Required 5 Required $52,000.00(includes removal of existing) Overhead doors and hardware: $2,500.00per leaf 1 Required $2,500.00(8 x 10 sectional, manual operation) Sum: $54,500.00 $44,500.00 $10,000.00
Main Entrance Doors at the 1973 Original Construction
Typical Classroom Doors in the 1973 Original Construction Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 32
Facility Assessment
T. Hazardous Material
Description:
The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by M.A.C. Paran Consulting Services, Inc., and dated January 30, 2009, documenting known and assumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials. The AHERA Reports referenced only assumed asbestos containing materials. An Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment (EEHA) will need to be conducted in order to establish abatement budgets. Vinyl asbestos floor tile and mastic, sheet flooring, and possible Tartan flooring containing hazardous materials are located in the overall facility in fair condition. These materials were described in the report and open to observation and found to be in non-friable condition with light damage. There are no underground storage tanks on the site. Due to the construction date, there is a potential for lead based paint. Fluorescent lighting will require special disposal. 3 Needs Replacement Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the overall facility, as noted in the attached Environmental Hazards Assessment. Provide for the testing of paint that has the potential of being lead-based. Provide for disposal of fluorescent lighting. Cost Unit
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! Environmental Hazards Form EHA Form EHA Form Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups$1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00 Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $1.00per unit 5,000 Required 0 Required $5,000.00 Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration $0.10sq.ft. (Qty) 5,311 Required 339 Required $565.00 Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal $4.00sq.ft. (Qty) 220 Required 0 Required $880.00 Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic $3.00sq.ft. (Qty) 1,290 Required 0 Required $3,870.00See J Sum: $15,315.00 $15,281.10 $33.90
VAT Flooring
Carpet with VAT Flooring Below Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 33
Facility Assessment
U. Life Safety
Description:
The overall facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. Exit Corridors are situated such that dead-end Corridors are not present. Stair towers and guardrails are not present in this single story structure. The facility features one exterior concrete stairway providing egress from the Loading Dock, which is in good condition. The Kitchen hood is in good condition, and is equipped with the required UL 300 compliant wet chemical fire suppression system. The required 6 overhang of the cooking equipment is provided by the hood. Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction, material, insulation, and installed as required by the OSDM and OBCMC. The cooking equipment is interlocked to shut down in the event of discharge of the fire suppression system. Fire extinguishers are provided in sufficient quantity. Existing fire extinguishers are adequately spaced. The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator. The existing water supply is provided by a tie-in to the municipal system, and is insufficient to meet the future fire suppression needs of the school. Rooms with a capacity greater than 50 occupants are equipped with adequate egress. 3 Needs Replacement Provide new automated fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide increased water service of a capacity sufficient to support the fire suppression system, funding included in fire suppression funding. Provide new emergency generator, with funding provided via complete replacement of electrical system in Item D. Provide new handrails to the Gymnasium to meet the requirements of the Ohio Building Code. Cost Unit Whole Building Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 52,725 Required 28 Required $180,121.60 $169,280.00 $10,841.60 Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 3,388 Required Sum Comments
Item
Sprinkler / Fire Suppression System:
$3.20sq.ft. (Qty) Other: New Handrails w/ Extensions & Rtns $20.00ln.ft. to wall Sum:
$179,561.60(includes increase of service piping, if required) $560.00Provide new handrails to the Gymnasium.
Typical Recessed Fire Extinguisher
Kitchen Hood With UL 300 Compliant Wet Chemical Fire Suppression System Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 34
Facility Assessment
V. Loose Furnishings
Description:
The typical Classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair to poor condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desks & chairs, desk height file cabinets, reading tables, computer workstations, bookcases, wastebaskets, and movable casework. The facilitys furniture and loose equipment were evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the overall facility received a rating of 6 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Design Manual required elements. 3 Needs Replacement Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furnishings.
Item
Cost Unit Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! CEFPI Rating 6$3.00sq.ft. Required Required $168,339.00 Sum: $168,339.00 $158,175.00 $10,164.00
Typical Student Tables Back to Assessment Summary
Typical Teacher Desk
Facility Assessment
Page 35
Facility Assessment
W. Technology
Description:
The typical 4 Classroom cluster in the Open Plan design is equipped with one cable port and monitor, and a 2-way PA system that can be initiated by either party to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. The typical Classroom is not equipped with the required four technology data ports for student use, one data port for teacher use, one cable port and monitor, one voice port with a digitally based phone system, and 2-way PA system that can be initiated by either party to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Due to the Open Plan design, teachers are issued portable two-way radios for communication with the Main Office. The facility is not equipped with a centralized clock system, but battery powered clocks throughout the facility. Specialized electrical and sound system requirements of Gymnasium, Stage, Student Dining, and Music spaces are inadequately provided, and in fair condition. OSDM-compliant computer network infrastructure is not provided. Wireless connection to the internet is provided throughout the facility. The facility does not contain a media distribution center, and does not provide Computer Labs for use by students, but provides for 8 mobile Computer Labs on secured laptop charging carts. 3 Needs Replacement Provide complete replacement of technology systems to meet Ohio School Design Manual requirements.
Item
Whole BuildingOriginal Construction (1973)Classroom Addition (1993)Sum Comments 52,725 ft! 3,388 ft! ES portion of building with total SF 50,000 to 69,360$11.51sq.ft. (Qty) 44,613 Required 2,867 Required $546,494.80 MS portion of building with total SF < 67,950 $10.29sq.ft. (Qty) 8,112 Required 521 Required $88,833.57 Sum: $635,328.37 $596,968.11 $38,360.26
Cost
Unit
Non-Compliant Computer Network Infrastructure
Typical Mobile Computer Lab On Secured Laptop Charging Cart Back to Assessment Summary
Facility Assessment
Page 36
Facility Assessment
X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) 7.00% Subtotal 16.29% Non-Construction Costs Construction Contingency $7,730,875.21 $541,161.26 $8,272,036.47 $1,347,514.74 $9,619,551.22
Total Project
Construction Contingency Non-Construction Costs Total for X.
$541,161.26 $1,347,514.74 $1,888,676.01
Non-Construction Costs Breakdown Land Survey Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code) Construction Testing Printing - Bid Documents Advertising for Bids Builders Risk Insurance Design Professionals Compensation CM Compensation Commissioning Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) Total Non-Construction Costs Back to Assessment Summary 0.03% 0.10% 0.25% 0.40% 0.15% 0.02% 0.12% 7.50% 6.00% 0.60% 1.12% 16.29% $2,481.61 $8,272.04 $20,680.09 $33,088.15 $12,408.05 $1,654.41 $9,926.44 $620,402.74 $496,322.19 $49,632.22 $92,646.81 $1,347,514.74
Facility Assessment
Page 37
School Facility Appraisal
Name of Appraiser Building Name Street Address City/Town, State, Zip Code Telephone Number(s) School District
Julie Apt Ayer Elem 8471 Forest Rd Cincinnati, OH 45255 513-474-3811 Forest Hills Local SD
Date of Appraisal
2013-08-22
Setting: Site-Acreage Grades Housed Number of Teaching Stations Student Enrollment Dates of Construction Energy Sources: Air Conditioning: Heating:
Suburban 10.00 K-6 40 663 1973,1993 Fuel Oil Roof Top Central Hot Water Gas Windows Units Roof Top Steam Floor Construction Wood Joists Steel Joists Slab on grade Structural slab Electric Central Individual Unit Solar Room Units Forced Air Building Square Footage Student Capacity Number of Floors 56,113 379 1
Type of Construction Load bearing masonry Steel frame Concrete frame Wood Steel Joists
Exterior Surfacing Brick Stucco Metal Wood Stone
Page 38
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
1.0 The School Site

Points Allocated
Points
1.1
Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements The site is 10 acres compared to 17 acres required by the OSDM.
25
10
1.2
Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population
20
16
The School is centrally located within the School District, and is easily accessible. The site is accessible from city streets that are suitable for buses, cars, and service vehicles.
1.3
Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the School site.
10
10
1.4
Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs
10
The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance.
1.5
ES MS HS
Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areas Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parking Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking
10
Playground areas consist of metal or high density plastic type play equipment, which is in good condition, and is located on wood fiber mulch which is an approved soft surface material. Play equipment is ADA accessible, and includes an accessible route to equipment. Fencing is partially provided but does not separate vehicular traffic from pedestrians.
1.6
Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines
The site is generally flat but provides positive drainage across the site. A flat area is provided to accommodate buildings, perimeter walks, vehicular circulation, parking areas, outdoor play areas, and physical education spaces, and is desirable.
1.7
Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion There are slight and apparent problems with erosion or ponding in the rear of the building and near parking perimeter.
1.8
Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning The site has been developed to accommodate outdoor learning, including benches and picnic tables to facilitate instruction.
1.9
Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes
Sidewalks are adequately provided to accommodate safe pedestrian circulation including designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes.
1.10
ES/MS HS
Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community
Adequate parking is provided for faculty, staff, and community parking, and is located on asphalt pavement in fair condition.
TOTAL - The School Site
100
69
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 39
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 40
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features

Structural
Points Allocated
Points
2.1
Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally Entire building is not ADA-compliant.
15
12
2.2
Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight
15
The roofs over the entire building are in good to fair condition, but require replacement due to age of systems over the 1973 Original Construction.
2.3
Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks Foundations are in good to fair condition with observable cracks and spalled areas.
10
2.4
Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration Exterior and interior walls are in good to fair condition, have sufficient control and expansion joints, and have areas of deterioration.
10
2.5
Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.
10
2.6
Building envelope generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) Building envelope does not meet minimum energy conservation requirements.
10
2.7
Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials The building was constructed in 1973 and is reported to contain non-friable asbestos.
10
2.8
Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes
10
The school is based on an open floor plan where Classroom sizes are dependent on the arrangement of loose furnishings. A flexibility of Classroom sizes are provided.
Mechanical/Electrical
Points Allocated
Points
2.9
Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating
15
Light sources are improperly placed and provide inadequate lighting in some areas. Fixtures are well maintained in most areas. Light fixtures do not appear to be subject to overheating.
2.10
Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements Internal water supply will not support a future fire suppression system, but is adequate for current requirements.
15
2.11
Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications Classrooms have an inadequate number of outlets and data jacks for technology applications.
15
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 41
2.12
Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible Disconnect switches are provided in required easily accessible locations to allow for safe servicing of equipment.
10
2.13
Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled
10
Drinking fountains are not adequate in number and placement, and do not meet ADA requirements. Drinking fountains are properly maintained.
2.14
Number and size of restrooms meet requirements
10
The OBC requires that Restrooms be located so that the maximum travel distance shall not exceed 500 feet. The facility meets the requirement.
2.15
Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements Adequate drainage systems are provided throughout the facility. Drainage systems are well maintained.
10
10
2.16
Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements
10
The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm systems are original to the facility and are not provided with required devices. Smoke detectors are not provided.
2.17
Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office and instructional areas
10
The central intercommunication system provides reliable communication between the Administration area and all teaching/learning areas, but is outdated and not used for contacting individual Classrooms due to Open Plan design.
2.18
Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage Exterior wall hydrants are adequately provided around the exterior of the facility.
TOTAL - Structural and Mechanical Features Back to Assessment Summary
200
126
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 42
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
3.0 Plant Maintainability

Points Allocated
Points
3.1
Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance Windows, doors and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance
15
12
3.2
Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care
15
12
Flooring throughout the facility consists of VCT, carpet, sealed concrete, rubber, and ceramic tile, which is well maintained throughout the facility.
3.3
Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain
10
Acoustical tile ceilings and operable walls are not easily cleaned or resistant to stain. Painted block, brick, and painted gypsum board type walls area easily cleaned and resistant to stain.
3.4
Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance Casework is wood type construction with plastic laminate tops, is inadequately provided and in fair to poor condition.
10
3.5
Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality Door hardware varies throughout the facility, and does not meet ADA requirements.
10
3.6
Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish Fixtures are wall mounted and are of good quality.
10
3.7
Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building Custodial storage space is adequately located throughout the facility, including provisions for water and drains.
10
3.8
Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area Electrical outlets are adequately provided in Corridors and allow for convenient routine cleaning.
10
3.9
Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement
10
Outdoor light fixtures are provided inadequately, but are accessible for repair and replacement. Electrical outlets are inadequately provided around the exterior of the facility.
TOTAL - Plant Maintainability Back to Assessment Summary
100
66
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 43
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
4.0 Building Safety and Security

Site Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.1
Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways Student loading is separated from vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways.
15
12
4.2
Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians Walkways are adequately provided both on and off-site for pedestrian safety.
10
10
4.3
Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area School signs and signals are located as required on adjacent access streets.
4.4
Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow
Buses and other vehicular traffic use the same entrance and exit points to the site, which does not provide safe vehicular traffic flow.
4.5
ES MS HS
Playground equipment is free from hazard Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazard Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard
Playground equipment consists of metal or high density plastic type equipment in good condition, is partially fenced, and is located on an approved soft surface material to a sufficient depth. Playground fencing does not provide a separation from vehicular traffic
Building Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.6
The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas Heating systems are located on the areas that are not accessible by students.
20
16
4.7
Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress The overall facility is one story without stair towers.
15
15
4.8
Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware Exterior doors open in the direction of travel and are equipped with panic hardware.
10
10
4.9
Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits Emergency light fixtures and exit signs are not on separate circuits, powered by battery, and are adequately provided.
10
4.10
Classroom doors are recessed and open outward
10
Art, Music Room, and Stage doors are adequately recessed, do not have proper ADA clearances, and open outward. There are no Classroom doors in the Open Concept Classrooms.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 44
4.11
Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program Security systems are inadequately provided and are in fair condition.
10
4.12
Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition VCT, carpet, sealed concrete, rubber, and ceramic tile flooring has been well maintained throughout the facility.
4.13
Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 Stair treads and risers are properly designed and meet requirements.
4.14
Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury Glass at door transoms and sidelights is tempered for safety.
4.15
Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall
Electric water coolers have not been recessed in the Corridor wall, but do not extend more than eight inches from the Corridor wall.
4.16
Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.
Emergency Safety
Points Allocated
Points
4.17
Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located
15
The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm devices are not provided adequately. Fire extinguishers are adequately provided and spaced.
4.18
There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building Multiple exits are provided from Corridors throughout the facility.
15
15
4.19
Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure
15
12
The structure in the 1973 Original Construction is a steel frame with a non-load bearing exterior brick veneer on concrete masonry with metal form or tectum deck on steel joists. The structure in the 1993 Addition is a brick veneer load bearing wall system with metal form deck or tectum deck on steel joists. Interior walls are brick, painted block, or painted drywall.
4.20
Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided
15
The fire alarm is provided with manual and automatic actuation, and is provided with horns. The fire alrm is not provided with visual indicating devices in all required areas.
TOTAL - Building Safety and Security Back to Assessment Summary
200
157
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 45
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
5.0 Educational Adequacy

Academic Learning Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.1
Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards The average Classroom is 849, 935, and 942 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM.
25
20
5.2
Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity Classrooms are large enough to allow effective small group activity spaces.
15
12
5.3
Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise The Gymnasium and Music program are properly isolated from the academic learning areas to reduce distractions.
10
5.4
Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students Open Plan Classrooms do not permit privacy time for individual students.
10
5.5
Storage for student materials is adequate Storage cubbies and rooms, located in the Classroom, are adequately provided for student storage.
10
5.6
Storage for teacher materials is adequate Miscellaneous wood and metal shelving units are inadequately provided for teacher storage.
10
Special Learning Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.7
Size of special learning area(s) meets standards Special Education Classrooms are appropriately sized, and meet standards.
15
12
5.8
Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need Special Education spaces are properly designed to meet instructional needs.
10
5.9
Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space
10
The Media Center is 4,859 SF compared to 2,321 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Media Center is an attractive space, including sufficient book storage space.
5.10
Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction The Gymnasium is 3,279 SF compared to 3,500-5,000 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.11
ES MS/HS
Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instruction Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment
10
Kindergarten spaces are adequate for age of students served. Kindergarten spaces are 1,440 SF compared to 1,200 SF recommended in the OSDM.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 46
5.12
Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space
Music instruction is provided on the 987 SF Stage without any sound treatment. Music instruction is also provided in a 832 SF room with acoustical treatment.
5.13
Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment
The Art Room is appropriately designed for instruction and includes sufficient space for storage of supplies and equipment. 1,307 SF is provided compared to 1,200 SF recommended in the OSDM.
Points Allocated
Points
5.14
Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment
The facility is not provided with Computer Labs for student use, provides eight mobile Computer Labs on secured carts, but does not meet OSFC requirements for technology.
5.15
Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms No spaces have been provided adjacent to Classrooms for small groups or remedial instruction.
5.16
Storage for student and teacher material is adequate
Storage cubbies and rooms have been adequately provided for storage of student materials. Casework is not adequately provided for storage of teacher materials.
Support Space
Points Allocated
Points
5.17
Teachers lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals
10
The Teachers Lounge does reflect a professional environment and includes adequate work space for preparation of teacher materials. 741 SF is provided compared to the 300 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.18
Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation
10
The Student Dining space is 2,528 SF compared to 3,000 SF recommended in the OSDM. The Student Dining space is attractive with adequate space for seating. The Kitchen is 2,371 SF compared to the 2,320 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.19
Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served Administrative Offices are adequately provided for Elementary and Middle School students.
5.20
Counselors office insures privacy and sufficient storage
The Counselors Office is 83 SF compared to 120 SF, without 100 SF for Storage and 200 SF for Conference, recommended in the OSDM.
5.21
Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements
The Clinic is 245 SF compared to 370 SF recommended in the OSDM. The undersized Clinic is located within the Administrative Offices and is provided with required equipment.
5.22
Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors
Limited reception space is provided for students, teachers, and visitors. 80 SF is provided compared to the 120 SF recommended in the OSDM.
5.23
Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy
The Administrative area consists of approximately 2,252 SF for the principal, assistant principal, secretary, Conference Room, Storage, Copy Room, and Restroom, compared to 2,600 SF recommended by the OSDM.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 47
TOTAL - Educational Adequacy Back to Assessment Summary
200
137
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 48
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
6.0 Environment for Education

Exterior Environment
Points Allocated
Points
6.1
Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students The building is a utilitarian design with standard detailing, which is aesthetically acceptable.
15
12
6.2
Site and building are well landscaped
10
The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance.
6.3
Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning The site is adjacent to residential uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the school site.
10
6.4
Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather The main entrance to the School is completely sheltered.
10
10
6.5
Building materials provide attractive color and texture Exterior building materials consist of brick, metal fascia panels and ceramic tile, which provides an acceptable color and texture.
Interior Environment
Points Allocated
Points
6.6
Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning
20
16
The color palette is comprised of a warm base with accent color of more saturated hues. School colors are reflected in the athletic areas. The use of repeated colors and materials gives the building some unity and a sense of consistency.
6.7
Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building The facility is equipped with DX air conditioning to provide year-round temperature and humidity control.
15
12
6.8
Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement
15
The ventilating systems do not provide an adequate quantity of ventilation air to the spaces. Ventilation systems introduce minimal noise into the teaching and learning areas.
6.9
Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination
15
The lighting system does not provide proper intensity in some areas. Location of lighting fixtures provides uneven distribution of illumination. Diffusion of illumination is adequately provided by the light fixture lenses.
6.10
Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located
15
12
The OBC requires one drinking fountain per 100 occupants. The building capacity requires 7 drinking fountains. The existing facility has 4 drinking fountains. ADA requires that 50 percent of drinking fountains be accessible. 4 of the drinking fountains are accessible. Classrooms are provided with drinking fountains.
6.11
Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization
10
There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining area and Gymnasium, as well as a gathering area at the entrance to the school.
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 49
6.12
Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors Corridors, egress paths, and Foyers are adequately designed for efficient traffic flow.
10
6.13
Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group
10
There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining area and Gymnasium, as well as a small gathering area at the entrance to the school.
6.14
Large group areas are designed for effective management of students The Gymnasium is adequately designed to manage large groups of students.
10
6.15
Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control Limited consideration has been given to acoustical treatment of Classrooms and Corridors.
10
6.16
Window design contributes to a pleasant environment The window openings do not meet the minimum OSDM standards for daylighting.
10
6.17
Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere Classroom furniture is mismatched and in fair to poor condition.
10
TOTAL - Environment for Education Back to Assessment Summary
200
138
CEFPI Ratings Sheet
Page 50
LEED Observation Notes

School District: County: School District IRN: Building: Building IRN: Sustainable Sites Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helps to prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits. Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructed, its important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:9) The amount of asphalt will contribute to a heat island effect for non-roofs (see SS Credit 7.1) and does not effectively maximize open space (see SS Credit 5.2). The size of the parking area exceeds the amount required with 99 parking spaces provided and 73 spaces required (see SS Credit 4.4). Roof surfaces have low reflectance and high thermal emittance and will contribute to a heat island effect. Cool Roofs are not currently utilized to reduce heat island effect (see SS Credit 7.2). Water Efficiency In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce water usage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Not only do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:65) Currently there are no measures to reduce wastewater or water usage. There are not areas in the landscape established to provide on-site retention as needed. Drainage is predominantly sheet flow toward catch basins which converge into the city storm system. There are minimal landscape features of grass, deciduous trees, conifers, shrubs, and some flora, with most of the open site being covered with asphalt and concrete. The overall facility does not contain any water-efficient fixtures or appliances to meet LEED requirements. The assessment calls for fixture replacement, which would include the addition of electrical flush sensors. In areas where electrical flush sensors could be costly and difficult to install, battery operated sensors would be best. Roof areas and drains are such that storm water retention / collection will be difficult to achieve. Energy & Atmosphere Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contribute to smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nuclear power creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also they will reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, its important to adopt a holistic approach to the buildings energy load and integrate different energy saving strategies. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:93) The overall facility is equipped with HVAC equipment that, due to age, condition, and inefficiency, does not provide appropriate energy controls or recovery to meet LEED requirements. The District does not produce their own energy or buy energy credits to meet LEED requirements. The site is such that solar panel installation could be accomplished. Material & Resources The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products and local materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources. Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:167) The facility does provide for storage and collection of recyclables (see MR Prerequisite 1). Indoor Environmental Quality As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategies involve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:215) Corridors and Classrooms feature hard, easy to clean surfaces, but do not provide acoustical measure other than ceiling tile (see EQ Credit 9). The overall facility is equipped with HVAC equipment that, due to age, condition, and inefficiency, does not provide appropriate indoor air quality or controls to meet LEED requirements. Existing site / building layout, coupled with existing window opening sizes, might make achieving some LEED credits difficult and costly. Innovation & Design Process This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process. (source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:271) This building does not implement innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge which exceed results which are required by the LEED Rating System. Forest Hills Local SD Hamilton 47340 Ayer Elem 65391
<Untitled>
Page 51
Justification for Allocation of Points
Building Name and Level:
Ayer Elem K-6
Building features that clearly exceed criteria: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The building is not ADA accessible. The facility does not have any fire suppression system and has a non-compliant fire alarm system. The facility has an Open Concept Classroom design with 663 students and a square foot design capacity of 437 students. The facility is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials. The facility does not provide Computer Labs for students. This facility does not provide for Locker Rooms and Science Labs for the 6th Grade. Back to Assessment Summary The facility is equipped with WIFI throughout the building. The Media Center is oversized and exceeds the OSDM.
Justification for Allocation of Points
Page 52
Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates

Owner: Forest Hills Local SD Facility: Ayer Elem Date of Initial Assessment: Aug 22, 2013 Date of Assessment Update: Oct 29, 2013 Cost Set: 2013 District IRN: 47340 Building IRN: 65391 Firm: SBDP
Scope remains unchanged after cost updates. Building Addition 1973 Original Construction 1993 Classroom Addition Total Total with Regional Cost Factor (98.14%) Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency Addition Area (sf) Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates Renovation Demolition 52,725 $15,281.10 $5,281.10 3,388 $33.90 $33.90 56,113 $15,315.00 $5,315.00 $15,030.14 $5,216.14 $18,702.05 $6,490.46
<Untitled>
Page 53
Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391) - Original Construction Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391) - Original Construction
Owner: Facility: Date:
Forest Hills Local SD Ayer Elem 2009-01-30
Bldg. IRN: BuildingAdd: Consultant Name:
65391 Original Construction MAC Paran
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal 2. Breeching Insulation Removal 3. Tank Insulation Removal 4. Duct Insulation Removal 5. Pipe Insulation Removal 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal 13. Fireproofing Removal 14. Hard Plaster Removal 15. Gypsum Board Removal 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal 18. Cement Board Removal 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal 22. Fire Door Removal 23. Door and Window Panel Removal 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel 25. Soil Removal 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic 30. Carpet Mastic Removal 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal 33. Sink Undercoating Removal 34. Roofing Removal 35. (Sum of Lines 1-34) 36. (Sum of Lines 1-12, 14-34) B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Location Age
AFM=Asbestos Free Material Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.00 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 220 $4.00 $880.00 Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 1290 $3.00 $3,870.00 Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $4,750.00 Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $4,750.00 None Reported Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Est.Rem.Cost $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1. 52725 5311 E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) 2. (Sum of Lines 1-0)
Addition Constructed after 1980 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00 Not Applicable Total Cost $531.10 None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00 $0.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost $0.10
Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A36, B1, D1, and E2 * INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM): a. b.
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$15,281.10 $5,281.10
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster, acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12""12" floor tile and mastic. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
c.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 54
Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391) - Classroom Addition Environmental Hazards - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem (65391) - Classroom Addition
Owner: Facility: Date:
Forest Hills Local SD Ayer Elem 2009-01-30
Bldg. IRN: BuildingAdd: Consultant Name:
65391 Classroom Addition MAC Paran AFM=Asbestos Free Material Estimated Cost $10.00 $0.00 $10.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $8.00 $0.00 $10.00 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 $12.00 $0.00 $30.00 $0.00 $15.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $25.00 $0.00 $7.00 $0.00 $6.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $5.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00 $4.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $150.00 $0.00 $2.00 $0.00 $300.00 $0.00 $300.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $2.00 $0.00 $1.00 $0.00 $3.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $2.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 None Reported
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) ACM Found 1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal 2. Breeching Insulation Removal 3. Tank Insulation Removal 4. Duct Insulation Removal 5. Pipe Insulation Removal 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal 13. Fireproofing Removal 14. Hard Plaster Removal 15. Gypsum Board Removal 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal 18. Cement Board Removal 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal 22. Fire Door Removal 23. Door and Window Panel Removal 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel 25. Soil Removal 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic 30. Carpet Mastic Removal 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal 33. Sink Undercoating Removal 34. Roofing Removal 35. (Sum of Lines 1-34) 36. (Sum of Lines 1-12, 14-34) B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks Tank No. 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Location Age
Status Quantity Unit Cost Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Not Present 0 Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work
Product Stored Size Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks
Est.Rem.Cost $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only 1. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Area Of Building Addition 1. 3388 339 E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks 1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) 2. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Description Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition
Addition Constructed after 1980 $0.00 $0.00 Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00 Not Applicable Total Cost $33.90 None Reported Cost Estimate $0.00 $0.00
Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts
Unit Cost $0.10
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries 1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 2. A36, B1, D1, and E2 * INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM): a. b.
Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition
$33.90 $33.90
Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster, acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12""12" floor tile and mastic. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
c.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
<Untitled>
Page 55

OSFC Report, Ayer Elementary School

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

OSFC Report, Ayer Elementary School

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem

Building Information - Forest Hills Local SD (47340) - Ayer Elem

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Ayer Elem(65391)

North elevation photo:

East elevation photo:

South elevation photo:

West elevation photo:

Previous Page Next Page

Building Pictures - Forest Hills Local SD(47340) - Ayer Elem(65391)

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet 1 1 52,725 3,388

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Addition Original Construction (1973) Classroom Addition (1993) Total

Master Planning Considerations

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Existing CT Programs for Assessment

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Building Summary - Ayer Elem (65391)

Address: 8471 Forest Rd

Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 Date Revised: 2013-10-29 10.00 40 32 Cover Sheet

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Original Construction (1973) Summary

Address: 8471 Forest Rd

Date Prepared: 2013-08-22 Date Revised: 2013-10-29 10.00 40 32 Cover Sheet

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Classroom Addition (1993) Summary

Address: 8471 Forest Rd

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

HVAC System $26.12sq.ft. Replacement: Convert To Ducted $8.00sq.ft. System Sum:

Cabinet Heater Back to Assessment Summary

HVAC System Temperature Controls

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

$12.50sq.ft. (Qty) Other: Exterior Roof Access $50.00ln.ft. Ladder Sum:

Roof Over the 1973 Original Construction Back to Assessment Summary

Roof Over the 1993 Addition With Overflow Drains

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Kiln Exhaust System: Other: General Building Exhaust System Sum:

$5,000.00each $0.50sq.ft. $33,056.50

Packaged Roof Top HVAC Unit Back to Assessment Summary

1973 Original Condition Air Handling Unit

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Unit Whole Building

System Replacement: Sum:

Main Electrical Distribution Panel Back to Assessment Summary

Pad Mounted Transformer

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Typical Kindergarten Classroom Lavatory Back to Assessment Summary

Clinic Toilet Room

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

1973 Original Construction Kitchen Windows Back to Assessment Summary

1993 Addition Window with Broken Glazing Seals

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Other: Repair Hairline Cracks and $10.00sq.ft. Spalling (Qty) Sum:

Original Construction (1973) 52,725 ft! 655 Required $6,550.00

Classroom Addition (1993) 3,388 ft! 65 Required $650.00

Exposed Concrete Foundation

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Report Generated at 29 Oct 2013 08:21

Typical Wall Condition of the 1973 Original Construction