• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Issue 2FREE
THE BEST OF NYC BLOGS ABOUT THE WORST OF NYC POLITICS
INSIDE:
Courageous Teacher Blows the Whistle p7Corruption and Dead Firemen p3Gutting Neighborhoods: Good Management?! p4
Because NoThird TermMEANS NoThird Term!
 
On Thursday, July 23, Fed Up New Yorkers held its sec-
ond meeting at the LGBT Community Center in the West
Village. More than 75 people gathered to hear members of the
FUNY coalition give testimony about the real impact theBloomberg administration has made on the lives of New
Yorkers.
“For the eight straight years that you have been in ofce,
the Rent Guidelines Board has systematically raised regulated
rents in our city,” said Louis Flores, a political blogger, “And
any time that the MTA has wanted to jack up our fares, it gets
away with it. You haven't even noticed that NYU is the sec-
ond-coming of Robert Moses, because while NYU is tearing
down historical houses or evicting cultural landmarks, you
have been busy closing down rehouses and advocating for 
the construction of more football stadiums.”
Judy Francis, a public parks advocate, said that “Mayor Bloomberg is undoing our public parks,” and noted that “for 
the rst time, ever, in New York City, there will be seven high
rise luxury condo buildings inside a public park. We should
 be worried about this.”
Dominick DeRubbio, a public safety advocate asked,“How many of you know that over 130 construction workers
have died under Bloomberg's watch?”Pointing out that Mayor Bloomberg appealed a 2005 de-cision that would have allowed same-sex couples to marry in
 New York, Cathy Marino-Thomas, board president for Mar-riage Equality New York, was outraged at Bloomberg’s hy-
 pocrisy.
“All of a sudden, after inviting Mike Bloomberg to speak 
at our rallies and events to back marriage equality in NewYork—where he refused—this year, because he wants to runfor a third term, he shows up at everything!” she exclaimed.
“And not only does he want to speak, he wants to speak 
rst.”
Eric Dixon, an attorney, said that small business owners
have a mayor who creates policies that work against small
 businesses.
“When Mike Bloomberg and his friends talk about how
he's good for business, he's talking about...the Philip Morrises,the AIGs—all the companies that get tremendous tax breaks,”
he said. “They get all sorts of preferential treatment. Mike
Bloomberg is not pro-business. He's only pro-HIS business.”
 New Yorkers are fed up with Mayor Bloomberg, and
we’re not keeping quiet.
In this week's issue, Daniel Goldstein, co-founder of Develop Don't Destroy, explains about the anti-democratic
actions and deals Bloomberg has made to make the city into a
 playground for the wealthy. Seung Ok, a teacher in East New
York, tells us what's
really
happening in our schools. Richard
Lipksy, spokesman for The Neighborhood Retail Alliance,
gives us an account of the Bloomberg administration's crony-
ism and incompetence (with a nod to the
Voice's
Wayne Bar-
rett). We learn that running New York City for the benet of 
all its citizens isn't the same as running a private business for 
the benet of a few owners and top managers—but that's the
Bloomberg model. It's what he knows. And you think he's a
good manager for ordinary New Yorkers? —Mike Dang
Fed Up New Yorkers
Fed Up New Yorkers Meeting 
Editor's Note:http://www.bloombergwatch.com
p2
Photo credit: Mike Dang
 
Fire in the Hole
by Richard Lipskyhttp://momandpopnyc.blogspot.com/
PUBLISHEREDITORART DIRECTOR
Neil Fabricant Mike Dang Jay Van Buren 
When the folks voted to
install Mike Bloomberg astheir mayor—and did it a
second time—the prevailingwisdom was that, owing tothe mayor's vast fortune, the public could count on a cor-
ruption-free mayoralty. What
was not taken into consider-ation was the Bloomberg old boys network that opened up New York City to his long-
time deputy (now chief of his
 business operations) DanDoctoroff and the Related
Companies to NYC. As a re-sult of this, we were able to
 bear witness to a whole series
of sweetheart no-bid deals
that left the city less well off 
than it should have been.We have, of course, out-
lined most notably the gifting
of the Bronx Terminal Mar-
ket by Doctoroff to his old
friend and business associate
Steve Ross (New York Times,
"Transforming Bronx Termi-
nal Market, but at a Steep
Price," 10/24/05). This storyhas been well-documented, but others less so. But nowcomes something even more
egregious. It involves themayor's culpability in the
Deutsche Bank re and the
role played by sweetheart
contractor Bovis.
Wayne Barrett has out-lined the shamefulness of all
that has transpired—a shame
that is magnied by the fail
-
ure of the local press to prop-
erly tar baby the mayor on
this issue: The
Village Voice's
July 22nd cover story,
"Bloomberg's Biggest Scan-
dal—the Deutsche Bank 
Fire—Should Be His Down-
fall—Why isn’t it?" exam-
ined the determination of top
city officials, includingBloomberg's one time top
deputy Dan Doctoroff, to ig-
nore the risk of installing Bo-
vis Lend Lease and its prime
subcontractor Galt at the de-
molition site of the bank 
 building. Doctoroff brushed
aside warnings from the
city's investigations depart-
ment about Galt in deference
to Bovis' reckless desire to
hire the “mob-tainted rm.”
Let's not forget that two
reghters were killed as a
result of the city's actions
here: “Manhattan DA Robert
Morgenthau has indicted Galt
and two of its ofcials in the
negligent homicide case in-
volving the death of two re
-
ghters, Robert Beddia and
Joseph Graffagnino, at the bank site. He also charged
one Bovis employee, but said
he did not indict Bovis be-cause it could have causedthe collapse of a company
that employs thousands.”
And, as Barrett has told
us, not a single paper has
even bothered to call for the
removal of the re commis
-sioner—an incompetent ad-
ministrator with no re ght
-ing expertise, whose claim to
fame involved a see no evil
approach to child abuse whenhe was in charge of Adminis-
tration for Children’s Ser-
vices (ACS).
The question with all of this is why did the city pro-
mote Bovis, and who was re-sponsible for the shilling of a
failed company? As Barrett points out, Deputy Dan wasin the middle of this mess as
well: “At the very moment
that Doctoroff and the Lower 
Manhattan Development
Corporation went ahead withthe Bovis contract at the bank 
site in 2005, the company
was engaged in what city at-
torneys call now "repeated
failures to perform in accor-dance” with “generally ac-
cepted professional stan-
dards” in the construction of the $275 million Bronx Hall
of Justice, the 10-story court-
house that Bovis completedalmost three years late. The
lawsuit is still pending.
All of which under-scores that the Bloomberg
administration has been rifewith incompetence and cro-
nyism, and his billionaire brothers in the press have been covering for him. We
have been particularly curi-
ous about why the
 Post's
Ru-
 pert Murdoch has been such
a mayoral toady. After all,
the paper has an ideologicalview of the world that's dia-
metrically opposed to the one
espoused by the Nanny may-or.
In response to our queryon this, Barrett referred us to
his magnum opus of last year 
on Bloomberg: “In 2007,
Bloomberg L.P. decided, ap-
 parently after some consider-
ation, not to compete with
Murdoch for The Wall Street
Journal. Murdoch similarly
decided this July not to com-
 pete with Bloomberg when
he paid $4.5 billion to buyMerrill Lynch's 20 percent
interest in Bloomberg L.P. In
this walled-off billionaire
Fed up New Yorkers will be published periodically until theelection.For all inquiries, includingadvertising and letters to theeditor, contact Mike Dang:mike@bloombergwatch.comall material © Bloomberg WatchInc. unless otherwise noted.Cover illustration and editorialcartoon by Keith Seidel.
continued on p7
p3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...