Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Pacific Mgmnt LLC v Mayer Brown LLP - 8-7-09 Amicus Brief

Pacific Mgmnt LLC v Mayer Brown LLP - 8-7-09 Amicus Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 959 |Likes:
Published by NYLibrarian
SEC Amicus Brief filed in the 2d Cir., Pacific Mgmnt LLC (PIMCO) v Mayer Brown LLP
The underlaying case if REFCO Securities Litigation
SEC Amicus Brief filed in the 2d Cir., Pacific Mgmnt LLC (PIMCO) v Mayer Brown LLP
The underlaying case if REFCO Securities Litigation

More info:

Published by: NYLibrarian on Aug 14, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
09-1619-cv
 _________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT PACIFIC MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC,RH CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,PIMCO FUNDS: PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERIES,JOSEPH MAZUR, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
(For Continuation of Caption See Inside Cover)
 On Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Southern District of New York  BRIEF OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AMICUS CURIAE, INSUPPORT OF THE POSITION OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS ON THE ISSUEADDRESSED AND IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER AFFIRMANCE NOR REVERSAL DAVID M. BECKER General CounselJACOB H. STILLMANSolicitor CHRISTOPHER PAIK Special CounselSecurities and Exchange Commission100 F. Street. N.E.Washington, D.C. 20549(202) 551-5187 (Paik)
 
IRV KREITENBERG, STEVE KREITENBERG, MATTHEW LARSON,AMERICAN FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL GROUP-ASIA, L.L.MICHAEL ALBRECHT,Plaintiffs,- v. -MAYER BROWN LLP AND JOSEPH P. COLLINS,Defendants-Appellees,REFCO INC., PHILLIP R. BENNETT, GERALD M. SHERER, GRANTTHORNTON LLP, BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC, BENNETTTRUST, LEO R. BREITMAN, CMG INSTITUTIONAL TRADING, LLC,CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK, NATHANGANTCHER, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., GRANT THORNTON, LLP, TONEGRANT, DAVID V. HARKINS, HARRIS NESBITT CORP., HSBCSECURITIES (USA) INC., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC., SCOTT L.JAECKEL, DENNIS A. KLEJNA, THOMAS H. LEE, LIND-WALDOCK SECURITIES LLC, SANTO MAGGIO, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, MURIEL SIEBERT & CO., INC., JOSEPH J.MURPHY, RONALD L. O’KELLEY, REFCO GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.,REFCO MANAGED FUTURES LLC, SAMUEL AL. RAMIREZ & CO. INC.,SANDLER O’NEIL & PARTNERS, L.P., SCOTT A. SCHOEN, WILLIAM M.SEXTON, PHILIP SILVERMAN, THE 1997 THOMAS H. LEE NOMINEETRUST, THE WILLIAMS CAPITAL GROUP, L.P., THL REFCOACQUISITION PARTNERS, THOMAS H. LEE INVESTORS LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP, THOMAS H. LEE PARTNERS, LP, UTENDAHL CAPITALPARTNERS, L.P., WESTMINSTER-REFCO MANAGEMENT LLC, WILLIAMBLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, THL EQUITY ADVISORS V LLC, THOMAS H.LEE EQUITY FUND V, LP, ROBERT C. TROSTEN, MAYER BROWN LLP,JOSEPH P. COLLINS, BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP., NEW REFCOGROUP LTD., LLC, REFCO CAPITAL MARKETS, LTD., REFCO FINANCEHOLDINGS LLC, REFCO FINANCE INC., REFCO GROUP LTD., LLC, THEPHILLIP R. BENNETT THREE YEAR ANNUITY TRUST, THOMAS H. LEEPARALLEL FUND V, LP, and THOMAS H. LEE EQUITY FUND V. L.P.,Defendants.
 
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.........................................iiiINTEREST OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONAND QUESTION ADDRESSED......................................1THE DISTRICT COURTS DECISION ................................5ARGUMENT......................................................6I.A PERSON MAKES A FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENTAND THEREFORE CAN BE LIABLE AS A PRIMARYVIOLATOR OF RULE 10b-5 WHEN THAT PERSON, ALONEOR WITH OTHERS, CREATES THE STATEMENT.................6II.ALTHOUGH PUBLIC ATTRIBUTION OF A FALSE OR MISLEADING STATEMENT TO A PERSON IS ONE MEANSBY WHICH THE PERSON CAN BE A PRIMARY VIOLATOR OF RULE 10b-5, IT IS NOT THE EXCLUSIVE MEANS;ATTRIBUTION IS NOT A REQUIRED ELEMENT OF APRIMARY VIOLATION.......................................111.This Court’s Lattanzio and Wright Decisions Do Not RequirePublic Attribution In All Instances..........................112.An Attribution Requirement Would Unjustifiably AllowDefendants To Escape Liability.............................143.The Reliance Element in Private Actions Does Not Give Riseto an Attribution Requirement.............................164.The Language Used in Central Bank Does Not Give Rise to anAttribution Requirement..................................17

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Shanyn Gillespie liked this
mtoole liked this
tkornobis liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->