Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Juan Rafael Santos, A074 191 655 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)

Juan Rafael Santos, A074 191 655 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 227|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that maintaining a vehicle/dwelling/place for marijuana under North Carolina General Statute 90-108(a)(7) is an offense relating to a controlled substance under Section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the INA. The Board further found that the immigration judge was permitted to consult the conviction documents under Matter of Davey, 26 I&N Dec. 37 (BIA 2012), in determining that the respondent did not qualify for the exception for a single offense involving possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana for personal use. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that maintaining a vehicle/dwelling/place for marijuana under North Carolina General Statute 90-108(a)(7) is an offense relating to a controlled substance under Section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the INA. The Board further found that the immigration judge was permitted to consult the conviction documents under Matter of Davey, 26 I&N Dec. 37 (BIA 2012), in determining that the respondent did not qualify for the exception for a single offense involving possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana for personal use. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Nov 21, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/10/2014

pdf

text

original

 
RODRIGO VLA, ESQ. 66 West Flager Stret, Suite 500 Mam, FL 33130 Name: SANTOS JU AFEL
   
Executive Oce r Imgraon Rvw
Board of Immigation Apeals Oce of he Clerk
5107 Leburg Pike Suite 2000 Falls Chuc, Vrgia 0530
HSICE ce of Chef Counse -SC 146 CCA oad Lmpkn, GA 385 A 0741955 Date of this notice  /3/203
cosed s  copy of h Board's decson and oder n he above-rncd cas. close
 b: dg 
Sncery,
D
c
t
Donna Crr Ce Cerk
w  k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Juan Rafael Santos, A074 191 655 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)
 
SANTS JUAN RAFE A074-191-655 STEWART DETENTN ENER 146 CCA RD LUMPKIN GA 31815 Name: SANTS JUN RAE
U.S p f 
Execuive Oe r Iigration Revie
Board of Immigraton Appeals Oce of he Clerk
 517 Leb Pk. St 2000 Fls Churc, Vginia 53
OHS/E ice of hie ounsel SO 146 A Road umpkin, G 31815 A 07 4191655 Date of this notice: 1/13/213
Eclsed is a cy of he Boa's ecisi i e abve-ereced ase. Tis oy is eng pved  y as a coesy Y attoey  eeseative has ee seed wi s eisi rsa o
8
CFR § 1292S(a) f te ataced ecision ders a y e emved  e Ued tates r afrms a  iai Juges desion oerig hat y  be emved, ay eii r reve of e aace deisn us e ed i and eeie  by he aae  of aeas ihi
30
days  the dae of e deisio ose
P Mb Gudg, Jhn
ieey
D
O
c
t
Da Car Chie Cerk
wliam sr: Docket
Cite as: Juan Rafael Santos, A074 191 655 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)
 
US Dpm  Ju
Executve Oce

Immgration Reew Decison of the Brd of Imaton Appeals Falls Chrch, Vrgna
5
File  A074 191 655 -Lumpkin, GA Dae In re: JUAN FEL SATOS a.k.a Juan Rom ak.a. Juan R Sano I REVA PROCEDNGS PEA AND MOON ON BEHALF OF RSPDE Rodrgo Via, Eqie CHAGE:
NOV 13 20
 Notice Sec. 27a)(2)(B) I&N  Ac [8 .SC.
227a)2(B)i)] Convicte o controled ubstance violaon  APLICATON Terminaon The reonden, a ative and citzen o e Dominican Reublic, d law erme eiden of he Unie Sae, apel om he igaion udge ly 31, 20, deciio, denying h motion o teinae, ad oreing hi emoval om i counry The reoden equet r oral arguent i enied
See
8 CFR.
§
1003.{e?). he appeal will be dimised We evew he Iigraton udge' nding of ct, including adverse credibiliy determinaton,  cear eo 8 C.
1003 (3)(i A oher iue, including whethe he paie have et the reevant buden of roof, nd iue of dsceion, we review de nov 8 CFR.
§
003.d()(i). We afr the decision o he Imigaion Judge. he epondens Jay 8, 008, convicion r he oense o aa Vehicleweling/Pace  a Conoled Subace, Mijuaa, in violaion o orh Carolina Genea Saue
9008(a(7, is a voaion of a Sae law elaing o a conolled utance, and rende him removable om he Unied State
(lJ.
a 6 xh 4
ee
secion 7(a)(2(B(i of e Imigaon a Nationaiy Ac, 8 USC.
227(a)2i);
 see also Mater of Epinoza,
25 & Dec. 18, 10 (BA 009 (elaiing tha eatng to" conce
h
a oad ordiny mening, namey, to an in ome elaion; o have bearng or conce; to ea efer o rng ino asociation wih o connecio with") On apeal, the reonden argue at the Deamen of Hoelan Securty HS") le o prove h eovabiliy unde econ 237a2)B)(i of he c
the Norh Crolina saue ner  e a ovce  no� copae o e ea ate,
 C
56. e esponden' argen i not relevan to e issue preene in i cae. he repoden i no charge with reovality unde secton 237(a)(2))iii) of he Act uch tha a comprion between he Norh Carolina nd deral saue i neceay o deermine wheer e reonde's oee qualie
 aggravae lony under ecio 0(a)(43(, 8 U.SC.
101(a43)).
See Loe
v.
Goaes
49 S. 4 17 S C. 62 (006. We n no ert o the eponens argume tat the Depaen of Hoelad Secuy ied to pove a hi cime wa no coveed by e saory excepon o epoabiiy

a
Cite as: Juan Rafael Santos, A074 191 655 (BIA Nov. 13, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->