Two vivid description of a muslim leader, one is modest and maybe non profit leader while the other remain as capitalist as ever? would you choose the modest one as un secretary general? or oic leader? any way i got this from an email, compliment of my funniest email group, drop a line ok...
4 Pages
Date Added |
01/28/2008 |
Category |
|
Tags |
|
Groups |
|
Copyright |
|
More info » |
|
The right side of screen looks better. Can I jump in? (just for a while)
Two leaders where history is anxious to judge their worthiness and contribution to society: both the muslim and the western. It is not easy to be in their shoes but give them a chance to govern for as long as their mission is peace.
Hmm, yes. This truely can be seen world wide, there will always be the haves and have nots. Wouldn't it be ideal if all had what they needed and there was no worry for those who did not have because they simply didn't exist... Imagine this. When I was a little girl, maybe about 10 years, a friend told me that even the rich have problems. So true it is. As I have seen this where ever I have travelled, both near and far.
Since time immemorial, emperor, kings, conqueror rules over their subject, they are the earthy king, gone are the days of sword mights and brute strenght, modern days leader still carries within the lavish and kingly stature, which they think they deserve?