II. Refugee status determination procedures and capacity and expertise of decision-makers
UNHCR notes that no RSD decision has been finalized and handed down since the first transfer of asylum-seekers from Australia to PNG commenced in November 2012. The capacity of PNG officials to conduct RSD assessments of complex caseloads presented in PNG and expertise to make decisions is limited at this time, due to a lack of experience and training. UNHCR considers that the RSD system which is in place does not currently provide a fair and efficient procedure for assessing asylum claims.
III. Legal and physical conditions of detention
The current PNG policy and practice of detaining all asylum-seekers at the closed RPC, on a mandatory and open-ended basis, without an individualized assessment as to the necessity, reasonableness and proportionality of the purpose of such detention, amounts to arbitrary detention that is inconsistent with international law. The legal framework and physical conditions for the detention and treatment of asylum-seekers remain below international standards and, overall, do not provide for a safe, fair and humane standard of treatment for asylum-seekers transferred under the bilateral arrangements to the RPC. Cumulatively, the harsh conditions for asylum-seekers at the RPC, the slowness of RSD processing and the lack of clarity regarding RSD processes and approximate timeframes for durable solutions for refugees, create a deterrent effect that is punitive in nature for those affected, rather than promoting fair and efficient humanitarian outcomes for transferred asylum-seekers and recognized refugees.
IV. Assisted voluntary returns
UNHCR supports programmes for assisted voluntary returns of asylum-seekers if decisions by asylum-seekers to return are fully informed and voluntary. Some asylum-seekers at the RPC, who may be
refugees or in need of complementary protection, may contemplate returning to their country of origin as a result of the uncertainty around RSD processing in PNG, the prospect of lengthy delays in accessing a durable solution, the harsh conditions at the RPC, and the prospect of settling in PNG where there are high levels of insecurity and significant challenges around local integration. UNHCR observed a
at the RPC rather than one promoting safe, fair and humane conditions, and identifying and protecting refugees in accordance with the 1951Refugee Convention.
V. Mental and physical health
Within the current policy settings and physical environment at the RPC, the situation of vulnerable people, particularly survivors of torture and trauma, is likely to be an issue of growing concern. These concerns are heightened due to the uncertainty and delays of RSD processing and the current arbitrary and mandatory detention framework.