2003romitromit

 
 
 
 
 
Download PDF FREE

by rko_udr

Value This
Doc
Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 15 43
Words: 1319 13640
Characters: 8626 81678
Lines: 47 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.54 5.99
Words per line: 28.06 21.89
Words per page: 87.93 317.21

Add to your reading list

Flag_red Flag this document

Document Information

185 Reads | 0 Comments

Description



PROBLEMS OF MERGER




Prepared for
Amity International Business School, Noida
Prepared by:
Romit ostwal







SYNOPSIS:

• Introduction of theoretical framework
• Statement of the problem
• Purpose of study
• Review of literature
• Question and hypothesis
• Limitations
• Significance of study
• Bibliography
• Appendices


INTRODUCTION OF THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Procter & Gamble announced the largest acquisition in its history, agreeing to buy Gillette in a $57 billion deal that combines some of the world's top brands and could lead to further mergers involving products consumers know and love.
Procter & Gamble (Research) is already the nation's largest consumer products company, making everything from Pampers to Tide, from Crest toothpaste to Head & Shoulders shampoo. Products from Gillette (Research) include not only its signature razors but also Duracell batteries and Braun and Oral-B brands dental care products.
"This merger is going to create the greatest consumer products company in the world," said billionaire investor Warren Buffett, whose Berkshire Hathaway (Research) is Gillette's largest shareholder with 96 million shares, or about 9 percent of the company.




PURPOSE OF STUDY:

Study of the products of the Proctor And Gamble and the Gillette group products which overlap after the merger having the same usage phases and the effect of the merger on all the products and their sales and other data .

The $57bn acquisition has been conditionally approved provided the companies divest a variety of overlapping assets ranging from toothbrushes to deodorant, the FTC said in a statement.














STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:

This merger will face some regulatory scrutiny because many of their products overlap (Crest/Oral-B; Secret/SoftnDri ; Old Spice/Right Guard. when any companies merge they have to explain reasons why to the DOJ/FTC, they usually throw in the rationale that they have to merge to compete or what ever the reason may be."

Procter & Gamble Co. plans to shutter more than half of its 475 distribution centers worldwide as part of a sweeping effort to cut overlapping operations and distill its shipping network following its acquisition of Gillette Co.






REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
The combined company will have more than $60 billion in annual revenues. Here are some facts about the two firms.
1. Cincinnati-based Procter & Gamble was established in 1837 and made its name selling soap and candles to U.S. government soldiers during the civil war.
2. Boston-based Gillette spends around $600 million annually on advertising.
3. In May the razor-maker paid a reported 40 million pounds ($75.4 million) to sign international soccer star David Beckham to a three-year deal as its global face.
4. Procter & Gamble employs a workforce of 110,000 worldwide and has a market capitalization of $141 billion. Gillette employs 29,400 employees worldwide and has a market capitalization of $45 billion.
5. Gillette's profit beat market expectations last October after Hurricane Ivan spurred the buying of Duracell batteries. ($1=.5303 Pound)


QUESTION:
IS PROCTOR AND GAMBLE COMPANY FACING ANY PROBLEM WITH THE MERGER WITH GILLETTE?
HYPOTHESIS:
In the past decade, the retail landscape has turned dramatically from one of primarily regional players to one dominated by a dozen or so key national players, some of which became bigger than Procter itself.
are pushing for the lowest prices possible. And a full truckload of batteries, razors and detergent will cost less than three trucks carrying the same items in partial shipments.
"Their distribution centers will kind of become supermarkets for their products
The distribution centers also could become portals into new retail areas, since Procter and Gillette each had strengths in areas where the other had not. In the United States, for instance, Gillette has a better distribution to home

Word_16x16 15 Pages


Date Added

08/20/2009

Category
Tags

1558, for instance, problems of merger prepared for amity international business school, noida prepared by romit ostwal synopsis • introduction of theoretical framework • statement of the problem • purpose of study • review of literature • question and hypothesis • limitations • significance of study • bibliography • appendices in, agreeing to buy gillette in a $57 billion deal that combines some of the worlds top brands and could lead to further mergers involving products consumers know and love. procter & gamble (research) is already the nations largest consumer products company, making everything from pampers to tide, from crest toothpaste to head & shoulders shampoo. products from gillette (research) include not only its signature razors but also duracell batteries and braun and oralb brands dental care products. this merger is going to create the greatest consumer p, said billionaire investor warren buffett, whose berkshire hathaway (research) is gillettes largest shareholder with 96 million shares, or about 9 percent of the company. purpose of study study of the products of the proctor and gamble and the gillette group products which overlap after the merger having the same usage phases and the effect of the merger on all the products and thei, the ftc said in a statement. statement of the problem this merger will face some regulatory scrutiny because many of their products overlap (crest/oralb secret/softndri old spice/right guard. when any companies merge they have to explain , they usually throw in the rationale that they have to merge to compete or what ever the reason may be. procter & gamble co. plans to shutter more than half of its 475 distribution centers worldwide as part of a sweeping effort to cut overlapping operatio, 000 worldwide and has a market capitalization of $141 billion. gillette employs 29, 400 employees worldwide and has a market capitalization of $45 billion. 5. gillettes profit beat market expectations last october after hurricane ivan spurred the buying of duracell batteries. ($1=.5303 pound) question is proctor and gamble company , the retail landscape has turned dramatically from one of primarily regional players to one dominated by a dozen or so key national players, some of which became bigger than procter itself. are pushing for the lowest prices possible. and a full truckload of batteries, razors and detergent will cost less than three trucks carrying the same items in partial shipments. their distribution centers will kind of become supermarkets for their products the distribution centers also could become portals into new retail areas, since procter and gillette each had strengths in areas where the other had not. in the united states, gillette has a better distribution to home improvement chains than does procter. but in a lot of developing markets, such as china, procter has a stronger distribution presence among stores that are visited frequently this is a very inspired initiative by p&g to match the products, because often chains like cvs or walgreens would want full trucks with diesel costing more than $3 per gallon, every shipment can be a meaningful expense. gillette will adopt p&gs market organisation structure that will involve moving business units based on geographic regions to product lines. hence, the company will also relocate from its existing office in gurgaon to p&gs headquarters in mumbai. procedure choosing the right facilities is crucial. while the gillette and wella acquisitions doubled the number of procters distribution facilities, they also added a lot more product that needs to be shipped. if procter cuts the number of centers to half, a lot more inventory will be coursing through those 235 or so remaining. procter said with that fewer, larger facilities, it can ship a broader array of products with more frequency. this might mean longer truck trips in some cases, but it should translate to fewer shipments. and with diesel running at more than $3 a gallon in most u.s. markets, and with most 18wheelers averaging about five miles per gallon, every shipment can be a meaningful expense. this should make a significant difference when it comes to ordering smallscale products made by gillette, such as batteries and razors. in years past, when retailers ordered batteries, theyd have the option of paying for a partial shipment or overstocking on a full truckload. this created inventory issues for both the retailer and gillette, said burt flickinger iii, managing director of strategic resource group, a new yorkbased retail consultant. now, if the chains can combine battery orders with those of iams and cover girl, they can order fewer shipments, which saves money. this is a very inspired initiative by p&g to match the products, because often chains like cvs or walgreens would want full trucks, flickinger said. the distribution network is one of many areas where procter expects to reduce costs. the company, has cut $200 million by consolidating suppliers and another $75 million by simplifying how it makes promotional displays. procter also expects to reduce gillettes more than 25 information technology programs by 80 percent, the company has said. statement by company we are excited that we can now move on to the gillette closing and integration, said p&g chairman ag lafley. the addition of gillette will broaden our lineup to 22 brands with over a billion dollars in sales and will take us into new product areas. i am confident that the merger will succeed. we are both industry leaders on our own, and we will be even stronger and even better together, he added. limitations job cuts coming the deal will mean about 6, 000 job cuts, or about 4 percent of the combined work force of 140, 000 employees. it said most of the cuts would come from eliminating management overlaps and consolidation of business support functions. the current value of the planned cost savings should come to $14 billion to $16 billion, according to the companys statement. p&g cfo clay daley said the companies expect to see more than $1 billion a year in cost savings by the third year after the merger. p&g has 16 products that have sales of more than $1 billion each, and gillette has another five, and with the companies expanded rosters of musthave brands, they will have great leverage in negotiation with retailers for the allimportant display space. it also will allow them to get further savings from broadcasters and other media companies on advertising purchases. p&g is already the nations largest televi, while gillette spends almost $1 billion a year on ads, primarily targeting men rather than p&gs traditional female customer. significance of study procter and gamble had taken excess from its operations . so from this study we came to a conclusion that the company was having a network of distribution more, 1758152, 00.asp

Groups
Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

or use Facebook Connect