-The truth is the statement, they rely on, which is a statement ) released on (onday, November , !13 says e4actly the opposite. lease read the statement yourselves. .
-ncorrect statement #
6 ) now have a final report that ) have now decided to release around (arch ne4t year and that he suspects that ) am doing this for elections. 9e also said the provisional report has been shared in affected and implicated parties. The truth is ) have never shared a provisional report with affected and implicated report. ) shared a draft provisional report only with five security %luster ministers who were given electronic copies with passwords. They without talking to me decided to share the report with their departments.)n terms of the roadman ) announced on the !
regarding engaging security cluster e4perts on alleged security concerns ) was only sent the names of the people that the ministers have nominated to engage with me last night after close of business. e then wrote to the (inisters today re*uesting to engage with these e4perts on ;riday. (y team is committed to work with the roadmap, which process concludes this year with a provisional report. The provisional report will not be sent to parties. <ach party will be engaged on parites that concern them. e have always maintained this understanding. 3.
-ncorrect statement %
6 The ublic rotector is sitting with the report with the intension on releasing it in (arch ne4t year to influence politics.) never said the report will be release in (arch ne4t year. ) said ) was trying to have the report released by the end of the year but the likelihood is that it will be released in =anuary !15. The statements that we have issued have consistently said the report will be released at the latest by mid =anuary. 5.
-ncorrect statement "
6 That ) was responsible for the leak to the )ndependent (ediaThe truth is that the article itself said two senior officials had informed the author. The issue ) raised with the "unday Times is that it is wrong to leak all reports, not ust the last one.
) never endorsed any leaked reports. There are two versions of the leaked reports. The first was covered by the )ndependent claiming the provisional report absolves the president of wrong doing *uoting a source in government. The second is the version covered by the (ail and #uardian. The comment in the "unday Times was saying in my understanding there are two versions of the leaked report, why there was no outrage shown on the first coverage of the purported leaked report.