Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Hiep Thanh Nguyen, A073 306 230 (BIA Nov. 26, 2013)

Hiep Thanh Nguyen, A073 306 230 (BIA Nov. 26, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 670|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the denial of an application for adjustment of status upon finding the respondent, who was paroled into the country prior to April 1, 1997, was improperly classified as an “arriving alien.” The Board also found the respondent could renew his application in removal proceedings because it had previously been denied by USCIS. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman and joined by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch and Member John Guendelsberger.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the denial of an application for adjustment of status upon finding the respondent, who was paroled into the country prior to April 1, 1997, was improperly classified as an “arriving alien.” The Board also found the respondent could renew his application in removal proceedings because it had previously been denied by USCIS. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman and joined by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch and Member John Guendelsberger.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 05, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/06/2015

pdf

text

original

 
Maur Sanjay S Esq Maur Law Oices P C.
US Dpartmnt of Jtic
Executive Oce r Immigraion Review
Board of Immigation Appeals Oce of the Clerk
5
I
07 Lesbug Pike. Sute 2000 Fals Church Vgna 20530
2989 N Semmons Freeway, Suite 1000 Daas TX 75247 HS/ICE Oice of Chef Cunsel DAL 125 E Jon Carpener wy Se 500 Irvng TX 750622324 Name: NGUYEN IE HANH A 073-306-230 Dae o s noice: 11/26/2013
ncosed is a copy of he Board's decision and order in he above-rerened case. nclosre
P Mb:
Adkins-Blanch, Charles
K.
Guenelsberger Joh Hofman Sharon
Sincerely,
D
c
a
Donna C Cie Cerk
luseg 
Docket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Hiep Thanh Nguyen, A073 306 230 (BIA Nov. 26, 2013)
 
NGUYEN, HIEP THANH A073-306-230 ROLLING PLAINS DET CENTER 118 COUNTY ROAD 206 HASKE, TX 79521 Name: NGUYEN HIEP THANH
   
Exective Oce r Immigration Review
Board of Immigation Appeals Oce of the Clerk
5107 leesburg Pike, Sute 2000 Fas Chuc Vrgni 20530
HS/CE Oice of Che Counsel -DAL 25 E. John Carpenter Fw Se 500 Irvng TX 75062-2324 A 073-306230 Date o ts notce 11/26/2013
nclosed is a copy o the Board's ecision i the above-erenced caseThis copy is being provied to you as a couresy. You attoey o repesetatie has been serve wih this ecision prsuant to
CF R § 1292(a) f the aache ecision orers that you be remove om the Unite States or arms an Immigration Judges ecision oreing that you be emoved any petition r reie of the attached decision must be le ith an eceive y the appropiate cor of appeals within
30
days o the ate of the ecision nclosure
 Mb
Adkins-Banc Cales
K
Guenelsberge John Hofman, Sharo
Siceely,
D
c
Dona Car Chie lek
g : k
Cite as: Hiep Thanh Nguyen, A073 306 230 (BIA Nov. 26, 2013)
 
U.. Dpm  Ju
Ex.ecuve Oc ! Iigation Rvw Dciso of  Bod of Imgato
A F
Ch Vg 20530
File A073 306 23 -Dl, TX
I
 e HP TH NGEN I REMOVAL PROCEEDS PEAL
 MOION Date: ON BEHALF OF ESPOEN Sjay S. Mau, Esquie PICATION Adjustent of stas; ed
NV
.
. 6 2013
 The espondent, a nave d citizen of Vietn, apeas the decision o te iation Judge dted May 9, 2013, at deteined at the  ao Judge did not have juisdictio to adjudcate e espondet's adjusnt of stat appcation d oded the espondent oed  e United States t Vie e ation Judge lso issued Aended Odes dated June 3, 013, at und e had no jisdction ove is adjuset aplicatio because e  esondent ws  ving alien
O
aea, e espondent contends that the  atio Judge eed n nding that he did not have jusdicon. The esodent aso ed a oton to  ed. The Depent of Hoend Secty hnot epoded to e apea  e oo  The espondent's otion is ted d he ecod is eded  e oceedigs.  The ation Judge eed in deteing at he did not ae jsction becaue e  esondent ws riving alien. The ecod indicates at e eondent w poled into e nited States in 994.  The eguaons itiay ovide at aen eains riving aien even if poed into e nited States de sectio 22(d)(5) of the maon d Nationaity Act.
S 8
CF. § 00.(q) Howeve, the eation he stipuates at " rivig aie  who wa poled into e United States ee Ap 1, 1997 . . will not be teated, soey y  eon of that t of ole, a  ving aien nde section 35){(A)(i of e Act Because the espondent wa poed into the United tates in 994, he shoud not be coideed  vng ien Moeve, e esondent cis on apea that te CIS deed

application  adjuent of stas d wve of inadssiiiy d, eee, jisdicio  vests back to e iaon Judge The esodent is coect at Iaon Judge aso  has jisction to adjudicate adjusent of sas apication which h bee denied y SIS d is enewed in eova oceedis.
aen (othe h n riving ien) wose adjusent of stas applicaon ha bee denied y SCIS has a t to enew e appication in  eov poceengs.
S 8
CFR § 24(a()(ii), 2452(a)(5)(ii). Accodiny e ecod is eded to e iation o  he oceedings cosistent wi is ode. ORDER Te espodent•s otio to ed is ted d the ecod is eded to he iaion Cou  the actio s aoate d the issuce of a new decisio
�·
O
Cite as: Hiep Thanh Nguyen, A073 306 230 (BIA Nov. 26, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->