You are on page 1of 3

Geopier Foundation Company

Project:
Project No:
Engineer:
Date:
Boring

Hospital de Laja
ICL-59
JPR
12/12/2012
S-3

Input Parameters:
Peak ground acceleration (g) =

0.4

Earthquake magnitude, Mw =

7.5

Water table depth (m) =

4.4

14.432 ft

boehole diameter (mm) =

165

6.5 in

Correction for sample liners (YES/NO):

NO

Rod lengths assumed equal to the depth plus 1.5m (for above ground extension).

I. Liquefaction Susceptibility (Existing Conditions)


SPT
Sample
Number
0

Depth (ft)

0.0

Depth (m)

0.00

Moist Unit
Weight
(kN/m^3)
17.3

Saturated
Unit Weight
(kN/m^3)

Measured
N

Soil type
(USCS)

Flag
Energy
"Clay"
Fines Content
Ratio,
"Unsaturated"
(%)
ER (%)
'Unreliable"

2.0

0.61

17.3

18.8

14

SP-SM

unsaturated

5.2

1.58

17.3

18.8

16

SP-SM

unsaturated

8.5

2.59

17.3

18.8

19

SM

unsaturated

11.8

3.60

17.3

18.8

19

SM

unsaturated

15.0

4.56

17.3

18.8

18

SM

18.2

5.55

17.3

18.8

20

SM

21.6

6.59

17.3

18.8

20

SM

24.8

7.57

17.3

18.8

24

SM

28.3

8.63

17.3

18.8

24

SP-SM

10

31.4

9.56

17.3

18.8

22

SP-SM

11

34.7

10.58

17.3

18.8

32

SP-SM

12

38.0

11.60

17.3

18.8

38

SP-SM

13

41.2

12.56

17.3

18.8

40

SP-SM

14

44.6

13.59

17.3

18.8

45

SP-SM

15

47.7

14.55

17.3

18.8

49

SP-SM

16

51.0

15.56

17.3

18.8

46

SP-SM

17

54.3

16.57

17.3

18.8

50

SP-SM

18

57.7

17.59

17.3

18.8

47

SW-SM

19

60.8

18.55

17.3

18.8

52

SW-SM

20

64.2

19.58

17.3

18.8

48

SW-SM

21

67.8

20.66

17.3

18.8

46

SW-SM

22

70.7

21.56

17.3

18.8

49

SW-SM

23

74.0

22.55

17.3

18.8

50

SW-SM

24

77.7

23.68

17.3

18.8

61

SW-SM

25

81.0

24.70

17.3

18.8

60

SW-SM

26

83.9

25.59

17.3

18.8

74

SW-SM

27

87.3

26.61

17.3

18.8

69

SW-SM

11
11
14
14
14
16
16
16
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8

Based on Idriss and Boulanger recommended procedures (EERI 2008)


CE =

Enrergy Ratio = Hammer Energy / 60

CB =

Borehole Correction Factor

CR =

Rod Length Correction

CS =

Sampler Size Correction

CN =

Overburden Correction Factor = SQRT (101/svc') < 1.7 in kPa

(N1)60 = CN*N60
DN (FC) = EXP(1.63+9.7/(FC+0.01)-(15.7/(FC+0.01))^2))

rd =

EXP(-1.012-1.126*SIN(z/11.73+5.133)+MW*(0.106+0.118*SIN(z/11.28+5.142))), z = depth (meters)

CSR =

0.65*PGA*(svc/svc')*rd
MIN(1.8,6.9*EXP(-MW/4)-0.058)

MSF =

Ks
Overburden Correction Factor for CRR
CRR7.5 EXP((N1)60-cs/14.1+((N1)60-cs/126)^2-((N1)60-cs/23.6)^3+((N1)60-cs/25.4)^4-2.8) < 2))
CRR MSF*Ks*CRR7.5

MSF

Ks

CRR7.5

CN

(N1)60

DN (fines
content)

(N1)60-cs

11

1.70

20.5

1.61

22

1.00

0.261

1.00

1.10

0.235

n.a.

27

1.70

25.0

1.61

27

0.99

0.259

1.00

1.10

0.335

n.a.

45

45

1.50

27.9

2.91

31

0.99

0.256

1.00

1.10

0.539

62

62

1.27

23.7

2.91

27

0.98

0.254

1.00

1.08

0.332

79

78

1.14

22.4

2.91

25

0.97

0.256

1.00

1.04

0.298

svc'
(kPa)

CRR, exist.
P-1

Factor of
Safety

CE

CB

CR

CS

N60

svc (kPa)

60

1.00

1.15

0.75

12.1

11

60

1.00

1.15

0.8

14.7

27

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

18.6

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

18.6

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

19.7

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

21.9

98

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

21.9

117

96

1.03

22.4

3.58

26

0.94

0.300

1.00

1.01

0.316

0.319

1.06

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

26.2

136

105

0.98

25.8

3.58

29

0.93

0.313

1.00

0.99

0.447

0.443

1.41

60

1.00

1.15

27.6

156

114

0.94

26.0

0.03

26

0.92

0.324

1.00

0.98

0.315

0.309

60

1.00

1.15

25.3

173

123

0.91

23.0

0.03

23

0.90

0.332

1.00

0.97

0.249

0.242

0.73

60

1.00

1.15

36.8

192

132

0.88

32.2

0.03

32

0.89

0.337

1.00

0.94

0.671

0.631

1.87

60

1.00

1.15

43.7

211

141

0.85

37.0

0.03

37

0.87

0.341

1.00

0.90

1.764

1.591

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

46.0

230

149

0.82

37.8

0.03

38

0.86

0.343

1.00

0.88

2.000

1.769

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

51.8

249

159

0.80

41.3

0.14

41

0.84

0.344

1.00

0.87

2.000

1.733

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

56.4

267

167

0.78

43.8

0.14

44

0.83

0.344

1.00

0.85

2.000

1.702

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

52.9

286

176

0.76

40.0

0.14

40

0.81

0.343

1.00

0.84

2.000

1.671

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

57.5

305

186

0.74

42.4

0.03

42

0.80

0.341

1.00

0.82

2.000

1.641

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

54.1

324

195

0.72

38.9

0.37

39

0.78

0.339

1.00

0.81

2.000

1.613

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

59.8

342

203

0.70

42.1

0.37

43

0.77

0.337

1.00

0.79

2.000

1.587

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

55.2

362

213

0.69

38.0

0.37

38

0.76

0.334

1.00

0.78

2.000

1.561

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

52.9

382

222

0.67

35.7

0.37

36

0.74

0.331

1.00

0.78

1.386

1.082

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

56.4

399

230

0.66

37.3

0.37

38

0.73

0.328

1.00

0.76

2.000

1.514

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

57.5

417

239

0.65

37.4

0.37

38

0.72

0.325

1.00

0.75

2.000

1.491

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

70.2

439

249

0.64

44.6

0.37

45

0.70

0.321

1.00

0.73

2.000

1.467

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

69.0

458

259

0.62

43.1

0.37

43

0.69

0.318

1.00

0.72

2.000

1.445

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

85.1

474

267

0.62

52.4

0.37

53

0.68

0.315

1.00

0.71

2.000

1.427

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

79.4

494

276

0.61

48.0

0.37

48

0.67

0.312

1.00

0.70

2.000

1.407

2.00

18.8

1
2

Reqd FS
Stress
reduct.
Coeff,
rd

86

1.08

23.6

3.58

27

0.95

CSR

0.281

1.00

1.03

0.353

n.a.
n.a.
0.311
0.363

1.22
1.29

0.95

Geopier Foundation Company


Project:
Project No:
Engineer:
Date:
Boring

Hospital de Laja
ICL-59
JPR
12/12/2012
S-3

Input Parameters:

0.4

Peak ground acceleration (g) =

7.5

Earthquake magnitude, Mw =
Water table depth (m) =

4.4

14.432 ft

boehole diameter (mm) =

165

6.5 in

Correction for sample liners (YES/NO):

NO

Rod lengths assumed equal to the depth plus 1.5m (for above ground extension).

II. Liquefaction Susceptibility (REINFORCED CONDITION)


SPT
Sample
Number

Depth (ft)

Depth (m)

Moist Unit
Weight
(kN/m^3)

Saturated
Unit Weight
(kN/m^3)

Delta N from
Improvement
Based on Soil
Type

Improved
N value

Soil type
(USCS)

Flag
Fines
Energy
"Clay"
Content Ratio, ER
"Unsaturated"
(%)
(%)
'Unreliable"

unsaturated

CE

CB

CR

CS

N60

svc
(kPa)
0

60

1.00

1.15

0.75

22.4

11

11

svc' (kPa)

CN

(N1)60

1.70

38.1

Stress
DN (fines
(N1)60-cs reduct.
content)
Coeff, rd

Reqd FS

1.1

CSR

MSF

Ks

CRR7.5

0.261

1.00

1.10

2.000

CRR imp P1

Factor of
Safety

0.0

0.0

17.3

18.8

2.0

0.6

17.3

18.8

12

26

SP-SM

5.2

1.6

17.3

18.8

12

28

SP-SM

unsaturated

11

60

1.00

1.15

0.8

25.8

27

27

1.70

43.8

1.61

45

0.99

0.259

1.00

1.10

2.000

n.a.

8.5

2.6

17.3

18.8

27

SM

unsaturated

14

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

26.4

45

45

1.50

39.6

2.91

43

0.99

0.256

1.00

1.10

2.000

n.a.

11.8

3.6

17.3

18.8

27

SM

unsaturated

14

60

1.00

1.15

0.85

26.4

62

62

1.27

33.6

2.91

37

0.98

0.254

1.00

1.10

1.554

n.a.

14

15.0

4.6

17.3

18.8

26

SM

18.2

5.6

17.3

18.8

28

SM

21.6

6.6

17.3

18.8

28

SM

24.8

7.6

17.3

18.8

32

28.3

8.6

17.3

18.8

12

36

10

31.4

9.6

17.3

18.8

12

34

11

34.7

10.6

17.3

18.8

12

12

38.0

11.6

17.3

18.8

12

13

41.2

12.6

17.3

18.8

12

14

44.6

13.6

17.3

18.8

15

47.7

14.6

17.3

16

51.0

15.6

17

54.3

18

57.7

19

60.8

18.6

17.3

18.8

12

64

SW-SM

20

64.2

19.6

17.3

18.8

12

60

SW-SM

21

67.8

20.7

17.3

18.8

12

58

SW-SM

22

70.7

21.6

17.3

18.8

12

61

SW-SM

23

74.0

22.6

17.3

18.8

12

62

SW-SM

24

77.7

23.7

17.3

18.8

12

73

25

81.0

24.7

17.3

18.8

12

26

83.9

25.6

17.3

18.8

12

27

87.3

26.6

17.3

18.8

12

11

1.61

40

1.00

n.a.

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

28.4

79

78

1.14

32.4

2.91

35

0.97

0.256

1.00

1.07

1.186

1.269

2.00

16

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

30.6

98

86

1.08

33.1

3.58

37

0.95

0.281

1.00

1.04

1.601

1.673

2.00

16

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

30.6

117

96

1.03

31.4

3.58

35

0.94

0.300

1.00

1.01

1.105

1.120

SM

16

60

1.00

1.15

0.95

35.0

136

105

0.98

34.4

3.58

38

0.93

0.313

1.00

0.99

2.000

1.980

2.00

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

41.4

156

114

0.94

38.9

0.03

39

0.92

0.324

1.00

0.96

2.000

1.928

2.00

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

39.1

173

123

0.91

35.5

0.03

36

0.90

0.332

1.00

0.95

1.241

1.176

2.00

44

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

50.6

192

132

0.88

44.3

0.03

44

0.89

0.337

1.00

0.92

2.000

1.844

2.00

50

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

57.5

211

141

0.85

48.7

0.03

49

0.87

0.341

1.00

0.90

2.000

1.804

2.00

52

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

59.8

230

149

0.82

49.2

0.03

49

0.86

0.343

1.00

0.88

2.000

1.769

2.00

12

57

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

65.6

249

159

0.80

52.3

0.14

52

0.84

0.344

1.00

0.87

2.000

1.733

2.00

18.8

12

61

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

70.2

267

167

0.78

54.5

0.14

55

0.83

0.344

1.00

0.85

2.000

1.702

2.00

17.3

18.8

12

58

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

66.7

286

176

0.76

50.5

0.14

51

0.81

0.343

1.00

0.84

2.000

1.671

2.00

16.6

17.3

18.8

12

62

SP-SM

60

1.00

1.15

71.3

305

186

0.74

52.6

0.03

53

0.80

0.341

1.00

0.82

2.000

1.641

2.00

17.6

17.3

18.8

12

59

SW-SM

60

1.00

1.15

67.9

324

195

0.72

48.9

0.37

49

0.78

0.339

1.00

0.81

2.000

1.613

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

73.6

342

203

0.70

51.9

0.37

52

0.77

0.337

1.00

0.79

2.000

1.587

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

69.0

362

213

0.69

47.6

0.37

48

0.76

0.334

1.00

0.78

2.000

1.561

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

66.7

382

222

0.67

45.0

0.37

45

0.74

0.331

1.00

0.77

2.000

1.535

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

70.2

399

230

0.66

46.4

0.37

47

0.73

0.328

1.00

0.76

2.000

1.514

2.00

60

1.00

1.15

71.3

417

239

0.65

46.3

0.37

47

0.72

0.325

1.00

0.75

2.000

1.491

2.00

SW-SM

60

1.00

1.15

84.0

439

249

0.64

53.4

0.37

54

0.70

0.321

1.00

0.73

2.000

1.467

2.00

72

SW-SM

60

1.00

1.15

82.8

458

259

0.62

51.7

0.37

52

0.69

0.318

1.00

0.72

2.000

1.445

2.00

86

SW-SM

60

1.00

1.15

98.9

474

267

0.62

60.9

0.37

61

0.68

0.315

1.00

0.71

2.000

1.427

2.00

81

SW-SM

60

1.00

1.15

93.2

494

276

0.61

56.4

0.37

57

0.67

0.312

1.00

0.70

2.000

1.407

2.00

Based on Idriss and Boulanger recommended procedures (EERI 2008)


CE =

Enrergy Ratio = Hammer Energy / 60

CB =

Borehole Correction Factor

CR =

Rod Length Correction

CS = Sampler Size Correction


N60 = N*CE*CB*CR*CS
CN = Overburden Correction Factor = SQRT (101/svc') < 1.7 in kPa
(N1)60 = CN*N60
DN (FC) = EXP(1.63+9.7/(FC+0.01)-(15.7/(FC+0.01))^2))

rd =

EXP(-1.012-1.126*SIN(z/11.73+5.133)+MW*(0.106+0.118*SIN(z/11.28+5.142))), z = depth (meters)

CSR =

0.65*PGA*(svc/svc')*rd

MSF =

MIN(1.8,6.9*EXP(-MW/4)-0.058)

Ks
Overburden Correction Factor for CRR
CRR7.5 EXP((N1)60-cs/14.1+((N1)60-cs/126)^2-((N1)60-cs/23.6)^3+((N1)60-cs/25.4)^4-2.8) < 2))
CRR MSF*Ks*CRR7.5

2.00

III. - CONCLUSION FROM LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS


Geopier elements need to be installed to increase CRR to to provide
adequate FS against liquefaction potential.

V - GEOPIER DESIGN SOLUTION

Hospital de Laja, Bio-Bio, Chile


ICL-59

S-3

CRR exist, CRR impr, CSR

A - From Reference 2, Equation No. 1.


0.00

(ts/s'v)/(t/s'v) = CRRrq'd/CSR = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)

FS=

kgp =

275

pci

ks =

27

pci

0.70

0.80

10.2
Selected R s for design

40.0

(Improvement Case)

C - Calculate Ra (area ratio) necessary for design (Improvement Case)


From equation 1 above:
Ra =
0.012
Ra =

0.60

30.0

Depth (ft)

Rs =

0.50

1.1

B - From Lawton 1999, Rs > 30

0.40

20.0

1.00

Rs = kgp/ks

0.30

10.0

0.290
0.290

CRR rq'd /CSR =

0.20

0.0

ts/t = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)

CRR rq'd =
CSR =

0.10

50.0

60.0

1.00 = 1/(1-4Ra+2.5RaRs)
70.0

1.2%
80.0

D - Site Coverage
1.2% Site Areal Coverage Selected for design.
3.14159 Effective area of influence for one (1) Geopier element, (sf)

90.0

267 Area of soil treated by one element, (sf)


16.34 Rectangular grid spacing required between elements (ft)

100.0

4.98 (m) Rectangular grid spacing required between elements


B - From Lawton 1999, Rs > 30
Rs = kgp/ks

(No-Improvement Case)
kgp =

275

pci

ks =

27

pci

CSR
CRR, exist. P-1
CRR imp P1

D - Site Coverage
1.7% Site Areal Coverage Selected for design.
3.142 Effective area of influence for one (1) Geopier element, (sf)
184 Area of soil treated by one element, (sf)
13.6 Rectangular grid spacing required between elements (ft)

Rs =
6.85

10.2
Selected R s for design

(No-Improvement Case)

C - Calculate Ra (area ratio) necessary for design (Improvement Case)


From equation 1 above:
Ra =
0.017
Ra =

1.7%

1.00 = 1/(1-Ra+RaRs)

4.1 (m) Rectangular grid spacing required between elements


REFERENCES:
1- Youd, T.L., Idriss, I.M., et al., 1997, "Summary Report - Procedings of the NCEER Workshop on the Evaluation of
Liquefaction Resistance of Soils," Techical Report NCEER-97-0022, December 1997.
2- Wissmann, K.J., Lawton, E.C., & Farrell, T.M., 1999, "Behavior of Geopier-Supported Foundation Systems During
Seismic Events," Geopier Foundation Co., Inc. Technical Bulletin No. 1.
3- Lawton, E.C., 1999, "Results of I-15 Research Testing" University of Utah

You might also like