Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ - 105 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION OR RESTRAINING ORDER PENDING THE OUTCOME OF PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL (DOC. #102) IS DENIED

LIBERI v TAITZ - 105 - ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION OR RESTRAINING ORDER PENDING THE OUTCOME OF PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL (DOC. #102) IS DENIED

Ratings: (0)|Views: 108|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan

More info:

Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 26, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2012

pdf

text

original

 
This litigation involves an intramural dispute among
1
persons who have, at times jointly, challenged the legitimacy ofPresident Barack Obama’s presidency based on their belief thatPresident Obama is not a natural born citizen. The instant caseis just one piece of this far flung litigation, which is nowpending in at least three federal courts.As an initial matter, the Court notes that Plaintiffsfiled the instant motion without first seeking leave of theCourt, in violation of the Court’s explicit order, dated June 25,2009 (doc. no. 78). Although Plaintiffs assert that, pursuant toRule 8 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, their filingis proper, the Court disagrees.Still, the Court has reviewed the merits of Plaintiffs’motion. The issues raised by Plaintiffs were previouslyconsidered by the Court during two lengthy hearings, at which allparties were afforded an opportunity to be heard. At theconclusion of the most recent hearing on August 7, 2009, theCourt was left with the distinct impression that Plaintiffs werenot entitled to the extraordinary relief that they had requested.Specifically, Plaintiffs did not made a threshold showing of areasonable likelihood of success on the merits, or of irreparableharm. Under these circumstances, Plaintiffs’ motion for aninjunction or restraining order pending the outcome ofIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIALISA LIBERI et al., :CIVIL ACTION:NO. 09-1898Plaintiffs,::v.::ORLY TAITZ et al.,::Defendants.:
O R D E R  AND NOW,
this
25th
day of
 August, 2009,
it is hereby
ORDERED
that Plaintiffs’ emergency motion for an injunction orrestraining order pending the outcome of Plaintiffs’ appeal (doc.no. 102) is
DENIED
.
1

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->