Dprm o Jc
Executive Oce r Iigration Revew Deciso of he Bod of mato Appels Fs Church, Viginia
ile: A201 145 50Cleveland, OH In re: ESTEB NOLASCOGASPAR REMOVA ROCEEDINGS APP PEAL Date: ON BEHAF OF SPONDEN: Maew L. Benson, Esqire ON BEHAL OF HS CHARGE Micael A Trp Assist Chief Consel
Notce Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), I&N Ac [8 U.SC.
182(a)(6)(A)(i)] - resent wtot eing admited o paroled ALICATION Motion o Sppess; teminae The respondent, a native and czen of Guaemala, appeals he Immgration udge's decson of Agst 28, 201, odeing im emoved om the U nited Staes Te appeal wll be dismissed. We evew clea ero e ndings of c, incldng e deeinaon o crediility, made y e Immigation udge 8 C.R.
1003. (d)(3)(). e review de novo all oter issues, including weher e paes ave me ei rden of poo, and isses o discretion. 8 C..R
003 (d)(3)(i) Te esponden agues tat te Immigation udge eed in denying is motion to sppress. He asses tat agents om Iigration Cstoms d Enrcemen ("ICE) violated his oh and i Amendmen rghs when tey otained evdence of hs emovaiy He e reqests tat, should te Board not set aside the Immgration Jdge's motion to suppess and teinate emoval proceedings, we sould remand he record "to condc a ll scae evdentiy earing on s moton o sppress (Resp B a
We rm e Immigaion udge's decision to deny te responden's moion to suppress.
The cts o ts case ae no in dispe On Mch 0, 011, the responden accompnie s end o a co proceedng in Saronvlle, Oio The respondents iend was in co to
The Immigraon dge issed a decison denyng te respondents moton to suppress on June
2012 wot earng tesimony on the matter. Subseuenty, he Immigron Jue admited as evdence e respondent's Fo I-213 and sstaned he aleatons and carge of remoabiiy (Es 1 2) e Immigration Judges decison o August 8, 012 was based pon the respondents "Spplemental Sumission to Motion to Sppress, that reiterated witot sgnicant cage is motion to spess (E. 4 J at 12).
Cite as: Esteban Nolasco-Gaspar, A201 145 750 (BIA Nov. 29, 2013)