Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Juan Quiroga-Briones, A028 323 575 (BIA Dec. 3, 2013)

Juan Quiroga-Briones, A028 323 575 (BIA Dec. 3, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 490|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of whether the respondent’s conviction under Texas Health and Safety Code 481.112(d) is a drug trafficking aggravated felony where he was charged in the indictment with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, but the judgment of conviction was limited to manufacture/delivery of a controlled substance. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of whether the respondent’s conviction under Texas Health and Safety Code 481.112(d) is a drug trafficking aggravated felony where he was charged in the indictment with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, but the judgment of conviction was limited to manufacture/delivery of a controlled substance. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 16, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/28/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Gajardo aa Eq. aria Gajardo Law Oice 5718 Weteime oad Se 525 Hoo
TX
77057 Name QUOGABONES UAN
S
ermen
o
usice
Executive Oce r Immigation Rview
Bd f Immtn  Oc f th Ck
 7
Leesburg Pike, Sute

Fall Church Vrgna

HS / E Oice of ief oe HOU 26 Nohpoi Die Site 2020 Hoo
TX
77060 A 028-323-575 Dae of hi otce 12 / 3 / 2013
losed is a opy of he Boad's decision ad oder i he aboveereced case Eosure
n b Ply, Rg
Siee
D
O
c
Donna Car Chef Cek
  
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Juan Quiroga-Briones, A028 323 575 (BIA Dec. 3, 2013)
 
QUIROGABRONES, JUAN A028323575
US earmen
o
Jusce
xecuve Oce  o Reve
d f mmgn l Oc f h Ck
 
ug Pik u

Fal Chuch Vgna
20530
POLK COUNTY DETENION CENTER 3400
FM
350 OUH HS / ICE Oice of Chie Counsel HOU 126 Nohpont Drive Sute 2020 Houston, TX 77060 IVNGSON TX 77351 Name: QUOGABONES JUAN A 028323-575 Date of ths notice 12 / 3 / 203
ncoed  a copy o he Bod decon n he aboveeenced cae Th coy  e povded o you a a couey Yo oey o epeeve h bee eve h  deco pu o
8
CFR § 19()  he ced decon ode h you e eoved o e Ued e o 
a
on Jude deco ode  yo e eoved y peo  eve o he ached decon  e ed h nd eceved by e appoae co o apea hn
0
dy o e de o he deco coue
 b y Rg
ceey
D
o
t
t
Do Cr Chef Cek
chuckec Uam: Dcet
Cite as: Juan Quiroga-Briones, A028 323 575 (BIA Dec. 3, 2013)
 
, - . 
S epartmen
of
Justice
Executive Ofe
r
Immgraon Reew Desion of he Board o mmgrao Appeals Fas Chh, Vgna
2030
Fie: A028 323 575 -Houston,
In re JUAN
QUIROGA BRONES
aka Juan Quiroga N EMOVAL PROCEEDNGS APAL Date ON BHALF OF SONDENT Clissa Guajrdo, Esquie N BEALF OF DHS Aice Hgue Kay Asssnt Chief Counse PCTION Termination; remd
DEC 0 3 .21
The esponent, a natve  Mexico d a awfu erme esident of the United Sates, appeas om an Immgat Judge's May 21, 03, decision sustaining he chge  remvabiit unde section 37(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Imigration nd ationality ct, 8 SC § 27(a)(2)(A)(iii), ad ordering s remva he recod wi be emanded t the Immigration Judge We eview mmigratin udges ndings of ct, incluing the determination f cediili, nder a cear eroneous standard 8 CFR  1003(d)(3)(i) e review uestins o law, incuding wheter the pates ave met the reevat udens of proo, an issues of discretin under a de novo sndard 8 CFR § 003 (d)(3)() On appeal, the respondent contests the migratn Judge's nding that his 2008 conviction r a viaion  section 482( d) of he Teas Heat a Sa Cde qulies as a "dug trafcng crime and, by etension, an agavated lony unde sectin 101(a)(43)(B) of the Act, 8 U.SC  10(a)(43)(B) he Supeme Cou hed in
Lp

Gl
549 US 7 (2006), that a state oense constitutes a "lony punsabe under te Controed Substces ct ony i i proscribes conduc punishabe as a ony nder that deal aw In
Ut S

l,
484 F3d 712, 7115 (5th Cir 2007), the Uied States Cou of Apeas  the Fih Circuit cocued hat section 481 of the Teas Hea nd Say Cde, wich criminaizes the knwing manuctue, deivery, o pssessin with intent t delive a controlled sustance, was boae thn te denitio  a dg tracking oense Te cou noed hat deiver, dened, in reevnt prt, as the ansr, actua r conscivey, o noher a cntroe substance, specicay incues oering to se a controe susance, hich does not reuire pssession f the controled subsnce, d ies outside the dention o a "drug rackig crime
S
secion 48.00 of the Teas Het and Saty Code Subseuenty, he crt in
U Stt

Fo
50 F3d 74 (5th Ci 007), noer case invoving sectin 82 of he Texas Heath
&
Saty Code, in a ecisin withdawing is May 4, 007, opinion, oted tha the inicmen had chrged the aien with pssessin wit intent to deiver, d concluded hat, as the conviction s r possessin with the intent to deiver rather  ha ust eiver o transporatin,
 Stt
v.
Gol
was not coroing
Cite as: Juan Quiroga-Briones, A028 323 575 (BIA Dec. 3, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->