Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Everline Gesare Nyabwari, A097 683 208 (BIA Dec. 5, 2013)

Everline Gesare Nyabwari, A097 683 208 (BIA Dec. 5, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,053|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a prior decision finding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not meet its burden of showing the respondent was deportable under INA 237(a)(3)(D) based on her checking a box on Form I-9 declaring her to be a “citizen or national” of the United States, but finding her ineligible for adjustment of status because she did not bear her burden of showing she did not falsely claim citizenship to obtain a benefit under the INA. The decision was written by Member Neil Miller.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a prior decision finding the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not meet its burden of showing the respondent was deportable under INA 237(a)(3)(D) based on her checking a box on Form I-9 declaring her to be a “citizen or national” of the United States, but finding her ineligible for adjustment of status because she did not bear her burden of showing she did not falsely claim citizenship to obtain a benefit under the INA. The decision was written by Member Neil Miller.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 16, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/04/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Esquenazi, Marc, sq. Schein
Esqueazi LLP 14651 Dallas Parkway Sute 123 Dallas,
TX
75254
U   
Executive Oce

Imigraion Reiew
B Igtn App c  h k
507 Leburg Pik, Sut 000 Fas Clch Vgna 050
OHSICE ice of ief Cosel -DA 125 E Joh Carpeter Fwy Ste 500 Irvg
TX
75062-2324 Nam: NYABWARI VRINE GESAR  A 09683208 Date o this otce 1252013
closed is a copy of he Board's decision ad order i the aboe-rerenced case. Eclosre
 b: M  P.
Sicee1,
D
c
t
Dona Car Chief Cerk
yg   k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Everline Gesare Nyabwari, A097 683 208 (BIA Dec. 5, 2013)
 
I
.US
Dpatmnt of Jusc Exiv O r
Imiaton
Rvw
Decso of

Bod o mao Appeals Fas
Ch
Vrg
253
Fie  A097 683 208 Dallas, X n re: EVIN GSARE NY W  EMOVAL PROCDGS MOTIN Date O BEAF  SPNDENT Mc sen, Esquire O HAL O DHS: l . Hunker Che Cose  APPLICAIO Recosideratio
OEC
-
 £013
his maer s st ere the Bod o Setemer 6, 013 whe e sused n pr nd dsissed in  te responens ape nd dened her moton to remnd. n Octoer 7 203  te responden led  tiey otion to reconsider o decson.
Se
secion 0c)(6)) o he Iiron d Nationity Act, 8 USC § 1229c)6)(B) 8 CR § 003)2) he Depen o Hoeld Secty (DHS oposes e moto, whic wl e ened Te respondet cotends th e Bod eed hen it rmed e mmtio Judes decision to dey e request   coninuance bsed o  pendn o I130, Petiton r Alen Reve (Respt Mot o Reconsder at 35) The resodents motion cotns evdence at e respondents Uied Sates citzen sbd le  I30 peton o her eal nd at s  etio as aproved on Setee 1, 201e her removl en
(
 or I17) The mro Jude und ht e responden ws removae under sectio 237()3)(D) o te Act on ccont o evence that se had de  se cm o Unte Sttes czesh on  two poyment Eiiiliy erction Fos o -s)Bsed o his se evidece, the miraton ude enied e resondents otion  a contiuce se on her edn  etio e concldntha e respodet as nadmssle unde secton 21()6)(C)ii)(I) o the Act as  le o represented ersel to e  ctize o e Unied Sttes r ny enet  uner e Act. In proceedins d on pe the resondent ed at se dd ot delierely  make a lse cm o ctizensip when she re the ctzen or ntona" ox o the o 9s  ecse dese knowi tt she as not  ctzen, she d ot kno he me o e e tinl" ( a 6 Tr at 63  Alo the Imron Jude d soe specs  e esoens tesmo o crede, e ccete er exlanaion at she s nort o the ter ntonl" (.J. t 10
6 Tr  63 1 )
.
The Immration Jde neveheless sustne the che o dertailty der secio 237a)3)(D) o e Ac nd d er o e inissibe under secton 22()6)C))( o e Act ecause it could e ined at the resonden ws atemptin to eresent ersel as
1
Te iation Je so un e esonde s removale sant o seos  237)()(B), (C)) o te Ac and we e s eermintio
Cite as: Everline Gesare Nyabwari, A097 683 208 (BIA Dec. 5, 2013)
 
\ .
 A09  08 a ned Saes izen o g n epoyen" bsed on he deberaey se saee  e Fo 9s at sh was aurzed o wok n he Ued tas (. a . Th Boar susined  spode's appeal insof  i elad o e deoably e secn 2a( of the c becaus he aon udge's easoabe ifeence id no dshge he DHS's buden  ove a h esnden was mva y cler an convicng evdence.
See
seco 40(A of the Ac;  CFR § 240(a owv we smsse e  spondent's appe of e ato udgs dn of hr eques  a cntnn as on  er eg -0 eo beause se ano e er buren o pro tha she was eigie r ajusn nder e 45a of e c eqirg in aa ha
api  adjusen e
"admisible
 o e te Ses  eme resine  "(ephass aded Fo poses of adjusen he spoeo he Doe he bde of esabisg ey  beyon ou a se was no adssbe e secn (a6)((i( of he  Ac
ee
seos 40(2( (4(A of he .  evince n is ase s quvo a es, s o e respon's ienons when se mare e cizen o naioa box on e Fo -9s (. a  . at  4
&
0.e resodent's moton acknoweges ha th disjunve  ae of e ase izen or naioa is gous ad nthig   recor esablishes  ta  esoden was asng  being a naoal whe se ard he izen o ail" box oe o s Resp' o. a . Ths bgy, wie

 o h chg of reovabiy, was qualy a o he espoe's apiain  adusen of saus  s reco e Bo apped e roper bden of oof ad eried ha e  espondent ad no estalished at she as cey  beyon b" o inamissb der seio  21(a((C(ii( of  A a god  wi ee is no wve Consequenye o oery  a he esponden was ineg  adjusnt o sas unde secon 5 of e c
We eee coey dsmsse he appea f e igran Judges dciso o deny he eques r a connue  see ajus an de e oio o rem on acoun of  aproved  0 pei The esponden's oon does no resen ny adiiona evence ha esabises ey d beyod ou er adssbiy  e elgby r adjsent osats corngy, the o wi deny th esoe' moon o ose eause hee was o eor o c or aw in or ior deisn. Seon 240(c(6) o he   R. § 1002b)()
 see aso Maer of
0-S-G,
 24
lN
De 56 5758 (B 006.
2
Te reco eonsaes ha e c sen o e o 9 a ssue is ie in e dsjcive (s 2
&
 an e w eogzes a sinc bewe e es zen f he e Ses d naio of h  Saes."
Cf
sio 25 f he 
3
s nudes ajse of ss der secon 25(i of he  w oes no wve
aie's ssiby e seco 22a(6)(C)() of  c.  2
=. 4
Cite as: Everline Gesare Nyabwari, A097 683 208 (BIA Dec. 5, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->