played in that development by the free and prevenient action of theSupernatural--in theological language, by "grace"--as against all merelyevolutionary or emergent theories of spiritual transcendence. I feel more andmore that no psychological or evolutionary treatment of man's spiritual historycan be adequate which ignores the element of "given-ness" in all genuine mysticalknowledge. Though the mystic Life means organic growth, its first term must besought in ontology; in the Vision of the Principle, as St. Gregory the Greattaught long ago. For the real sanction of that life does not inhere in thefugitive experiences or even the transformed personality of the subject; but inthe metaphysical Object which that subject apprehends.[i_1-p3]Again, it now seems to me that a critical realism, which found room forthe duality of our full human experience--the Eternal and the Successive,supernatural and natural reality--would provide a better philosophic backgroundto the experience of the mystics than the vitalism which appeared, twenty yearsago, to offer so promising a way of escape from scientific determinism.Determinism--more and more abandoned by its old friends the physicists--is nolonger the chief enemy to such a spiritual interpretation of life as is requiredby the experience of the mystics. It is rather a naturalistic monism, a shallowdoctrine of immanence unbalanced by any adequate sense of transcendence, whichnow threatens to re-model theology in a sense which leaves no room for thenoblest and purest reaches of the spiritual life.[i_1-p4]Yet in spite of the adjustments required by such a shifting at thephilosophic outlook, and by nearly twenty years of further [p. xv] [i_1-Page_xv]study and meditation, the final positions which seem to me to be required by theexistence of mysticism remain substantially unchanged. Twenty years ago, I wasalready convinced that the facts of man's spiritual experience pointed to alimited dualism; a diagram which found place for his contrasting apprehension ofAbsolute and Contingent, Being and Becoming, Simultaneous and Successive.Further, that these facts involved the existence in him too of a certaindoubleness, a higher and lower, natural and transcendental self--somethingequivalent to that "Funklein" spark, or apex of the soul on which the mysticshave always insisted as the instrument of their special experience. Both theseopinions were then unpopular. The second, in particular, has been severelycriticized by Professor Pratt and other authorities on the psychology ofreligion. Yet the constructive work which has since been done on the metaphysicalimplications of mystical experience has tended more and more to establish theirnecessity, at least as a basis of analysis; and they can now claim the mostdistinguished support.[i_1-p5]The recovery of the concept of the Supernatural--a word which norespectable theologian of the last generation cared to use--is closely linkedwith the great name of Friedrich von Hugel. His persistent opposition to allmerely monistic, pantheist and immanental philosophies of religion, and hisinsistence on the need of a "two-step diagram" of the Reality accessible to man,though little heeded in his life-time, are now bearing fruit. This re-instatementof the Transcendent, the "Wholly Other," as the religious fact, is perhapsthe most fundamental of the philosophic changes which have directly affected thestudy of mysticism. It thus obtains a metaphysical background which harmonizeswith its greatest declarations, and supports its claim to empirical knowledge ofthe Truth on which all religion rests. Closely connected with the transcendenceof its Object, are the twin doctrines emphasized in all Von Hugel's work. First,that while mysticism is an essential element in full human religion, it can neverbe the whole content of such religion. It requires to be embodied in some degreein history, dogma and institutions if it is to reach the sense-conditioned humanmind. Secondly, that the antithesis between the religions of "authority" and of[p. xvi] [i_1-Page_xvi] "spirit," the "Church" and the "mystic," is false. Each
Leave a Comment