Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RSTO1B Hoc Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:47 AM RST01 Hoc FW: Mass energy balance mass balance.ppt
--- Original Message ----From: Versluis, Rob [mailto:ROB.VERSLUIS@nuclear.energy.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:55 PM To: RST01B Hoc Subject: FW: Mass energy balance
---- Original Message ----From: Peltz, James On Behalf Of Kelly, John E (NE) Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:37 PM To: Larzelere, Alex; 'Elizabeth A Connell'; Binder, Jeff; 'Douglas.Burns@inl.gov'; Peko, Damian; Beville, Tim; Bisconti, Giulia; Cook, Trevor; Funk, Dan; Golub, Sal; Hutmaker, Matthew; Kelly, John E (NE); Kendall, Rick; McCaughey, Bill; McGinnis, Edward; Miller, Tom; O'Connor, Tom (NE-HQ); Peltz, James; Reister, Richard; Schwab, Patrick; Smith-Kevern, Rebecca; Tyson, Sean; Versluis, Rob; Welling, Craig Subject: FW: Mass energy balance
FYI --- Original Message---From: Farmer, Mitchell T. [mailto:farmer@anl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:45 PM To: Grandy, Christopher; Gehin, Jess C.; Busby, Jeremy Todd; Binder, Jeff Cc: Kelly, John E (NE) Subject: Mass energy balance
DK 661 of 1892
Mass-Energy Balances
March 21, 12:00 CST
DK 662 of 1892
- Substantial uncertainties; these numbers are bounding Alternatively, information suggests that the steam might be flowing out the reactor pressure relief valve, while saturated water (is draining out the bottom of the core region and through the pump seals). So, the system may act as a salt separator with the salt deposited up on the reactor internals (steam dryers, separators etc) while saturated coolant flows out the bottom.
-
Ifthis isthe case then the units should be able to run for awhile using seawater.
DK 664 of 1892
2-3
6.4 MW
DK 665 of 1892
flowpath
~StemVessel Se
J Elericacl
Drxa' Ike
INmu
.Tmine-.,a Jet pT ,-e
TO' O
DK 666 of 1892