iLib08 - CitaviiLib08 - CitaviiLib08 - CitaviiLib08 - CitaviWhile these data indicate that conscious visual experience may be evoked directlyby particular variations in the flow of spatially unstructured light over time, it must beassumed that the systems responsible are essentially temporal in character andcapable of representing a variety of visual forms and colors, coded in differentfrequencies or at different phases of the same processing rhythm.Schlagwörter Adult; Color Perception; Humans; Light; Male; Models, Psychological; PhysicalStimulationmethods; Time Factors; Visual PerceptionBobon, D. P.; Lecoq, A.; Frenckell, R. von; Mormont, I.; Lavergne, G.; Lottin, T.: [Critical flicker fusion frequencyin psychopathology and psychopharmacology. Review of the literature]. In: Acta psychiatrica Belgica, Jg. 82, H.1, S. 7–112. AbstractAs far back as the second century, Ptolemy reported the apparent immobility of wheel radius at a certain speed. The psychophysical laws of this flicker fusionphenomenon related to the frequency of the light stimulus were established in 1834-1835 by the Englishman Talbot and by the Belgian Plateau, whose thesis in Liège isdescribed as a landmark in the field. CFF is more a measurement of cortical arousalthan of visual functions. In psychophysiology, CFF underwent periods of successand oblivion, at the mercy of researcher's enthusiasm or disappointment. At the turnof this century, Pierre Janet measured CFF in the laboratory of physiology of theSalpêtrière Hospital and demonstrated its decrease 'in hysteria, in states of depression, of lowered tension'. All reviewers of CFF literature have overlookedthese observations, reported by Henri Piéron in the 'Melanges dedicated toMonsieur Pierre Janet'. When CFF falls into disgrace, it is because of the variabilityof its results, due to differences in apparatus and designs of the trials as well as thegreat number and the intrication of the variables which modify CFF thresholds,among them the nonsensory variables. When CFF is reappraised, as it has beenthe case in psychopharmacology in recent years, the reason is that it represents abrief, easy and economical measure of vigilance which, under certain conditions,seems to be also reliable, valid and sensitive. In the present monograph, the first inFrench on CFF, the authors try to analyze the most important contributions of theliterature from the standpoint of the most relevant variables: characteristics of thestimulus (light intensity, wave form, wavelength, light-dark-ratio, diameter of theflickering point), test procedure (light vs. dark adaptation, visual angle, continuousvs. discontinuous presentation, monocular vs. binocular vision), influence of variousphysiological or psychological conditions (pupillary diameter, age, training, IQ;anxiety, depression, motivation etc.). The authors summarize the prerequisite for CFF to measure vigilance or aging in psychopharmacological research. The presentMonograph is dedicated to the authors' 'Maîtres', who recently became EmeritusProfessors, namely the ophthalmologist Roger Weekers, the pioneer of the clinicalapplication of CFF in Belgium, and the psychiatrist Jean Bobon, who pioneeredclinical psychopharmacology in Belgium.Schlagwörter Adaptation, Oculardrug effects; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Child; Dominance,Cerebralphysiology; Female; Flicker Fusiondrug effectsphysiology; Humans;Intelligencedrug effects; Male; Mental Disorderspsychology; Motivationdrug effects;Photic Stimulation; Psychotropic Drugspharmacology; Sensory Thresholds; VisualFieldsdrug effects; Visual PathwaysphysiologyBoshouwers, F. M.; Nicaise, E. (1992): Responses of broiler chickens to high-frequency and low-frequencyfluorescent light. In: British poultry science, Jg. 33, H. 4, S. 711–717. Abstract1. The influence of the flicker frequency on physical activity and energy expenditureof broilers was studied using commercially available high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) fluorescent lamps in a 23L:1D lighting schedule. 2. Broilers werereared under and adapted to HF. They were alternately subjected to HF and LFduring measurement of activity and energy expenditure. 3. In comparison with HF,LF inhibited activity (number and intensity of movements), but did not influenceenergy expenditure. 4. It was concluded that the 100 Hz flickering of low-frequency
Add a Comment