Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
P. 1
Migration Theory

Migration Theory

|Views: 23,551|Likes:
Published by windito

More info:

Published by: windito on Aug 31, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





   C   E   N   T   E   R    O   N    M   I   G   R   A   T   I   O   N ,   C   I   T   I   Z   E   N   S   H   I   P   A   N   D    D   E   V   E   L   O   P   M   E   N   T
Hein de Haas*
Migration and Development:A Theoretical Perspective
Paper presented at the conference on ‘Transnationalisation andDevelopment(s): Towards a North-South Perspective’, Center forInterdisciplinary Research, Bielefeld, Germany, May 31 - June 01, 2007COMCAD Arbeitspapiere - Working PapersNo. 29, 2007
* International Migration Institute, James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford.Draft Paper, comments welcome: hein.dehaas@qeh.ox.ac.uk
Working Papers – Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development 
 2de Haas, Hein: Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective, Bielefeld: COMCAD,2007(Working Papers – Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development; 29)The COMCAD Working Paper Series is intended to aid the rapid distribution of work in pro-gress, research findings and special lectures by researchers and associates of COMCAD.Papers aim to stimulate discussion among the worldwide community of scholars, policymak-ers and practitioners. They are distributed free of charge in PDF format via the COMCADwebsite.The opinions expressed in the papers are solely those of the author/s who retain the copy-right. Comments on individual Working Papers are welcomed, and should be directed to theauthor/s.University of BielefeldCenter on Migration, Citizenship and Development (COMCAD)Postfach 100131D-33501 BielefeldHomepage: http://www.comcad-bielefeld.de
Working Papers – Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development 
This paper aims to put the debate on migration and development in a broader historical per-spective of migration theory in particular and social theory in general. The scholarly debateon migration and development has tended to swing back and forth like a pendulum, fromdevelopmentalist optimism in the 1950s and 1960s, to structuralist and neo-Marxist pessi-mism and scepticism over the 1970s and 1980s, to more nuanced views influenced by thenew economics of labour migration, “livelihood” approaches and the transnational turn inmigration studies as of the 1990s. Such discursive shifts in the scholarly debate on migrationand development should be primarily seen as part of more general paradigm shifts in socialtheory. The shift that occurred over the 1990s was part of a more general shift away fromgrand structuralist or functionalist theories towards more pluralist, hybrid and structuralistapproaches attempting to reconcile structure and actor perspectives. However, attempts tocombine different theoretical perspectives are more problematic than sometimes suggesteddue to incommensurability issues and associated disciplinary divisions.Since 2000, there has been a remarkable, and rather sudden, renaissance of optimisticviews, in particular in the policy debate, as well as a boom in empirical work on migration anddevelopment. This has coincided with the rediscovery of remittances as a “bottom up” sourceof development finance and the celebration of the transnational engagement of migrants withthe development of their origin societies. However, such optimism has tended to go alongwith a striking level of amnesia of decades of prior research. Migration and development isanything but a new topic. The accumulated empirical and theoretical evidence stress thefundamentally heterogeneous nature of migration-development interactions as well as theircontingency on spatial and temporal scales of analysis and more general processes of socialand economic change, which should forestall any blanket assertions on migration-development interactions.Current policy and scholarly discourses naively celebrating migration, remittances and trans-national engagement as self-help development “from below” also shift attention away fromthe relevance of structural constraints and the important role states and other institutions playin shaping favourable general conditions for social and economic development to occur. Thisraises the fundamental question whether the recent shift towards optimistic views reflects averitable change in (increasingly transnationally framed) migration-development interactions,the use of other methodological and analytical tools, or is rather the deductive echo of a gen-eral paradigm shift from dependency and state-centrist to neoliberal and neoclassical viewsin general.

Activity (108)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Burulizze Gona added this note
gr8 article
Mirjana Kraja Sejdini liked this
Bihemo Ladislaus added this note
Mr. Bean's Brother liked this
Ilundy Pereira liked this
Paul-Dee Donkor liked this
Ahmed Choudhary liked this
Agnieszka Radziwinowicz liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->