Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 1
IS 104 Theories of Development
2nd Semester, SY 2008-2009
Ms Lorna Q. Israel
3 March 2009
national and international level. However, in the real world, everyone and every single country
are impossible to achieve due to different historical, political, economics, social and geographical
background. Because of this, first world countries achieve economic development while third
world countries cannot. Therefore, we think aside from the backgrounds, is there any other factor
such as the role of institutions that can contribute to have economics change and development?
Then, we pick three authors, Irma Adelman and Ha-Joon Chang and his co writer Peter Evans, to
Among the first two authors, Irma Adelman was born in Rumania on 14 March 1930 and
got Ph.D. in Economics at University of California, Berkeley in 1955. She was a professor in her
university from 1955 to 1994 and wrote so many books and articles which were mainly focusing
on economics and development. (Adelman, online, 2009) The second author is Ha-Joon Chang, a
Korean, educated at the Seoul National University and is Assistant Director of Development
Studies in the Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge. He wrote books
include Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (Anthem,
2002), and Globalization, Economic Development, and the Role of the State (Zed, 2003).
1
Generally, three of them discussed about the role of institutions and economic
development which are mainly emphasized on local institution such as government and its
policies and global institution such as International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Trade
Organizations (WTO). Moreover, they give comparisons and contracts among different countries
like Korea, Taiwan, Latin American, Japan, India and so forth. Aside from the similarities, there
are some differences: while Adelman provides by sketching the history and characteristics of the
post-Bretton Woods global system, Chang and Evans depict major changes in the global political
economy and the process of constructing and maintaining institutions from the changes.
The three writers’ writing styles are different to some extent. While Adelman is short and
understandable explanation, Chang and Evans are long and a bit complicated justification for us.
Personally, it may have a hard time to understand the reading if one does not have the basic
concept of economic development. We feel they are passionate about what they have written as
they exert enough effort to convince their readers by providing as much as evidence as they can
such as relevant illustrations and historical events. Furthermore, they not only simply provide us
with explanation but also make us think beyond the reading such as the crucial role of different
institutions to have economic development, the weak and strong policies of the institutions, the
Before starting third readings, we understand that political institution such as domestic
state. However, we did not think the other institutions such as economics and social-cultural play
a significant role in economic development. Moreover, we fail to notice the weakness and
strength of the institutions that give a path for economic change and development. And, we never
2
dig our thoughts to the deepest part of government who controls and create effective policies to
institutions and economic development. Therefore, in this paper, we would like to mainly discuss
the significant role of domestic political institutions, and global economic institutions with
relevant illustrations.
A government of one’s country has the crucial role to play in economic change or
define and enforce the economic rules. The role of government is the economy is not merely to
tax and spend part of economy’s income but the government maintains institutions that are very
important for the economic growth. Protection of property rights, police protection, and judicial
system to administer justice and enforce contract, national defense and bank regulation are some
Although in this capitalist world, the role of government is minimized as people are
clamoring for free trade policies, global economy and property rights, government policies are
still important to encourage individuals, engage in productive activities, and prevent the
economic crisis and inflation in the country. In other words, the market system cannot function
properly without the government institutions. For the economy to progress, the government
should enforce effective economic policies, invest in human capital and better technology, and
should stabilize the macroeconomic by providing full employment to its citizens. Therefore, the
better institutions and economic policies of the state government can bring large increase in
3
In the case study of Myanmar/Burma, in the year following the Independence in 1948, it
was one of the economically wealthiest countries in Southeast Asia country. The period between
1950 and 1962 was the Golden Age of the Post War era for Burma. Then in 1962, “Burmese way
of Socialism” began, which marked the economy collapse of the nation when the military
government began to nationalizing all the economic activities. At the same time, the regime
isolated the country from outside world and moved back to the anti-modernization that stagnate
the economy growth (Hauff, 2007). Nowadays, the central government spends half of the
economy income for its military use rather than spending for social welfare and economy
investment. Therefore, inadequate capabilities, severe corruption, political instability and weak
economic policies lead the country in the economic regress and economic crisis.
To sum up, the domestic government is the key player in leading the country to economic
progress tends to occur in societies in which there are clear incentives to produce, invest, and
As the world became more and more globalized, the need for International institution
became prominent in making and enforcing the economic policies in global economy. The power
of state government in defining economic policy has been challenged by the construction of the
The global economic institutions such as the World Trade Organization (WTO),
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank which were established shortly after the end
of WWII mainly aim to help the developing world countries in catching up with the developed
countries in economic growth and to prevent. The main goal of these institutions is to promote
4
the free market as the leading countries are from the capitalist countries. While WTO is engaged
in the task of eliminating all barriers to global free trade, the World Bank and the IMF look after
the liberalization of domestic capital accounts and privatization of the national economies in the
developing countries (Narlikar, 2005). Although these global economic institutions are calling
for the fair trade that in theoretically would mutually benefit for both rich and poor countries, in
practically their policies somehow cause more disparities in economic growth of the developing
countries.
It is inescapable to say that the global economic institution is needed because the
industrial economies have grown beyond their original boundaries and the world leaders are
needed to make the decision in the time when there is a world economic crisis. Many of the
world organizations commit its member states to a variety of noble objectives such as improved
sustainable development and an enhanced share of developing countries in world trade. The
world organization such as the WTO, IMF and the World Bank have helped to expand the
industrial and export agricultural sectors of poor countries, provide loans to their governments
for development schemes and technology methods for the third world countries that can be
However, many of the economic policies imposed by these world organizations only
beneficial for the industrialized countries while make the third world to be more suffered. For
instance, the policies of free trade by reducing the trade barrier imposed by General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and WTO have caused the developing countries to be suffered
because the developing nations can’t compete with the industrialized countries in the global
market in term of goods and service quality, technology advancement and government subsidies.
5
Also, in the trade between the developed and developing nations, wages rates persistently
different. The poor countries exported agricultural products that are large quantities of cheap
labor and imported industrial products that are small amount of expensive labor. This led to
terms of trade favoring the higher cost products of the center, while devaluing the lower cost
exports of the agricultural countries. Besides, the Structural Adjustment Program that is imposed
the IMFs, which have three measures; expenditure reduction aimed to balance of trade in import
and export, expenditure swifting aimed as decreasing consumption and increasing saving and
institutional reforms centered on market liberalization make the poor countries have caused the
third world countries to be left more behind the economic development (Peet and Elain, 1999)
In short, the economic or global institutions can either support or thwart the development.
The policies made by these institutions can influence the economic behaviors of its membership
countries. As the global economy has became more important, the power of the state
governments became more challenged but these government also should maintain their roles and
Conclusion
We see the authors’ arguments and points lead logically to the next. For example, first,
both of them introduced what they are going to describe. Next, they followed their introduction
in main portrait with respective illustrations that they have set. Then they have a helpful
introduction and conclusion which covered all so that even though if we cannot get every
specific meaning, the introduction and conclusion guide us to have a better understanding on the
Personally, we do agree not only Adelman’s ideas but also Chang and Evans’
perspectives on the role of institution in economic changes, and global institutions and economic
6
development. They argue leadership commitment of economic development, development policy
relevant for globalization, and the financial architecture of global institutions. We believe that
these are essentially important because to have a strong economic, the leadership skills of
government must be effective, and tangible to protect its country from external power and
There is not any weakness from Adelman’s arguments as we notice she convinces us with
strong arguments by designing Bretton Woods System which stressed trade liberalization but
explicitly encouraged barriers to international short- and long-term capital flow. In the system,
government can choose its autonomy for macroeconomic such as domestic unemployment,
inflation, interest rates, and wage and welfare policies. One of her strong arguments is as follow:
analogous to the Bretton Woods System, while maintaining some of the virtues of the liberalized
trading and investment climate introduced by more recent globalization. The Bretton Woods
system supported the Golden Age of development for developing countries and unprecedentedly
high, stable growth for developed ones. It would therefore seem desirable to approximate it as
We think the authors fail to discuss about the financial crisis started in Thailand in 1997
which was substantially shaking through Southeast Asia’s economy. They left out those
important issues because they only paying attention on Korean, Taiwan, Latin American, and
Russia rather than explained specific issue on the crisis in 1997. Probably, they are not interested
to argue because they might think the crisis in Thailand is less important than Korean and
Taiwan. We think they should talk about the issue because we are from Southeast Asia (SEA)
countries and we must know things happened in SEA so that we can prepare for our financial
7
All in all, Adelman is the best author for us to answer our question because she discusses
the significant role of both domestic and global institutions with relevant illustrations such as
Bretton Woods System, and eight lessons that direct implications that are good for national
development of developing countries. She is explaining not only the system but also the
institutions are one of the most responsibilities ones for economic changes and development.
They have full authorizations to create rule, regulations, policies, actions and limitations for the
betterment for countries. Without the institutions interventions and transformations in country’s
development, her elaboration makes us a simple thought by having well organized writing
8
References:
Books
Online articles
Hauff, Micheal. (2007). Economic Studies on Asia: Economic and Social Development in
Myanmar/Burma. Available at http://www-vwl2.wiwi.uni-kl.de/aktuell/Economic-and-
Social-Development-in-Burma-Myanmar.pdf, accessed on February 27, 2009.
Adelman, Irma. Curriculum Vitae. Available at http://are.berkeley.edu/~adelman/AdelmanC.pdf,
accessed on March 1, 2009.
Chang, Ha-Joon. Policy Innovations. Available at
http://www.policyinnovations.org/innovators/people/data/06812, accessed on March 1,
2009.