High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
UNIWD STATES COURT OF APPEALSR E c E 1 V E DOLLY c DwYER CLERK
U.s. COIIRTOFAôPEALS
Atlp 3 1 20%OR THE NINTH CmCIJIT
FILED --- --. --
DOCKETED
DATE INITIAL
RJC 1. FINE,
Appellant and Petitioner,
VS.
Case No. 09-56073
D.C. No. 2:09-cv-019l4 JFW (CW)
SYRIFF OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, et a1,Appellees and Respondents
APPELLANT'S OPEMNG BRIEFRICHARD 1. FINEPrisoner ID # 1824367c/o Men's Cenkal Jail44l Bauchet Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Pro Se
Case: 09-56073 08/31/2009 Page: 1 of 48 DktEntry: 7047502
15181920
21
23
Case: 09-56073 08/31/2009 Page: 2 of 48 DktEntry: 7047502
l (2. -l-l1e tllll-kltltl-A,t) stltrlclftrti s rrl Etrl (1 Ettkl rec tlsftl ......................-...................................-.........- 3 -7l . The unconstltutlonal, lllegal cnmlnal pa ents mandate recusal .... .....................3
a
2. The charges of attacking the integrity of the court mandate recusal ............. . ......3
4
3 Recusal is man ted because Judge Yaffe is judging his own act1'ons..................38
5 '
21. Jtltlé;tl lfKftt-t%tl' S klllAll tlilrrl lllt rrl Etlltllttkl S rtltl IS tl .............-.......................-....-.-......... 3 6)
6
7 5. Recusal is mandated because the system of a local gove ent who is a pa
8 to a case mying the judge of the case has been held a dem'al of due process .......39
9 (2 )ll lllzs1-()11 .....................-........................................-......................................................................4 1
101112
1314
1516
171819
20
2122
2324 -25262728
-
iii-
Case: 09-56073 08/31/2009 Page: 3 of 48 DktEntry: 7047502
Add a Comment