Share This Document
Copy and Paste URL
Page
Valleywag: Ever wonder precisely why big companies such as AOL are so painfully sluggish? Here's an insight. AOL recently launched an enhanced search service which, alongside search results from Google, showed capsule reviews, videos and other content from AOL itself. Straightforward enough. Splice in the different databases, slap a name on the product, pray. Not for AOL. The company engaged a top-tier naming agency, evaluated 120 different options, tested the finalists with focus groups in Denver and Chicago, checked on the meaning in 16 languages -- and the brand strategy group explained its process in a laughably belabored 20-slide presentation. After all that preparation, they forgot to remove the Powerpoint file from the website. Read on, for the screenshots, and a window into the corporate hive mind.
19 Pages
Date Added |
03/26/2007 |
Category |
Uncategorized. |
Tags |
|
Groups |
|
Awards |
|
Copyright |
|
More info » |
|
Man, this just shows why AOL is going nowhere... This process and name is exactly the sort of thing consumers appreciated in the Web 1.0 world.
And one more fact is so AOL-ish and pre-Internet: They obviously did not even check the availability of the domain name. In none of their core markets (US, Germany, UK), fullview.com/.de/.co.uk is available. I think any decent company in 2007 would make this a major blocker (or at least mention it to the Executive team in such a presentation :)
On the previous post: If you consider a brand name for your venture, the least thing you want to have is AOL's money to waste on such stuff, but better bring a good product out. This is why companies like AOL are tanking big time, and you shouldn't...
Very instructive and excellent result. It's indeed a FullView(tm) of the process. Very professionnal. I whish I could offer me such kind of brand name production.