Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Esau Lara, A097 322 982 (BIA Dec. 16, 2013)

Esau Lara, A097 322 982 (BIA Dec. 16, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 233|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of an application for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) upon finding the respondent could not benefit from the imputation of his mother’s residence and presence in the United States. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the denial of an application for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) upon finding the respondent could not benefit from the imputation of his mother’s residence and presence in the United States. The decision was written by Member Hugh Mullane.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 26, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/28/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Ortiz, Raquel Smith, Esq. Smith Otiz PC
49
W Fulleon icago, IL
669
Name: LARA, ESAU
US   
eue e  a ee
Board of Immigraton Appeals Oce of the erk
507 Leburg Pik, St 2000 Flls Chuc Vgn 20530
HS/C Oice of Chef Counsel -CHI

West Van Buren Street Chicago, IL
667
 A
9--98
Date of this notice
1 /16 /1
ed  a py  he ad deis a de i e ae-eeed ase sue
 b M gh G
Seey
D
C
t
a Ca Che Cek
   k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Esau Lara, A097 322 982 (BIA Dec. 16, 2013)
 
•

Depament of Jusice
Executive Ofe r Immaton Revew Decson o he Board ommgraon Appels Fas Crc, Vgna
2050
ie: A97 322 982 Ccago IL In e: EAU LA  EMOVAL POCEEDGS CETIFICATION Dae: ON EAL O EODENT: aque mi Oiz Esquie ON EAL O D: Geoey
P
iin Assstant Cief Cnse
DEC 16 203
APPLICATION: empoy Potected Status voutay depae stay of emoval On Jly 17 213 te Immigaion Judge ceied ts ecd t te Board ursuant to ur Jne 28 213 decisin emdg e cse  incusion of a sepaate wien o al decsion Te Iiation Jdge pepaed a tten decision daed Ap 4 212 Te esponden a native and citzen of onduas
1
appeas om that poion of e Iigation Judges decision ate Api 4 22 wic und he esponden inegie  Tempoay Ptecte tatus (TPS") pusat to section 244 of e Immiatin and atonalty Act 8 U.C. § 1254a Te espondent also appeas te dea of vouty depaue and a stay of emova e appea wi e dsmssed Te espndent og cose conceded ta e is ineligie  T ecause e enteed te United ates ae te cto date  egiiity (J at 2 T at -11 ). On appeal he espondent contends tat te Immgaion Jdge sld ave aowed im to appy  T as a deivative eneciy e conends tat he is a cild of a T egistrt is mohe wo he aleges is a TP egistan Te espondent esents tis argment  te s time n appeal ad ts it is no popely ee s Even if consued as a motion to emd hweve we woud not gant te moion The espondent has n sumited poof of his motes egistation and es not sw wy he coud nt ave sumied is appication   at any tie ding e yes is case was ee te mmigatin Judge  Moeove ecause he as nt sown tha he independently satises al initial egisatin equiements  T as a ate egistant hee is no asis to emand o appy  TP
 Mae of  Ehevea
25 & Dec 12 5 (BIA 211) ldg tat a ate initial egisant  PS nde 8 CF
124422 ms deedetly meet a iitia egistation eqiemets o TS incding pesence in te Ute Saes on te date e egn state was designate  T)
e Immigation Jdges wien decision icorrecy identies the espoden as a ciize ad naional o eico and odes m emoved to eico oweve he eros are armess as the mmigatin Jdges ode opey grats vontary depae ad ateaively odes im emved to onduras
Cite as: Esau Lara, A097 322 982 (BIA Dec. 16, 2013)
 
097 32 982 n adition, the respont caot imput his mohers resinc and presenc o mee th ate regisato reqirents.
 S Castllo-Enquz v Hold,
690 F3d 667 (5h Cir. 2012) (hodig at a cd cnnot impu is pent's ligiblty r TPS)
D Lon-Ochoa v. Aty Gn. of t
,
62 3d at 355 (holding that alns were statory neigble r TPS, even thoug they wre miors, wher they ile to prsonay me the cotiuous resienc and connuous pysical preence requireme; h continuous resience o aien pants cold not b mpted to e mnor apicnts;
Cants . old,
597 3 229, 738 (4th Cr. 200 (Traxlr, CJ, concuing (sae
 s also Claa-Matnz v Hold,
493 eAppx 934 (1t Ci 2012 (same ur, th same devativeresdnce requireent as b reecte n oter sim imigation contex
 S g, Matt of Montoa-la,
6 I&N Dc 12 (BA 013 (rejctng imputation o a pats lawl peent rsient statu nd resience in e Unit tates to n unemacipated mnor r purposes of establsing the chld's eligibilty r cancation o remova uner ection 240(a) o te Act);
 Matt of Escoba,
24 IN Dec 231 (B 2007); an
 Matt of Raz-Vaas,
24 &N Dec. 599 (A 2008);
ClaMatnz v. Hold, supa
 MontoaSlva, spa,
a 126, we notd hat the upreme Cour n
old v. Matnz Gtz,
_
S
_,
132 S Ct 01 (202) hld that th Board raonaby construe th tte adressng elgbty r cacelaion of remova to require that ach alen must satis the stautory reqirmns regg law pmanent rsnt status and continuos resece, witout imputing a paent's pro o awful permanent resdent status or resnce to a chi hs, the rpoden has not estabishe his elgibility r PS. he responet's argument that  mmgration udge abused hs scrtio n ot peitting hi ationa tim to se a stay of rmoval or proscutoa screon om the Deprmnt of Home Scuity (DS") s o ersuasie he respondent had ben grat cotinuancs to invstigate any ponta rs o reie e t quali r. n addition, he DHS oti  miatio Juge tha i cine proscutoal icretion. iter he mmigraton uge nor this Board cn provide te respondet wt reief om removal on t basis of itari or euitable conces or oerwise provi hi an inni stay of removal in orer to alow i to reain n th country.
  Maof Yau,
25 I&N Dc. 103, 109 (B 2009);
 Matt of Mdna
19 I&N Dec 734 (BA 1988 T igraton Juge properly denid the respondents rquest r volunty eprue uner 240B(a oe ct, 8 .C § 1229c(a) The respondnts ca ha ben penng r more thn two yers (.J at 2 he Imiation Jue may not grnt vounty depare beyond 0 ays ar te master calnar hearing at which the case is nitially calend r a mrits hearing without a stipulaton om th DHS attoey
 
8 .FR § 124026(b(2) s he DH  not stpuat to he 120day period requested by the rsponnt, he Iigraton udg propery grated the respondnt voluntay epar r 60 ays, whch th resonden udrsood emed  o l he s a 
Tr
a -. As  responden s subec to rmoval om he ntd Stats an has ot establshed egbiliy r ay rm of reie om rmova which c  grned o m urng e course of these proceeing, the mmigration g propery nter an orr o voy epue nd tatvly, remova in is case. onthess, the rspodn is not precld om lng a 2
Cite as: Esau Lara, A097 322 982 (BIA Dec. 16, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->