Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Ahmed Nadeem Malik, A092 006 532 (BIA Dec. 17, 2013)

Ahmed Nadeem Malik, A092 006 532 (BIA Dec. 17, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 499|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacated an order granting a DHS motion to terminate proceedings where the respondent, who wished to challenge the rescission of his lawful permanent resident (LPR) status by USCIS, opposed the motion and the immigration judge cited no valid basis for terminating proceedings. The decision was written by Member Michael Creppy and joined by Member Ellen Liebowitz and Member Hugh Mullane.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacated an order granting a DHS motion to terminate proceedings where the respondent, who wished to challenge the rescission of his lawful permanent resident (LPR) status by USCIS, opposed the motion and the immigration judge cited no valid basis for terminating proceedings. The decision was written by Member Michael Creppy and joined by Member Ellen Liebowitz and Member Hugh Mullane.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Dec 26, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/06/2015

pdf

text

original

 
Zaidi Zaheer, Esq. Attorney at Law 9100 Souhwes Freeway Suite 235 Houson,
TX
7707
4
Name: MALIK AHMED NADEEM
U Dpmn  usic
Executive Oce r Immigration Review
oard of migrto pps Qc of h k
5 bu Pk t 2 Fa /m·l rgin 23
OS/ICE ice of Chief Counsel -CHI 525 Wes Va Buren ree Chicago, IL 60607 A 092006532 Date of this noice 12/17/203
closed i a copy of he Boa's eciio an orde in te above-reference cse. cose
P b
Creppy, Michael
J
Lebowitz Elen C Muae Hug
G.
Scee,
D
c
Dona Carr ef
Clk   
Docke
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Ahmed Nadeem Malik, A092 006 532 (BIA Dec. 17, 2013)
 
:
U..
Deparment
of
Jusice
Executve Oce r Immiaton Revew Decsin f the Bard f Immatn Appeals Fas Ch, Vrga
20530
i: A092 00 532 Cago L n r: AMD NADM MALK
REMOVAL PROCEEDNGS APPEAL Da: ON EHAL  RESPONENT: Zar ad, Esquir ON EAL O S Minni  Yun Asssan Ci ouns APPLCAON: minaion; ronsidraion
� 17 203
T rspondn appas om  mmigraon Judgs dsion dad Novmbr 9, 202, dnyng hs moon o ronsdr  mmigraion Judgs dson minang prodngs h rmova prodings  b rinsad, and  rord wi  rmandd o  Immiraion Jdg r hr prodings  rspondn's rqus r ora argun is dnid 8 CR § 003()(7) W rvw r ar rror  ndngs o  mad by  miaion Judg 8 C R §003{d)(3)(i) W rvw d novo a ohr ssus, nuding whr  pais av m  rvan budn o proo and issus o dsron 8 CR § 003(d)(3)(i) T rspondn adjusd o aw prmann rsdn sas on Dmbr
I,
990 Su saus was rsndd by  govn on brary 25, 995 T DHS d a Noi o Appar on Ju 2, 200, and  mmigraon Jdg rand  Hs moon o rmina prodings wihou prjudi on Agus , 202 n Spmbr 4, 02,  rspondn d a moion o ronsdr ad r-assrd a hang o h 995 rsission o is a pmann rsidn saus On Novbr 9, 202,  mmigraion Judg ssud h dision urrny br us, w dnid h rspondns moon o ronsdr T graion Judg dnd  rspondns moion o ronsidr h rmnaion o prodings ar onuding a "prodings av bn propry rminad,  propr vnu r  rspondn's amn [anging  rsisson o his a pn rsdn sas] s  C
(lJ
a -2) n aa,  sondn agus a  rssson o s a prmann rsidn sas is rviwab in rova prodings, ad ha  rmnaon o prodings "vy dpvd  Rspondn o a r r rvw o US IS ga rsssion ordr On rsdion vss  h Immgaon Judg, nr pay an o  rminaon o rodngs wio a ror rason r h graon dg o do so
See Maer
of W-
-,
24 &N D 18 12 (BA 200) (saing a on ursdiion vss i an migraon udg, a noi o apar anno b and by h DHS, w mus insad mov r
Cite as: Ahmed Nadeem Malik, A092 006 532 (BIA Dec. 17, 2013)
 
092 006 53 dimal of the matte on the ba of a ground et th in the egulation)
see also
8 .F. § 239 (etting th gound on ich the DHS may cancel a notce to appea); 8 .F. § 1239.(c) (etting h ground on hich the DHS may moe  dimal);
cf Matter o VzcarraDelgadillo
13 I&N Dec. 5 (BI 1968) (holdig that the Immigaton Judge had authoity to termnate poceeding a mproidently begun n a cae hee teminaton a reaonable d both paie ageed to the motion to dm). In thi egad an Immgaton Judge may termiate poceeding hen the DHS c ot utain the chage o  othe pecc circumtace content it the la and applcable egulation
See Matter o
W
supra.
In th cae te Imigation Judge ncorectly tated that the epondent dd not opoe termnaton of poceeding (I.J. Dec dated ugt 6 2012 I.J Dec. date Noembe 9 201 at 1-2) the eponent tmely led h oppoton to he DHS oton to Temnate on ay 4 2012 in hch e opoed te DS reuet baed on  chalenge to the econ (epondent Ooton led ay 4 2012) On the record eently ee u nete the DHS oton to Termnate no e migraton Judge oe ated ugut 6 02 poide a ba  termnaton ithn the cope of the regulation 8 F. §§ 2392 12392
ee aso Matter o
W
spra
u e nd t appopiate to rentate te emoa poceedng and to remand i cae r rher proceedng a e Immgaton Jdge deem neceay unde the ccumtance including a moe complete analy of the DHS' moton to teminate.
Id· see also atter o A-P,
2 I&N Dec. 468 473 (BIA 999);
Matter o M-P
20 I&N Dec. 786 (BIA 1994). ccodingly the llong orde hall be enteed ODE: The Immigaton Judge' ode e acated and the emoal poceedng ae rentated FTHR O The ecod i emanded to the Immgaton Judge r e poceedng conitet th the egong decon and  the enty o a ne decion
B
2
Cite as: Ahmed Nadeem Malik, A092 006 532 (BIA Dec. 17, 2013)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->