> .S. -a+y Sai&!r: They had t! re%!+e three &ayers !' s$i !'' %y hads ad ar%s a'ter "#$#shi%a e)!s#re B Treated a&%!st as i' I had the )&a9#e >
> Press C!'erece: Pe!)&e were tryi9 t! c!%%it s#icide ab!ard SS Rea9a d#ri9 "#$#shi%a %issi! B S!%e tried t! 9et !'' shi) B It was &i+i9 i 'ear e+ery day, it was h!rrib&e ><hat Is The ACTA Ris$ '!r Paci'ic C!ast Residets 'r!% "#$#shi%a Radiati!
(a)a is )!ised t! )ass a bi&& which w!#&d
. Ad the .S. 9!+er%et is
not even monitoring
radiati! &e+e&s i the waters !'' the .S. c!ast.
“We don’t have a U.S. agency responsible for radiation in the ocean!
. “"t’s really bi#arre.!
The government says we don’t really need to do that because we’re predicting very low levels
Physicians for Social Responsibility notes: There is NO safe level of radiation.
“… every increment of radiation exposure produces an incremental increase in the risk of cancer
$rotracted e%posure to low&level radiation is associated with a significant increase in the risk of leukemia according to a long&term study published 'hursday in a U.S. research (ournal.
ACE Directi+e 0/63, ACE P!&icy '!r De'esi+e 4eas#res a9aist !w e+e& Radi!&!9ica& HaFards d#ri9 4i&itary )erati!s, 2 A= G6
AR 11/G, The Ar%y Radiati! Pr!9ra%, 2 4A GG
"4 /02.23, Treat%et !' -#c&ear ad Radi!&!9ica& Cas#a&ties, 20 DEC 01
(P 3/11, (!it D!ctrie '!r )erati!s i -5C E+ir!%ets, 11 ( 00
-AT STA-A= 23, C!%%ad =#idace ! !w e+e& Radiati! E)!s#re i 4i&itary )erati!s, 3 4A 00