Global Tyranny ... Step by Step
Copyright © 1992 by Western IslandsAll rights reservedPublished byWestern IslandsPost Office Box 8040Appleton, Wisconsin 54913(414) 749–3786Printed in the United States of AmericaLibrary of Congress Catalog Card Number: 92–081764ISBN: 0–88279–135–4To Carmen,Jonathan and Christopher,and my father and mother,
with love and gratitude
Contents
Introduction 1.The New World Army 2.In the Name of Peace 3.The UN Founders 4.Reds 5.The Drive for World Government 6.Treaties and Treason 7.The Global Green Regime 8.The UN Grab for Your Child 9.The UN War on Population 10.The New World Money System 11.The Compassion Con 12.The New World Religion 13.UN Regionalism — The European Community 14.Get US out! Bibliography Personal Acknowledgments About the Author
Introduction
America and the world stand on the brink of one of the most perilous epochs in this planet’s history.According to the purveyors of conventional wisdom, communism is dead, the Cold War is over, and thegreatest threats to world peace and security are rampant nationalism, inequitable wealth distribution,overpopulation, and environmental degradation. Yet the threat to a just world peace and comity amongnations and peoples comes not from political fragmentation, ozone holes, greenhouse gases, an over-abundance of people, a shortage of natural resources, or even from the frequently offered scenarios of "rogue" elements in the former USSR acquiring control of nuclear weapons.The true, imminent danger to America and to all nations seeking peace and good will stems fromwidespread acceptance of the monstrous falsehood that in order to live in an "interdependent" world, allnation-states must yield their sovereignty to the United Nations. This lie is given dignity by other lies,chief of which is that Soviet totalitarianism has been buried forever.1 A too wide acceptance of thesedangerous falsehoods is resulting in: 1) a massive transfer of wealth from the taxpayers in the West tothe still-socialist governments of the East that remain under the control of "former" communists; 2) thegradual but accelerating merger or "convergence" of the U.S. and Russia through increasing economic,political, social, and military agreements and arrangements; and 3) the rapidly escalating transfer of power — military, regulatory, and taxing — to the UN. Unless the fiction underlying thesedevelopments is exposed, national suicide and global rule by an all-powerful world government areinevitable."The Bush Administration,"
Time
magazine noted on September 17, 1990, "would like to make the U.N.a cornerstone of its plans to construct a New World Order."2 That observation merely stated theobvious. In his speech to the nation and the world on September 11, 1990, Mr. Bush stated: "Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge...." He proceeded toannounce his hopes for "a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."3 It becameabundantly clear to veteran students of "world order" politics that a major new push for worldgovernment had begun. Only a few years ago, any such attempt would have flopped miserably. Duringthe 1970s and 80s, the UN’s record as an enclave of spies, a sinkhole of corrupt spendthrifts, and ananti-American propaganda forum for terrorists, Third World dictators, and Communist totalitarians, hadthoroughly tarnished its carefully manufactured image as mankind’s "last best hope for peace."From 1959, when the UN could boast an 87 percent approval rating, the annual Gallup Poll showed acontinuous decline in popularity for the organization. By 1971, a Gallup survey reported that only 35percent of the American people thought the UN was doing a good job. By 1976, Gallup claimed that thesupport had dropped to 33 percent. In 1980, it declined further to an all-time low of 31 percent. "At nopoint since [1945]," said Dr. Gallup referring to his latest figures, "has satisfaction with the overallperformance of the world organization been as low as it is today."4 The John Birch Society’s long andfrequently lonely billboard, bumper sticker, petition, letter-writing, and pamphleteering educationalcampaigns to "Get US out! of the United Nations" had made good sense to many Americans.In the early years of the Reagan Administration, UN-bashing became positively respectable, evenfashionable. U.S. Ambassador to the UN Jeane Kirkpatrick could be seen and heard almost dailydenouncing the world body’s anti-Americanism, tyranny promotion, and fiscal profligacy. Editorialsopposing UN actions and the organization itself began appearing with frequency in local and regionalnewspapers, and occasionally even in major national news organs.Anti-UN sentiment had already reached the point in 1981 that veteran UN-watcher Robert W. Lee couldreport in his book,
The United Nations Conspiracy
: "Today the UN is increasingly regarded not as a
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Global Tyranny StepBySte
"The Bush Administration," Time magazine noted on September 17, 1990, "would like to make the U.N. a cornerstone of its plans to construct a New World Order." That observation merely stated the
obvious. In his speech… (More)
obvious. In his speech… (More)
9.6K
Reads
15
Readcasts
4.4K
Embed Views
Recommended
Notes
Load more
