Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Keyes|Barnett GOV MOTION TO DISMISS - 56 2009-09-04

Keyes|Barnett GOV MOTION TO DISMISS - 56 2009-09-04

Ratings: (0)|Views: 720 |Likes:
Published by tesibria

More info:

Published by: tesibria on Sep 04, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
GEORGE S. CARDONAActing United States AttorneyLEON W. WEIDMANAssistant United States AttorneyChief, Civil DivisionROGER E. WEST (State Bar No. 58609)Assistant United States AttorneyFirst Assistant Chief, Civil DivisionDAVID A. DeJUTE (State Bar No. 153527)Assistant United States AttorneyRoom 7516, Federal Building300 North Los Angeles StreetLos Angeles, California 90012Telephone: (213) 894-2461/2574Facsimile: (213) 894-7819Email: roger.west4@usdoj.govdavid.dejute@usdoj.govAttorneys for DefendantsUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASOUTHERN DIVISIONCAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, et al.,))Plaintiffs,))v.))BARACK H. OBAMA, et al.))Defendants.))No. SACV 09-00082 DOC (ANx)DATE: October 5, 2009TIME: 8:30 a.m.CTRM: 9DHon. David O. Carter
(1) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS; AND(2) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728i
TABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEI.INTRODUCTION.......................1II.STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS.....1III.ARGUMENT.........................41.This Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction OfThis Action.....................4A.Plaintiffs Lack Standing Herein ........41.No Plaintiff Can Show The RequiredConcrete, Traceable Injury-in-FactTo Provide Standing Herein........52.Plaintiffs Cannot Satisfy TheRedressability Requirement For Standing..9B.This Case Presents Non-Justiciable PoliticalQuestions..................11C.This Court Lacks Subject Matter JurisdictionOver PlaintiffsQuo Warranto Claims.....16D.This Court Does Not Have Subject MatterJurisdiction Of This Action Under Either42 U.S.C. § 1983, Or 42 U.S.C. § 1988....182.This Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction AndPlaintiffs Fail To State A Claim For Relief In ReTheir FOIA Claims.................193.This Case Must Be Dismissed As To SecretaryHillary Rodham Clinton, And Secretary Robert M.Gates, For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction,And Failure By Plaintiffs To State A Claim ForRelief.......................224.This Case Must Be Dismissed As To First LadyMichelle Obama And Vice President Joseph BidenBecause Plaintiffs Have Failed To State Any ClaimWhatever Against Them...............24IV.CONCLUSION.......................25
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728ii
 
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESFEDERAL CASES
ASARCO, Inc. v. Kadish,490 U.S. 605, 109 S.Ct. 2037, 104 L.Ed.2d 696 (1989)....6Baker v. Carr,369 U.S. 186, 82 S. Ct. 691,7 L. Ed. 2d 663 (1962).........................11, 15, 16Barron v. Reich,13 F.3d 1370 (9th Cir. 1994).......................23, 24Bates v. Rumsfeld,271 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2002).......................8Berg v. Obama,574 F. Supp. 2d 509.....................................5Caldwell v. Green, et al.,451 F. Supp. 2d 811 (W.D. VA 2009).....................19Chappell v. Wallace,462 U.S. 296, 103 S.Ct. 2362, 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1984).....9Corrie v. Caterpillar,503 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2007).......................11, 12Dettmann v. U.S. Department of Justice,802 F.2d 1472 (D.C. Cir. 1986).........................20Fallini v. Hodel,783 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1986)..........................24Gasparutti v. United States,22 F. Supp. 2d 1114 (C.D. Cal. 1998)...................20Harrison v. Obenshain,452 F. Supp. 1172 (E.D. VA 1978).......................19Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation,551 U.S. 587, 127 S. Ct. 2553, 168 L.Ed.2d 424 (2007)...6Hollister v. Soetoro,601 F. Supp. 179 (2009).................................2Hyland v. Clinton,208 F.3d 213, 2000 WL 125876 (6th Cir. 2000)...........15

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->