publisher (hence use of the term "proprietary”. Only a very limited set of well-defined rights areconceded to the end-user.One example of such a proprietary software license is the license for
Microsoft Windows
. As isusually the case with proprietary software licenses, this license contains an extensive list of activities which are restricted, such as: reverse engineering simultaneous use of the software bymultiple users, and publication of benchmarks or performance tests.
Free software license
Free software is not 'free' in the sense of unconditional enjoyment of the software. It is a softwarewhich is licensed to the end user under a License which follows the substantially the model terms prescribed by the FSF advocated GNU GPL and other similar software License Agreements. Inother words, the Original publisher/Author retains the actual Title (copyrights) to the softwarelicensed to the Licensee. (There is no change in the ownership of the software. This License insteadof granting limited rights to the Licensee grants all Rights (which for other intellectual property products like books etc is 'this right and not all') except the right sell license it on different terms.The only restricting clause in this kind of software license is the one which restricts the right of Licensee to further License the software on different terms than under the free software license.This one condition makes it obligatory for the Licensee to further License any derivative software built from the open source software to be licensed only on Open source license. The overall effectof the Licensing system of the free software movement is perpetuation of free use of software.Commercial Licensing for a profit is also prohibited by the above free software License.An example of a Free Software license is the
General Public License (GPL).
This license is aimedat giving the end-user significant permission, such as permission to redistribute, reverse engineer,or otherwise modify the software. These permissions are not entirely free of obligations for theend-user, however. The end-user must comply with certain terms if the end-user wishes to exercisethese extra permissions granted by the GPL. For instance, any modifications made andredistributed by the end-user must include the source code for these, and the end-user is notallowed to re-assert the removed copyright restrictions back over their derivative work.
BUGS (SOFTWARE DEFECTS)
Leave a Comment